Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

396ci LT4, YSI and 15lb of boost dyno result :(

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-29-2010, 05:08 PM
  #101  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
kazdevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I cant agree more with what Mike said. The boost gauge this time was reading 20~ psi before even it hit the rev limit-at the IC inlet-. while the outlet boost is 15 psi just before it hits the rev limit.
Attached Files
Old 12-29-2010, 05:15 PM
  #102  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

You must have some seriously **** intercooler ?


Although it also raises the question....just how different is a solid roller profile compared to a hydraulic ?
Old 12-29-2010, 05:18 PM
  #103  
Gingervitis Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
slow67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: DFW
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Don't forget solid rollers generally have more area under the curve, so they many times will make similar power with less .050 duration.
Old 12-29-2010, 05:33 PM
  #104  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
kazdevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Hyd cam: 248/254 .601/0.621 114

Solid cam: 236/247 .632/.668 114 (+4)
Old 12-29-2010, 05:41 PM
  #105  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

on paper the stats dont look much different...but what do the graphs for are under the curve actually look like for each cam
Old 12-29-2010, 06:20 PM
  #106  
Grr
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Grr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fargo ND
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

definately intercooler. Look into going front mount, i had around .5psi of pressure loss on my ebay frontmount at 12psi, couldnt tell exactly but it was in the .5 area by watching the guage. You will like that 8" pulley, heres what i did:
forged 355 9.4:1
STOCK heads, not a drop of modification
918 springs with Ti retainers
1.54:1 pro magnums
ported LT1 intake
stock throttle body
pacesetter headers, dual 3" exhaust
basically had the cam lloyd elliot mentioned, 226/232 .590/.600 114lsa 110Icl if i recall
YSi
FMIC
T56 mcleod twin, 9" rear

I only had it on the dyno one time, that was before i made the pulley setup. It made 11psi boost at the intake, A/F was in the 10.0 area and 14* timing on pump gas. I was using the stock Ecm in 2-bar and was way the hell off on my baseline. It threw the belt after 3 pulls when i finally got the AFRs to register at 10.0 (it was in the 9s to start) and i had to go home.
It made 522whp/478wtq on a mustang in that configuration, picking up 40whp every pull as i figured out the tune.
Later I fixed some issues and put a new belt on, with the crappy air inlet off and it made 20psi, so that was also a big restriction

I made a bunch of changes that winter switching to 10-rib with a manual tensioner and it was making roughly 675whp with the same stock heads just getting the blower setup to actually work doing 15psi and running 11.5afr at 24* timing


Old 12-30-2010, 05:39 PM
  #107  
OWN3D BY MY PROF!
iTrader: (176)
 
Beaflag VonRathburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Jax Beach, Florida
Posts: 9,149
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
on paper the stats dont look much different...but what do the graphs for are under the curve actually look like for each cam
With the lash the solid is a smaller cam. I think the cam was ground with his operating range in mind. I don't think it would turn too much more RPM.
Old 12-30-2010, 05:45 PM
  #108  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

Also raises the question....would a solid roller be worthwhile for an LSx ? Especially if you wanted to run a good 7krpm often ?
Old 12-30-2010, 06:10 PM
  #109  
OWN3D BY MY PROF!
iTrader: (176)
 
Beaflag VonRathburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Jax Beach, Florida
Posts: 9,149
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
Also raises the question....would a solid roller be worthwhile for an LSx ? Especially if you wanted to run a good 7krpm often ?
I am putting together a stock L92 bottom end with a set of TFS 225s and 2'' kooks headers. The heads are setup for crane polymatrix adjustable rockers. Patrick G was helping me with my setup until I got derailed by money issues and sponsors providing me with the wrong parts, but... He mentioned that with already having the parts for the solid roller setup it would be a no brainer. He mentioned a tight lash setup for drivability.

I think in more of an extreme combo turning lots of RPMs it would depend on if your oiling system is up to the task. LTLHOMER used to have Harlan's old twin PT66 kit. It was a 347, ported stock 241 heads, and a solid roller setup that blew at 8200rpms. It ran 8.78 at 21psi and this was 2006.

I think with the advances we've had in engine and tuning technology a solid roller in a setup like that starts to lose some merit. Don't get me wrong as I think it has it's places, but Mark Koehler ran 7.4- on a hydraulic setup. He is now going to a solid setup, but I think it depends on your car and preferances. With the monster ramp rates on cams and accelerated rate rockers out there now you can get the same kind of aggressive lobes if not exceed them with a hydraulic roller.
Old 09-17-2011, 02:03 AM
  #110  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
kazdevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

This dyno run done with 8'' crank, KNN filter #RC-5171,meth injection, no intercooler.Still waiting for the cog setup from RMCR.
Attached Thumbnails 396ci LT4, YSI and 15lb of boost dyno result :(-753rwhp.jpg  
Old 09-18-2011, 08:08 PM
  #111  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
white01ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 656
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

How were the IATs with only meth?
Old 09-19-2011, 06:53 PM
  #112  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
kazdevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

with meth ,IAT was 35 deg c. I had the 375 ml/min jet fitted if i remember correctly.
Old 09-20-2011, 02:47 PM
  #113  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
white01ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 656
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kazdevil
with meth ,IAT was 35 deg c. I had the 375 ml/min jet fitted if i remember correctly.
95 F is really good for no intercooler and meth only. Did you try a dyno without filter?

Makes me want to bypass my twin intercoolers and do a meth only test. Getting IATs below ambient currently, but probably losing boost from all the restriction.



Quick Reply: 396ci LT4, YSI and 15lb of boost dyno result :(



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 AM.