I just might have the most RWHP for a cam only (TSP Torquer V3) LS1...opinions?
12-10-2007, 07:01 PM
#22
10 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Alloway,NJ
Posts: 2,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
15.9 afr max 
wow that seems pretty lean...also why so little torque i thought this cam was designed to give good torque...hince the name...
edit ok i see the 15.9 was just a blip at the end of the run...haha
nice hp though
also highest cam only i have seen was from demonicbird
245/250 .611/.615 110+1
full bolt ons minus a EWP
check cardomain page for exact mods in sig
456rwhp 408rwtq
-brandon
wow that seems pretty lean...also why so little torque i thought this cam was designed to give good torque...hince the name...edit ok i see the 15.9 was just a blip at the end of the run...haha
nice hp though
also highest cam only i have seen was from demonicbird
245/250 .611/.615 110+1
full bolt ons minus a EWP
check cardomain page for exact mods in sig
456rwhp 408rwtq
-brandon
i did however get an EWP put on the other day.....id like to see what that has brought me upto now
congrats on the numbers!! nothing to be ashamed about thats for sure
-brandon
12-10-2007, 10:09 PM
#23
Just because it has a label on it doesnt mean itll follow the trends most dynoes do. Dynojets are the mst consistant dyno to dyno, (but useless to tune on) the more features and loading capabilities you have though, the more variance you will se dyno to dyno. Ive had customers come here and tell me their car made x40 on someones mustang dyno, x33 on a dynojet and makes x19 on ours for example.
Stick to a dyno with known repeatable results if you want the numbers to mean a lick. We have some NMRA guys dyno their stuff on ours and its repeatable to a number or two all year long, but we spent DAYS going thru their bulky code/calibration load scheme stuffs
12-10-2007, 11:51 PM
#24
10 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Indiana boy
Posts: 4,174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Those are nice results for cam only. You should be proud!!
I'm going back to a cam only set up this season. And I just bought a used tqr v.3. Putting it in a used 60K mile short block with prc springs and cm pr's, ls6 int, ported tb, pace setters with a flow master cat back. We'll see what I end up with after Chad gets it tuned. It will be mid summer when I get it dyno'd.
My mustang drag car has a T-rex with ported 243's and a vic jr int and 750 demon carb. Can't wait to see what it does also.
I'm going back to a cam only set up this season. And I just bought a used tqr v.3. Putting it in a used 60K mile short block with prc springs and cm pr's, ls6 int, ported tb, pace setters with a flow master cat back. We'll see what I end up with after Chad gets it tuned. It will be mid summer when I get it dyno'd.
My mustang drag car has a T-rex with ported 243's and a vic jr int and 750 demon carb. Can't wait to see what it does also.
12-11-2007, 03:50 AM
#26
okay i dunno WTF is going on with my formula then...i went with a Lunati cam as follows
234/236 .050 .544/.545 @112 LSA with rebuilt heads, comp hardened rods, Dbl roller timing chain, ported LS6 pump, crane lifters,spec 2 flywheel clutch pkg LS6 intake, stock TB and a full SLP LT exhaust loudmouth set up with NO CATS , in a stock 10 bolt with 373's and didnt break 375 rwhp ...so wtf?
but ahhhh yea damn good numbers i would be proud!!
234/236 .050 .544/.545 @112 LSA with rebuilt heads, comp hardened rods, Dbl roller timing chain, ported LS6 pump, crane lifters,spec 2 flywheel clutch pkg LS6 intake, stock TB and a full SLP LT exhaust loudmouth set up with NO CATS , in a stock 10 bolt with 373's and didnt break 375 rwhp ...so wtf?
but ahhhh yea damn good numbers i would be proud!!
12-11-2007, 10:52 PM
#37
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
is it a 98 did i read that correctly???thats the highest cam only 98 ive looked at.....theres an thread somewhere titled 98 owners have you reached 400 rwhp cam only??? i think....there was very few in the thread that broke 400.....
nice numbers though
nice numbers though
