Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

LY5 5.3L suitable for boost?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 06:18 AM
  #1  
gotzy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Portsmouth, England (but an Aussie)
Default LY5 5.3L suitable for boost?

Hi People,

I'm in the UK where cheap LS motors are pretty rare but I've come across a 2007 LY5 5.3L that I'd like to do a cheap turbo motor for a sleeper project.

Plans would be to pretty much copy Parish's Fairmont build for a gen 1 RX7. So basically a budget turbo etc with a glide for some cheapish fun. No daily driver stuff but a street car and decent fuel and meth wouldn't be a problem.

From what I can see these motors have 9.9:1 compression ratio that isn't great but whats the general opinion on these for a boosted donor motor?

A mate in LA works for Isuzu and can get L92 heads cheap, do they have a bigger chamber that would help lower the compression for boost?

Thanks in advance

Steve
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 06:32 AM
  #2  
TurboAv's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,455
Likes: 1
From: Tonopah, AZ
Default

I believe the L92's won't work due to bore size. Maybe the 317 heads? Do you know the combustion chamber size of the LY5 heads?
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 09:34 AM
  #3  
gotzy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Portsmouth, England (but an Aussie)
Default

The only thing I've been able to find was on a truck forum which said castings 799 or 243 with 64.5 cc chambers.

Just found this which backs up your comment on the bore size, cheers for that - http://www.crateenginedepot.com/stor...ty-W63C10.aspx

Been looking on Performance trucks and the 317's would drop the compression a point so would do the trick.

What's peoples views on boosting on top of 9.9:1 compression?

Would ultimately like to been in the 500 - 550 range.

Thanks

Steve
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 03:02 PM
  #4  
pwrtrip75's Avatar
TECH Addict
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,386
Likes: 9
From: Janesville, WI
Default

I dont know the difference between the LY5 and the 5.3 I have, but mine came out of 2000 silverado. But the 317 heads on mine drop it down to 8.6:1 compression.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2017 | 12:39 PM
  #5  
JohnSolo's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default 317 heads

Hey Gotzy,

So, I am looking to Turbo my Avalanche and it has a 5.3 LY5 engine. my question is, will the 317 heads work? I would like to know if they worked for you?
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2017 | 12:47 PM
  #6  
JoeNova's Avatar
Restricted User
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 7,192
Likes: 109
From: Ohio
Default

Lots of people boost the higher compression 5.3s with no issues.

This isn't the 90s.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2017 | 01:15 PM
  #7  
AnotherWs6's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 2,670
Likes: 38
From: Westchester, NY
Default

Originally Posted by JoeNova
Lots of people boost the higher compression 5.3s with no issues.

This isn't the 90s.
Lol. You mean 8.0:1 with a 6-71?
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2017 | 01:43 PM
  #8  
JohnSolo's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default Thanks

Originally Posted by JoeNova
Lots of people boost the higher compression 5.3s with no issues.

This isn't the 90s.
I just found out that I have the 243 heads. So I am thinking I will be OK with the stock heads.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2017 | 07:06 PM
  #9  
ls1charged's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,477
Likes: 3
From: FL
Default

Im running a 7875 .96 @ 17psi on a LY5 right now, the stock heads are 243 which makes compression 9.9... i swapped my stock 241s on because it has a bigger combustion chamber, im guessing its in the 9.25:1 area now.... i wouldnt do 317s because mine is pretty sluggish out of boost as it is, if i could do it over i would have used a bigger cam or even stayed with 243 heads, higher compression and boost is becoming more common with proper tuning...9.9 isnt even very high anyways
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48 AM.