Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

My TURBO 'd 6.0 T/a Sucks!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2009, 04:27 PM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
SD99TA214's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: san diego
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default My TURBO 'd 6.0 T/a Sucks!!!!

I had a whole other thread going about my car but ive changed so much on the car that the specs are to different and the damn thing still wont make power! so ill cut to the chase.

4l60e
vig 3600 (locked during dyno use)
2004 6.0 iron block (stock)
ls1 intake
f-11 , Futral motorsports, 228/230 576/595 112+4
Ported 317's
patriot golds.
T76 with a .96 on center exaust housing
TTI street kit. cast manifold for pass side
3 inch down pipe to a 4 inch straight through exaust mandrel bent out the back
38mm turbosmart waste gate merged back into exaust very nicely.
60lb injectors 60% wot
11.5 afr 12 deg. at wot tuned by me and 2 other reputable tuners.
13 psi!!!!!

470 rwhp!!!??????? im at the end of my ropes guys. what am i missing??

Last edited by SD99TA214; 07-31-2009 at 04:54 PM.
Old 07-31-2009, 04:46 PM
  #2  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
HUNTER02SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Kennesaw, Georgia
Posts: 2,796
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I was always under the impression a decent or good cam for a turbo car would have a wider lobe seperation. 114-116 lobe sep.???
Alos I noticed you only have 12deg. of timing? I would think that needs to be up to 15-16deg. as well.
Old 07-31-2009, 04:51 PM
  #3  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
02NBMFormula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Jax, Fl
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

how does the car feel on the track? what kind of dyno? i thought 60lbs should be able to handle more?
Old 07-31-2009, 04:51 PM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
SD99TA214's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: san diego
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

heres the thread i started when i thought it was my cam from what i gatherd it wasnt my cam but im down to a cam swap
https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-in...urting-me.html

As far as the timing goes im on 91 out here in CA we dont have 93 , besides 3 to 4 degrees of timing wont put me anywhere near the gains im looking for.

Isnt it fair to say people that this combo should be worth 600 whp????
Old 07-31-2009, 04:52 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
frcefed98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 6,907
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Things that stick out:
Converter
Cam
timing at WOT
injectors shouldn't be at 90% for only 470rwhp
tune
Old 07-31-2009, 04:53 PM
  #6  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
SD99TA214's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: san diego
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

track , 7.10s through the 1/8 and it feels good, car wieghs 3760 with me in it.

Oh sorry the duty cycle is 60 not 90 ill fix that.

Dyno jet
Old 07-31-2009, 04:57 PM
  #7  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,598
Received 1,739 Likes on 1,299 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SD99TA214
I had a whole other thread going about my car but ive changed so much on the car that the specs are to different and the damn thing still wont make power! so ill cut to the chase.

4l60e
vig 3600 (locked during dyno use)
2004 6.0 iron block (stock)
ls1 intake
f-11 , Futral motorsports, 228/230 576/595 112+4
Ported 317's
patriot golds.
T76 with a .96 on center exaust housing
TTI street kit. cast manifold for pass side
3 inch down pipe to a 4 inch straight through exaust mandrel bent out the back
38mm turbosmart waste gate merged back into exaust very nicely.
60lb injectors 60% wot
11.5 afr 12 deg. at wot tuned by me and 2 other reputable tuners.
13 psi!!!!!

470 rwhp!!!??????? im at the end of my ropes guys. what am i missing??
That cam is NOT killing 100+RWHP assuming its installed right. Got a graph of it on the dyno?I would agree you should be running a little more timing. Have you done a compression test since its a stock motor? Your intake sucks, but i would be more suspect of the trans slipping.
Old 07-31-2009, 04:57 PM
  #8  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
hellbents10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Spring Lake, MI
Posts: 4,439
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

going from 12-16* could easily net you over 100hp.
Old 07-31-2009, 04:58 PM
  #9  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
SD99TA214's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: san diego
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by frcefed98
Things that stick out:
Converter
Cam
timing at WOT
injectors shouldn't be at 90% for only 470rwhp
tune
Ok but what about them? do you think my converter is coming unlocked or its blowing through it? because when i manualy lock it it stays engauged.

I ve had very cam savy people tell me the cams ok, and i was and still am doubting.

timing i just commented on and injector info fixed.
Old 07-31-2009, 04:59 PM
  #10  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
SD99TA214's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: san diego
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hellbents10
going from 12-16* could easily net you over 100hp.
Old 07-31-2009, 05:01 PM
  #11  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
SD99TA214's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: san diego
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
That cam is NOT killing 100+RWHP assuming its installed right. Got a graph of it on the dyno?I would agree you should be running a little more timing. Have you done a compression test since its a stock motor? Your intake sucks, but i would be more suspect of the trans slipping.
i can post one up tonight but the graph looks good and smooth just not to high on the x axis if you catch my drift
Old 07-31-2009, 05:02 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
1320's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: LV NV
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Whats the 60 ft, the mph...etc etc....

