Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

E85..with FI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 12:08 AM
  #1  
black98ws6ta's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (77)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,107
Likes: 2
From: louisville,ky
Default E85..with FI

I have heard some very good stuff about e85 and it's resistance to detonation. I was wanting to hear some feedback from guy's that are currently using it. I am also wondering what it is like in comparison to c16, cost not being a factor. If anyone has any experience with e85 and a stock motor that would be right up my alley. Thanks.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 12:24 AM
  #2  
bongva's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Default

i hear you can run more timing with e85 than you can with race gas.

also requires about 30% more fuel than normal gas
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 12:39 AM
  #3  
BoostnTBSS's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Default

I run 10.5-1 and 30 deg of timing and 15 psi boost
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 12:42 AM
  #4  
black98ws6ta's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (77)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,107
Likes: 2
From: louisville,ky
Default

Originally Posted by BoostnTBSS
I run 10.5-1 and 30 deg of timing and 15 psi boost
You have any comparison to gas or did you go straight e85? 10.5:1 with the wideband still in gas mode?
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 12:49 AM
  #5  
stevied916's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 546
Likes: 1
From: Sacramento, CA
Default

For some reason I got knock around 25-2700 rpm with e85. Had to back down the timing at those rpm's. Def more torque though
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 01:00 AM
  #6  
DeltaT's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,404
Likes: 1
Default

Widebands work off Lambda, O2 content. So stoichiometric with E85 is still going to read ~14.7 on the AFR gauge (like you said, set up for gas), unless you have a wideband controller that allows you to select different fuels:

Lamda . A/F Gas . A/F E70 . A/F E85 . A/F E100
1.027. . 15.1 . . . .10.89 . . . 10.03 . . . .9.25
1.014. . 14.9 . . . .10.74 . . . .9.90 . . . .9.13
1.000. 14.700 . . 10.600 . . .9.765 . . .9.0078 Stoichiometric
0.986. . 14.5 . . . .10.46 . . . .9.63 . . . .8.89
0.973. . 14.3 . . . .10.31 . . . .9.50 . . . .8.76
0.959. . 14.1 . . . .10.17 . . . .9.37 . . . .8.64
0.946. . 13.9 . . . .10.02 . . . .9.23 . . . .8.52
0.932. . 13.7 . . . . 9.88 . . . . 9.10 . . . .8.40
0.918. . 13.5 . . . . 9.73 . . . . 8.97 . . . .8.27
0.905. . 13.3 . . . . 9.59 . . . . 8.84 . . . .8.15

So you can tune very similar to using gas. I am switching to E85 with the new motor and will start my tune at 11:1 and gradually lean it out until it's around 11.6:1 under WOT or anything above 5# of boost. The Buick turbo guys are pretty happy around 24-25 degrees of timing, but like above, you can get more aggressive if you know what you are doing and have good knock detection/correction.

Jim
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 03:19 AM
  #7  
otherwhitemeat's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 758
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by bongva
i hear you can run more timing with e85 than you can with race gas.

also requires about 30% more fuel than normal gas
Ummm.... NO you can't run as much timing, and it requires 15-20% more fuel. I will not make the power it can on race gas...
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 03:25 AM
  #8  
otherwhitemeat's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 758
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by black98ws6ta
I have heard some very good stuff about e85 and it's resistance to detonation. I was wanting to hear some feedback from guy's that are currently using it. I am also wondering what it is like in comparison to c16, cost not being a factor. If anyone has any experience with e85 and a stock motor that would be right up my alley. Thanks.
E85 does not compare to C16! C16 is a race fuel, and you can run full timing and have some room for error.....not the case will E85....and E85 will NOT make the power that C16 can, cause the tune up has to be so safe/lame or not so aggesive to run E85 that it can really robb a lot of power from the combenation.....
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 08:06 AM
  #9  
hellbents10's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,439
Likes: 4
From: Spring Lake, MI
Default

We run and tune some FI cars on E85. It is not as good as c16, but pretty close to being as good as 110. I tune it like 100 oct fuel. We have a twin turbo viper here on it and it makes 1060/1145 to the tires. I run about 17 degrees of advance up top at 17psi vs. 23-24 with c16. I would only go to about 900whp on 93 oct.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 11:01 AM
  #10  
SchuttsR1's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: Hastings, MN
Default

Those are sad numbers for a boosted viper. Mine made 400 more rwhp at 12 psi on e85.
In my opinion e85 is great for forced induction. Just as good as c16. And if you add methanol or water injection you have a almost limitless amount of boost to run as long as you can get the fuel there.

