Heads: 317s vs 243s
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Westland, MI
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My plan is to use 243 (LS6) heads on a turbo motor but have seen others and some one I know say the LQ4 (317) is just as good or better for boosted LS engine.
Any input to this?
Any input to this?
#2
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (31)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
317s have a larger combustion chamber at 72cc for lower compression, 243s have like I think 66cc so most go with the 317 to help aid compression. Nothing wrong with a 243 if your pistons are matched accordingly
#5
8 Second Club
iTrader: (43)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: texas
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i dont think there is a big difference. i think the ls6 heads out flow the 317s by a very small amount up top. when using a compression calculator i came up wiht 9.6:1 on a stock bottom end ls1.
Trending Topics
#8
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Westland, MI
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I am planning on beefing up the bottom end some though not go crazy as I will like to have it survive some abuse for a couple of seasons.
317s seem to be less expensive also.
317s seem to be less expensive also.