Tires? Gears?

Im not convinced yet anything is wrong just because of a dyno number. Dyno numbers are worthless, dyno tuning can be very valuable.
Old 07-31-2009, 05:03 PM
  #13  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,598
Received 1,739 Likes on 1,299 Posts

Default

Then the trans prolli isnt slipping. Put some more timing in it and see what happens.
Old 07-31-2009, 05:10 PM
  #14  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
SD99TA214's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: san diego
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1320
Whats the 60 ft, the mph...etc etc....

Tires? Gears?

Im not convinced yet anything is wrong just because of a dyno number. Dyno numbers are worthless, dyno tuning can be very valuable.
1.70 60ft 99 mph 7.10 micky thompson 275/45/r17
7.73 gears.
Old 07-31-2009, 05:10 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (77)
 
black98ws6ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: louisville,ky
Posts: 2,107
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1320
Whats the 60 ft, the mph...etc etc....

Tires? Gears?

Im not convinced yet anything is wrong just because of a dyno number. Dyno numbers are worthless, dyno tuning can be very valuable.
Agreed. I would want to know the incrementals of the timeslip.

I would also increase the timing some at peak torque and even more afterwards. Dont rely on the dyno to give you all the info use the same changes at the track.

EDIT: The dyno is not telling the full story to trap 99 at 37xx lbs you are making more then the dyno is showing.
Old 07-31-2009, 05:13 PM
  #16  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (27)
 
SD99TA214's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: san diego
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by black98ws6ta
Agreed. I would want to know the incrementals of the timeslip.

I would also increase the timing some at peak torque and even more afterwards. Dont rely on the dyno to give you all the info use the same changes at the track.

If your car is trapping in the 100's in the 1/8 the dyno is not telling the full story.
i wouldnt rely on the numbers if i felt my car should make 550 and it made 520 but if i expect 600 or 650 from 13 psi out of a t76 on a 6.0 and i get 470ish

and then my buddy puts his aps stock ls1 with a zo6 cam and some stock 317s and makes 570. how am i supposd to feel? sure i can beat him but power is speed so if im fast with 470 ill be that much faster with 570. ya know?
Old 07-31-2009, 05:16 PM
  #17  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (77)
 
black98ws6ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: louisville,ky
Posts: 2,107
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SD99TA214
i wouldnt rely on the numbers if i felt my car should make 550 and it made 520 but if i expect 600 or 650 from 13 psi out of a t76 on a 6.0 and i get 470ish

and then my buddy puts his aps stock ls1 with a zo6 cam and some stock 317s and makes 570. how am i supposd to feel? sure i can beat him but power is speed so if im fast with 470 ill be that much faster with 570. ya know?
The fact that you are beating car's that dyno better then you should give you a clue as to what's going on.
Old 07-31-2009, 05:20 PM
  #18  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
HUNTER02SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Kennesaw, Georgia
Posts: 2,796
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Your injectors should be fine. I made over 900rwhp with 60lb. injectors.
The only reason i suggest cam is the duration is not that great along with a tight lobe sep. BUT, for 600whp, this cam should be fine! We really need to see a graph. 100mph in the 8th. isn't bad either. Also keep in mind a good rule of thumb is this. At 15lbs of boost you should be fairly close to DOUBLING your motors N/A hp. If your motor makes 350hp N/A then you should be close to 700hp at 15lbs of boost.
Old 07-31-2009, 05:27 PM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
1320's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: LV NV
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by black98ws6ta
Agreed. I would want to know the incrementals of the timeslip.

I would also increase the timing some at peak torque and even more afterwards. Dont rely on the dyno to give you all the info use the same changes at the track.

EDIT: The dyno is not telling the full story to trap 99 at 37xx lbs you are making more then the dyno is showing.
I agree %100. 4-5 more degrees (water meth or good gas if needed) and it ll pick up 2-3 mph. 3780 going 7.0's high 6's is averaging more the 470. Seems real good considering the 275 17 tire. A 275 -60-15 I bet would help too.
Old 07-31-2009, 05:38 PM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Vcious04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alvarado, Texas
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1320
I agree %100. 4-5 more degrees (water meth or good gas if needed) and it ll pick up 2-3 mph. 3780 going 7.0's high 6's is averaging more the 470. Seems real good considering the 275 17 tire. A 275 -60-15 I bet would help too.
+1, My old ls1 coupe made 430rwhp, weighed 3100lbs with me in it and ran 6.70's @ 102.

I would say the dyno reads low or is wrong. I would say at that weight and mph you are probably making 550 at least.


Quick Reply: My TURBO 'd 6.0 T/a Sucks!!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 AM.