First off you dont know a ******* thing. LMR burned holes in 3 of my pistons thanks to 28 degrees timing on a FI car. Real prestigious. Oh and its working out great.

 

ok then it seems like you do not understand anything in my previous post. so i will put it simply for you.

why would sts tell you to run the stock manifolds and not long tubes and wrap the **** out of the exhaust pipes ? if cold exhaust gases spooled the turbo they would not tell you to do that

and if the design was good the automakers would buy the patent or find a way around id. don't forget that a turbo originally was intended for diesel use and i am sure it was patented


i have already explained it to you, but you keep coming up with some BS

 

t76 on a 418 ? that is a little small. a t76 will work good on 347 front mount.
i am surprised that you only see boost at 3000rpm with a 418 and only a t76

 

 

Well I also tune cars and have done so for quite a while now and have no problem saying what I say on the internet to people's faces. I don't act different on the internet then I do in person. Besides, if you wanted to actually "beat the ****" out of somebody for calling you out on your misinformation then grow up. You are acting like a child that doesn't get their way. Besides around here coming up and attacking somebody is a good way to get permanently ventilated.

I never said rear mount turbos don't work nor have I said anything to the OP to try to change his mind so I am not sure what you are even talking about here.

 

See so i dont see how all this **** got started than me not liking that people bash on the RM's. I had stated long ago a front mount is more efficient. There is just no way around it. You dont see me getting on a front mount post saying negative things about them. So i just dont see why on every rear mount post someone has to get on their and bash them. Because yes its a fact they arent as good as a front mount. But to me it just wasnt worth having to do so much to the engine compartment. Just like i stated before. Everything is all about preference. For me it was RM. Just being different with it. I am trying to agree with you here man , i am just saying that it gets me all uptight how on every RM post someone insists on bashing.

 

I agree, i had the setup on a 347 but like i said before LMR left my timing at 28 degrees on a motor i told them was 10:5 CR so it was only a matter of time before they melted. I will eventually go bigger than that but this turbo was so new i hated to just ditch it. STS says it would come in sooner with manifolds and such but i run big tube headers but im not trying to squeeze everything out of it, just have a fun street car.

 

All I can say, and excuse me if this offends anyone, a big Jesus H Christ.

 

^^ wecome to the world of the rear-mount turbos... just give garth a call

 

lol definetly a never ending war

 

N/a ftw!!

 

no way, i wanna see you squeeze out 1000hp NA out of a 347 for less money then a turbo/blower 347 set up

 

you tell that to mr MOREBOOST, he does not believe me that hot air spools the turbo better then cold air

 

19.1 COMPRESSION with nitromethane spin it to 10k maybe LMAO!

 

You people are killin me!!LOL We're probaly going to have to pay for this entertainment before it's all over!

 

I love you too elias!! Like they said its going to be around for a awhile... Get us some pics of the project Jenn I'd love to see

 

For some reason this remind me of something i heard once on a really rediculous movie....


To funny!!!

 

less moving parts to worry about with N/A... no belts, no turbines, no oil lines, no pumps, piping...

 

I will post them when we get started. Autorama is coming up, so I have to help my friends get ready for that first before we can get started on my car. We will get started in early March from the sounds of it.

 

I know of people who have paid money to have STS kits de-installed due to all the issues.

The oiling system is terrible.