MTI Racing's LS1 F-body Magnacharger system now available for mail-order
#62
I can offer a $500 discount if you do not want injectors or the boost-a-pump. Since tuning is a mail order re-tune of your ecm rather than a hand held tuner, there is no discount for leaving the tuning out of the package.
The overall power numbers really depend on your current numbers and which bolt-on's you have. The dynograph I posted is from a vehicle with stock heads and cam but no bolt-ons. You should see similar gains with your car.
The overall power numbers really depend on your current numbers and which bolt-on's you have. The dynograph I posted is from a vehicle with stock heads and cam but no bolt-ons. You should see similar gains with your car.
#64
No, The 122 body is larger and encroaches into the windshield wiper area.
The MTI Racing system uses the 112 and is more than capable to push lots of power. Unless your goal is 700+hp, 112 should be fine.
The MTI Racing system uses the 112 and is more than capable to push lots of power. Unless your goal is 700+hp, 112 should be fine.
#66
Staging Lane
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pine Mountain, AL.
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#68
Staging Lane
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pine Mountain, AL.
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#70
I will contact the owners to see if they will post their feedback.
We installed an MP112 on a customers 2002 WS-6 who had a high mileage SLP 402ci engine. With the overdrive crank damper it produced 9lbs of boost. The car was an automatic which means an additional 5% loss of power from the flywheel to the tires thru the drivetrain. It produced 513rwhp and 531rwtq. Most impressively was that it had over 500ft/lbs of rear wheel torque at 2700rpm's. In a manual trans car these numbers would have been 539rwhp and 558 rwtq with 525tq at 2700rpm's
We installed this system on a M6 2001 SS which had a mild cam, some headwork, and headers. His set-up produced 503rwhp and 472ft/lbs of rear wheel torque with 7lbs of boost
We installed this system on a M6 2001 SS which had a mild cam, some headwork, and headers. His set-up produced 503rwhp and 472ft/lbs of rear wheel torque with 7lbs of boost
#73
I'm about to sell my STS kit and get one of these Maggies, but I'd really like to be able to make more than 600 at the rear wheels without maxing it out and making the IATs outrageous. I already have a 383 built for boost (was built to produce around 1000rwhp with the turbo so it should be bullet proof) and was wondering what I could expect with the 383. I really don't want to have to build a 347 for it since I already have the 383 built and all. Do you think the 383 will be to much for the little 112?
#74
I'm about to sell my STS kit and get one of these Maggies, but I'd really like to be able to make more than 600 at the rear wheels without maxing it out and making the IATs outrageous. I already have a 383 built for boost (was built to produce around 1000rwhp with the turbo so it should be bullet proof) and was wondering what I could expect with the 383. I really don't want to have to build a 347 for it since I already have the 383 built and all. Do you think the 383 will be to much for the little 112?
#76
The maggie is designed more for usable low rpm torque and horsepower rather than peak hp at high rpm's like a turbo. We have installed the 112 on a 402ci engine with an overdrive boost damper and it produced 9#'s of boost. What compression is your 383 running and how much boost are you looking for?