One thing to look out for is when the weather changes like it does here in the Midwest. They change the mixture of the e85 to more petrol so it easier to start on those cold mornings. Just some thing to watch if you do make the switch.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 11:15 AM
  #11  
94 slow's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
From: ca
Default

Originally Posted by DeltaT



So you can tune very similar to using gas. I am switching to E85 with the new motor and will start my tune at 11:1 and gradually lean it out until it's around 11.6:1 under WOT or anything above 5# of boost. The Buick turbo guys are pretty happy around 24-25 degrees of timing, but like above, you can get more aggressive if you know what you are doing and have good knock detection/correction.

Jim
Is this setup going to use a whipple?
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 11:17 AM
  #12  
94 slow's Avatar
TECH Apprentice
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
From: ca
Default

Will the EGT'S be lower on a turbo car running E85?
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 11:28 AM
  #13  
black98ws6ta's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (77)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,107
Likes: 2
From: louisville,ky
Default

Originally Posted by 94 slow
Will the EGT'S be lower on a turbo car running E85?
I've heard they are..but I'm just starting on my research.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 11:28 AM
  #14  
'Trust''s Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,972
Likes: 4
From: Eternity
Default

The good thing about E-85 is it cools substantially better than race gas, but the benefit isnt' enough for me to change.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 12:17 PM
  #15  
Big Bird WS6's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default

you guys talk about the good parts of e-85 but your not talking about the best part.

c16 is what $5.00+ in most places

and e85 is $2.00- in most places.

^^^ that is the best about e85. 105oct gas for under $2. it doesnt get any better
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 12:25 PM
  #16  
black98ws6ta's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (77)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,107
Likes: 2
From: louisville,ky
Default

More like $15 retail for c16 around here, but I did state money not being a factor in my origional post.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 12:43 PM
  #17  
veee8's Avatar
8 Second Club
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh,North Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by otherwhitemeat
E85 does not compare to C16! C16 is a race fuel, and you can run full timing and have some room for error.....not the case will E85....and E85 will NOT make the power that C16 can, cause the tune up has to be so safe/lame or not so aggesive to run E85 that it can really robb a lot of power from the combenation.....
I agree, I pushed it to 24* on E85, and it did not like it with L92 heads.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 12:47 PM
  #18  
black98ws6ta's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (77)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,107
Likes: 2
From: louisville,ky
Default

Originally Posted by veee8
I agree, I pushed it to 24* on E85, and it did not like it with L92 heads.
I have heard people say with e85 the car just lays over and stops making power if it is too lean or too much timing...did you have motor problem's?
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 01:03 PM
  #19  
Big Bird WS6's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
From: Iowa
Default

Originally Posted by black98ws6ta
More like $15 retail for c16 around here, but I did state money not being a factor in my origional post.
well ok you did. but that much price difference i would hate to build a car for c16 only.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2009 | 01:25 PM
  #20  
hellbents10's Avatar
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,439
Likes: 4
From: Spring Lake, MI
Default

Originally Posted by SchuttsR1
Those are sad numbers for a boosted viper. Mine made 400 more rwhp at 12 psi on e85.
In my opinion e85 is great for forced induction. Just as good as c16. And if you add methanol or water injection you have a almost limitless amount of boost to run as long as you can get the fuel there.

One thing to look out for is when the weather changes like it does here in the Midwest. They change the mixture of the e85 to more petrol so it easier to start on those cold mornings. Just some thing to watch if you do make the switch.

Good for you, you had a Viper that would make 800whp on the engine alone then. We were working with something that would make 450 to the tires on motor alone. No bogus numbers numbers here 2 atmospheres generally doubles hp output.

I would like to see your Viper that made 1450+ to the tires on 12psi though, must be one hell of a build.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:43 PM.