Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

LQ9, LS6 intake, 232/234 .595/.598 cam 113 lsa firebird

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-08-2007, 02:55 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
$750 L98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, Texas
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default LQ9, LS6 intake, 232/234 .595/.598 cam 113 lsa firebird

Ok this car has been down so long i'm having withdrawl problems, after all this down time i want to play the guess game to get my hopes up (blew original 350TPI, Blew rings out of built 383TPI, LQ9/LS2 conversion going in).

Specs are:
-LQ9
-LS6 intake
-LS6? manifolds
-Stage II 4L60E
-3k Stall
-CAI
-Magnaflow exhaust
-No cats

Question is, what purely speculative dyno numbers should i expect to see? I will post results and graph once the project has been completed.
Old 11-08-2007, 03:16 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
$750 L98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, Texas
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Is 410-420RWHP to much to ask from the setup? What's the weakness of this motor, and what mod comes next (new to these setups). Would headers help the setup with this cam? Is it worth Stage 3 heads? would a low boost magnacharger be a nice mod?
Old 11-08-2007, 04:07 PM
  #3  
Banned
 
AlLtHiRdGeN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Lts would put you in the 440-460whp range through an auto, without long tubes you are leaving alot on the table.
Old 11-08-2007, 04:23 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
$750 L98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, Texas
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So it's fair to say I will require headers next, as manifolds are not adequate to support much flow past stock power numbers?

I am also thinking about a small dose of nitrous, does anyone have an arguement for or against a 75 shot down the road?
Old 11-08-2007, 04:29 PM
  #5  
Launching!
iTrader: (97)
 
we_todd_did's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: McDonough, GA
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

150-200 Shot Dont Be A Pu$$y
Old 11-08-2007, 04:38 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
$750 L98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, Texas
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Just be glad I'm not disillusioned enough to think i can run a 250+ shot on non-forged components!

This idea only stems from the thought of getting greedy if i ever run it at the track. If and when I install nitrous, i plan on it being a meager amount as i like all motor power anyway.
Old 11-08-2007, 04:44 PM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
$750 L98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, Texas
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Also my goal will be drivability as my priority (it is my only car). The car should be close to 500 Flywheel HP anyway - my next problem will most likely be no traction lol
Old 12-21-2007, 12:31 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
$750 L98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, Texas
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

OK the car put down 285RWHP/360RWTQ Unlocked.

End mods are:
-LS1 manifolds
-LS6 intake
-LQ9 block
-317 heads
-comp 921 springs/retainers
-XER281HR 232/234 cam
-stock Y pipe
-Dynomax muffler
-Stage 3 4L60E
-3.73 rear
-2800 Stall
-22* timing
-Tuned
-13.2 AFR

what do you guys think of these number? They seem a bit low, but we think it may be due to the restrictive nature of the manifolds and y pipe.
Old 12-21-2007, 02:34 PM
  #9  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Assman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Roy, Utah
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Definatly need to loose the stock manifolds but still that sounds low. That would be low for a stock cam let alone that cam.
Old 12-21-2007, 03:28 PM
  #10  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (6)
 
Mike@HSW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Glenolden, PA
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by $750 L98
Just be glad I'm not disillusioned enough to think i can run a 250+ shot on non-forged components!

This idea only stems from the thought of getting greedy if i ever run it at the track. If and when I install nitrous, i plan on it being a meager amount as i like all motor power anyway.
throw a 150 shot at it!!!
Old 12-22-2007, 03:09 AM
  #11  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (30)
 
12secSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,690
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by $750 L98
OK the car put down 285RWHP/360RWTQ Unlocked.

End mods are:
-LS1 manifolds
-LS6 intake
-LQ9 block
-317 heads
-comp 921 springs/retainers
-XER281HR 232/234 cam
-stock Y pipe
-Dynomax muffler
-Stage 3 4L60E
-3.73 rear
-2800 Stall
-22* timing
-Tuned
-13.2 AFR

what do you guys think of these number? They seem a bit low, but we think it may be due to the restrictive nature of the manifolds and y pipe.
Wow, that is very low! I have a similar setup, although with a smaller cam and an LQ4 and look at the numbers in my sig. You need to get long tubes to free up the exhaust. The headers aren't the only issue with you dyno results, there is something else wrong.
Old 12-24-2007, 11:57 AM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
$750 L98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, Texas
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I know this thing dyno'd worse than a stock LS1 - It feels strong, but I don't see it lasting long.

They are telling me headers will allow more timing, but I am missing nearly 100RWHP....I don't think headers and a new tune will accomodate that kind of power. Maybe i should give up on this thing and find something that puts down proven times and power?

It's really odd that this cam won't even spit out stock ls1 numbers:

XER281HR
232/234 .595/.598
113+3 LSA
With Comp 921 springs and retainers...


Anyone have a clue what could be going on with it?
Old 02-15-2008, 01:24 PM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
$750 L98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Round Rock, Texas
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'm still baffled as to why this car is down on power, a stock LQ9 dynos those numbers doesn't it? I don't understand why it's so hard for this cam to produce 60-70RWHP more than what it has, I'm watching build ups and stock manifold cammed builds. 380RWHP seems to be close to max on stock manifolds.

Now I'm not even sure if it sounds like it has a cam in it...

Any thoughts?
Old 02-16-2008, 11:22 AM
  #14  
On The Tree
iTrader: (62)
 
lowbirdws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: La Honda, CA
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Compression?

What is your compression ratio? How many c/cc's per chambers? The reason I ask is that I put hogged out, ported ls6 heads set for turbo applications on my LS1. The bowls were opened from 64 cc to 72 cc, compression dropped to 9.7.1. I lost a few ponies due to compression loss. My aim was to lower compression (even though not quite as much as I would have liked) because my new APS twin turbo kit goes on next week. Hope this helps in your quest for enlightenment. Good Luck! Marv
Old 02-16-2008, 11:50 AM
  #15  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
black_z's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Do you have the graph? If not, where does power start to fall off? Have you done a compression/leakdown test?
Old 02-17-2008, 02:28 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (24)
 
BES Stroked Nova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Lawrenceburg Indiana
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

needs more timing, say bye to stock mani's and spend 1k on a set of headers... I am trying to talk my buddy into it also...
Old 02-17-2008, 11:52 PM
  #17  
Banned
 
Rameaux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default wrong

Yea, I don't want to be captian obvious, but something is definitely wrong when those numbers are coming up...I agree with the compression/leak down test, could be timing too.
Old 02-18-2008, 03:15 AM
  #18  
ZV8
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
ZV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

its making good torque, what RPM did you stop at on the dyno? I would check valvetrain parts
Old 02-18-2008, 12:12 PM
  #19  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
litle88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Burbank, Illinois
Posts: 2,561
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I think its the compression ratio. he is using the 317 heads and everything is stock OE parts.
what gaskets are you using?
what pistons are you using?
+1 for the Longtubes!
goodluck
Old 02-19-2008, 09:21 PM
  #20  
On The Tree
iTrader: (6)
 
Crowder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Knoxville
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what dyno was this on, it sounds to me that it might have been on a dyno dynamics which reads true WHP numbers


Quick Reply: LQ9, LS6 intake, 232/234 .595/.598 cam 113 lsa firebird



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 PM.