Dynamometer Results & Comparisons Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars

Proudly Introducing Tick Performance's Flagship LSx Camshaft: The Polluter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-14-2008 | 12:45 PM
  #41  
Trev_SS's Avatar
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
Default

I am really thinking about selling my ms4 for this cam, I am wondering how much difference there is in the cam? my ms4 isn't the greatest as a daily driver. I think I would really love more down low torque than my ms4 but still pull like a freight train.
Old 08-14-2008 | 12:52 PM
  #42  
BAD ASS TA WS6's Avatar
BMW ///M Nerd
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,112
Likes: 1
From: NH
Default

Hmm. I have an F14 waiting to be installed. May sell it and go this route though.

I don't plan on doing gears... How high would you guys recommend spinning this on a stock bottom end? This thing with a FAST setup looks like it would pull to 6600+
Old 08-14-2008 | 01:37 PM
  #43  
sidewayz28's Avatar
TECH Junkie

iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,548
Likes: 1
From: seattle
Default

Originally Posted by Trev_SS
I am really thinking about selling my ms4 for this cam, I am wondering how much difference there is in the cam? my ms4 isn't the greatest as a daily driver. I think I would really love more down low torque than my ms4 but still pull like a freight train.
i cant see you seeing much of a difference... well at least going through the hassle of a cam swap and youll end up with similar results
Old 08-14-2008 | 07:44 PM
  #44  
Alvin's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Default

I was personally impressed with how smooth this car drove. quite a few big sticks feel pretty rough down low and this one ran smooth as class. Also the torque difference between this cam and many others was outstanding. I don't think joey mentioned it but one of the primarys on this car was smashed about shut and then patched back together by an exhaust shop. If this thing had a nice set of Kooks or ARH, a good intake and 90mm, throttle body it would be one hell of a freak. I don't even think the throttle body was ported on this car.
Old 08-15-2008 | 02:37 AM
  #45  
98camaroLS1M6's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 0
From: Cherry Hill, NJ
Default

Nice results, yeah a pull from 2300-2500rpm would be nice to see the torque.
Old 08-15-2008 | 02:15 PM
  #46  
sidewayz28's Avatar
TECH Junkie

iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,548
Likes: 1
From: seattle
Default

i dont see why a pull from that low of an RPM is necessary? who in their right mind starts a race (and wants to make POWER) at 2300 rpm? No offense^^^^
Old 08-15-2008 | 02:24 PM
  #47  
98camaroLS1M6's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 0
From: Cherry Hill, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by sidewayz28
i dont see why a pull from that low of an RPM is necessary? who in their right mind starts a race (and wants to make POWER) at 2300 rpm? No offense^^^^
No, your absolutely right, nobody starts a race at an rpm that low but doing a WOT pull from a low rpm will give a good idea of the part-throttle torque around 2k-2.5k. (the under the curve power)
Old 08-15-2008 | 02:25 PM
  #48  
s346k's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,433
Likes: 1
From: johnson co.
Default

Originally Posted by 98camaroLS1M6
Nice results, yeah a pull from 2300-2500rpm would be nice to see the torque.
i love how everyone says this...yet no one considers how often they'll be pulling 2300rpm at WOT. 99% of the time you're at that low of an rpm you're hardly on the gas in an effort to go fast. i'd guess the part throttle differences of the cams at low rpm and low load are within 10lb ft which would be unnoticable given the conditions.

but...whatever.
Old 08-15-2008 | 02:46 PM
  #49  
98camaroLS1M6's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,373
Likes: 0
From: Cherry Hill, NJ
Default

We could argue about this all day but the point of this thread is Tick Performance's new cam. It makes great torque b/c of an earlier IVC point which creates more cylinder pressure hence more torque. You would be surprised how certain cams can make 30-40 more rwtq at part throttle around 2k because the cam has a higher DCR. Throw some heads on this setup and increase the SCR to 11.5 and the torque would really pick up.
Old 08-15-2008 | 03:30 PM
  #50  
blu1's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast

 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

Originally Posted by s346k
i love how everyone says this...yet no one considers how often they'll be pulling 2300rpm at WOT. 99% of the time you're at that low of an rpm you're hardly on the gas in an effort to go fast. i'd guess the part throttle differences of the cams at low rpm and low load are within 10lb ft which would be unnoticable given the conditions.

but...whatever.
Wrong, and I have personal experience on the same car with different cams.
Old 08-15-2008 | 05:49 PM
  #51  
chrs1313's Avatar
10 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,697
Likes: 4
Default

nice results similar to what i made cam only...in a A4, with ls6 intake...

although i did have better bolt ons...i would seriously look into this cam if i didnt already have one...should be the TREX KILLER
Old 08-16-2008 | 11:18 AM
  #52  
Xerxes's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: Olympia, KY
Default

What's the PTVC on a set of PRC stage 2.5 5.3L heads with this cam?
Old 08-16-2008 | 12:07 PM
  #53  
rocksws6's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Default

^ Yeah that's not going to clear. If it only has .060 with the stock heads I would say your going to have to flycut with the 5.3's.
Old 08-16-2008 | 12:43 PM
  #54  
Xerxes's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: Olympia, KY
Default

So I would be looking at PRC Stage 1.0 LS6 heads if I don't want to flycut. Gotcha.
Old 08-16-2008 | 01:41 PM
  #55  
ThirdGenLS1's Avatar
TECH Resident

iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Default

no you wouldn't start a race at that low of a rpm, but you telling me you arn't going to drive the car in that rpm range, or does your car magically go from idle to 3k rpms.

Hey they are the ones to claim great low end power with a big stick so i want to see it
Old 08-16-2008 | 04:10 PM
  #56  
rocksws6's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Xerxes
So I would be looking at PRC Stage 1.0 LS6 heads if I don't want to flycut. Gotcha.
I would just flycut or get some forged pistons. You could mill them heads down and get that compression up then. More power man that's the name of the game.
Old 08-16-2008 | 10:29 PM
  #57  
cbra-klla's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast

iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
From: Summersville, WV
Default

i wish you would have had this cam 2 months ago when you had my motor out!! looks great!
Old 08-17-2008 | 12:27 AM
  #58  
SlowSS_2001's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: North Wilkesboro, NC
Thumbs up

It's not done making power.. Time to get some decent headers and an Intake..
Old 08-17-2008 | 02:28 AM
  #59  
DustinWS6's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Florence, AL
Default

Originally Posted by ThirdGenLS1

Hey they are the ones to claim great low end power with a big stick so i want to see it
I agree
Old 08-17-2008 | 11:43 AM
  #60  
Johns00Z28's Avatar
TECH Regular

iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Germantown, MD
Default

Subscribing!


Quick Reply: Proudly Introducing Tick Performance's Flagship LSx Camshaft: The Polluter



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:01 PM.