OLD OLD Patriot 5.3's, F11 Cam, Bolt Ons, 9" 1999 TransAm with 98k on the clock
#1
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
did 403hp and 379 ftlbs SAE through exhaust
and 409 hp and 388 ftlbs SAE through cutouts
my car has always hated the dyno but it runs great, pulls consistent 11.4's @ 123-124 on 1.7 60' weighing 3450
cant complain, rather put it down at the track than on the rollers
and 409 hp and 388 ftlbs SAE through cutouts
my car has always hated the dyno but it runs great, pulls consistent 11.4's @ 123-124 on 1.7 60' weighing 3450
cant complain, rather put it down at the track than on the rollers
#6
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Tally TransAm
did 403hp and 379 ftlbs SAE through exhaust
and 409 hp and 388 ftlbs SAE through cutouts
my car has always hated the dyno but it runs great, pulls consistent 11.4's @ 123-124 on 1.7 60' weighing 3450
cant complain, rather put it down at the track than on the rollers
and 409 hp and 388 ftlbs SAE through cutouts
my car has always hated the dyno but it runs great, pulls consistent 11.4's @ 123-124 on 1.7 60' weighing 3450
cant complain, rather put it down at the track than on the rollers
#7
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Cgillies86
Those are some impressive times and excellent trap speeds. Dyno's are mearly tuning devices. The only way to compare dyno numbers between two cars is: using the same dyno on the same day. Sounds like the dyno you were on is a bit stingy.
funny thing is it has pulled +/- 5 hp and +/- 3 ftlbs on 4 different dynos of the past three years (havent changed anything on the car other than the rear end which oddly enough showed no change in power just a 7-8 fltbs loss in torque)