Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Who is using the TSP 228R cam in a turbo set up?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-14-2010, 01:14 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
1980LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Appleton, WI
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Who is using the TSP 228R cam in a turbo set up?

So who is using the TSP 228R cam in their turbo set up? I am thinking of using it in my LS1 turbo set up for my Datsun.

I am using the following parts in my 2002 LS1...

317 heads with PRC double springs (.650" max)
6.0 MLS head gaskets
Yella Terra 1.7 none adjustable RR
Stock pistons and rods
LS6 intake
60# Siemens injectors


TSP is saying its a good cam for low end TQ and the turbo will build boost for the higher RPM TQ. Just curious what the guys with the cam think. If I dont find a used LS6 cam or GT7 cam soon I will probably go with this one.
Old 12-14-2010, 04:38 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Ryans99ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OH & MI
Posts: 1,482
Received 74 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

just go with it man. ive seen it over and over, most cams that put up good numbers NA do well when boosted. The overlap on the cam isnt too bad and wont bleed off that much boost, plus if anything it may help your motor survive longer because the cylinder pressures wont be as high.

my turbo build is going to be with my cam that has about the same overlap as a 228r. everyone is going to say you should just go with ls6 because its cheaper and you should, if you dont already the cam but if you have the 228 already, roll with it.
Old 12-15-2010, 02:22 AM
  #3  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
Snyper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I run a 228/228 .588/.588@114 in my turbo LS2 and I absolutely love it. You can barely tell the car is cammed with a full exhaust on it behaves like stock on the street.
Old 12-15-2010, 04:29 AM
  #4  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
slowblackbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Savannah,TN
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i figured you would want something with a higher lsa for a turbo?
Old 12-15-2010, 03:19 PM
  #5  
Restricted User
iTrader: (17)
 
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: WPB, FL
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ryans99ls1
just go with it man. ive seen it over and over, most cams that put up good numbers NA do well when boosted. The overlap on the cam isnt too bad and wont bleed off that much boost, plus if anything it may help your motor survive longer because the cylinder pressures wont be as high.

my turbo build is going to be with my cam that has about the same overlap as a 228r. everyone is going to say you should just go with ls6 because its cheaper and you should, if you dont already the cam but if you have the 228 already, roll with it.
This is especially true of the smaller cams such as the one mentioned by the OP. If you were starting out with a max effort NA cam and then going turbo, then not so much.
Old 12-16-2010, 11:20 PM
  #6  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
1980LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Appleton, WI
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I ended up getting a 2002 LS6 cam for $100 on the corvette forum so I'll just be running that for now. Seems like those cams work pretty well and they are cheap!

Thanks for the info though guys!
Old 08-23-2012, 04:41 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
JoshuaGrooms83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Locust Grove, VA
Posts: 2,022
Received 95 Likes on 81 Posts

Default

anymore input form people using 228r cams with turbos?
Old 08-23-2012, 04:45 PM
  #8  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Those specs are great for a turbo set-up.

Those lobes are another story.
Old 09-01-2014, 04:12 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
LQ4-E39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,320
Received 119 Likes on 84 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Martin@Tick
Those specs are great for a turbo set-up.

Those lobes are another story.
Bump, bringing this back from the dead. Can you elaborate on that? I currently have a 228R installed and love it. Just wondering if it'd be worth keeping when I eventually go turbo.
Old 09-04-2014, 07:13 PM
  #10  
Launching!
 
IMPATIENT 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: hugo okla.
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I run the 228r 112 with a pair of on3 70's a2w blowthru carbd 5.3 and love it!! I run it in my dragboat and im killing bbc powered boats with it.according to my impellor chart im making alil over 1000hp at 7300 & i turn the motor 7400 @ 18lbs...above 5500 sucka is jus insane and keeps making more power the more boost i lay to it.ive gta change impellors to a bigger cut to absorb more hp soon and ill try to lay 20lbs to it and rpm about 7200
Old 09-04-2014, 09:10 PM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Clean94Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I read somewhere about people using this cam. Alot of the newer cam guys claimed the lobes are to aggressive for boost. I think the term is unstable valve train. Speed Inc. TU cams run the same lobes and they claim you wont have problems. Older turbo people say they work great. Chevy VS Ford discussion.
Old 09-06-2014, 05:19 PM
  #12  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

I prefer a softer initial opening ramp and a softer seating ramp with my boost camshafts.

XER lobes don't really have the softest opening ramp and seating ramps. Jerk values are higher than a LSK lobe!
Old 09-07-2014, 02:10 PM
  #13  
On The Tree
 
Jetn3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin@Tick
I prefer a softer initial opening ramp and a softer seating ramp with my boost camshafts.

XER lobes don't really have the softest opening ramp and seating ramps. Jerk values are higher than a LSK lobe!
Are you able to grind a cam like a 228r or 224r with turbo friendly lobes?
Old 09-07-2014, 04:49 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Clean94Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jetn3
Are you able to grind a cam like a 228r or 224r with turbo friendly lobes?
I believe TSP can do the same grind on different lobes. The lift will probably be different.
Old 09-07-2014, 05:21 PM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
99Bluz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: C. V., Kalifornia
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Any of the sponsors here that spec cams can do that, since that would still be considered a custom grind. If you want to stick with Comp Cam lobes then look at the Xtreme RPM High Lift lobes, they have a 53* ramp rate, which is fairly mild(XE-R is 49*) and the lift is slightly lower(about .568"/224*, .571"/228*) than the XE-R lobes used on the TSP 220r,224r, 228r cams. Now if you're just wanting a shelf grid, NOT a custom grind with mild (boost friendly) cam lobes, then Cam Motion offer a good selection, and a few Turbo cam also. With any other brand of cams you just need to know the advertised duration and the .05" lift Duration to get the ramp rate/s.

Last edited by 99Bluz28; 09-07-2014 at 05:35 PM.
Old 09-07-2014, 09:37 PM
  #16  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jetn3
Are you able to grind a cam like a 228r or 224r with turbo friendly lobes?
I already have!

Our Stage 1 LS1/LS6 Turbo cam is 227/227 .624/.598 114+5.

The lift is higher yes, but the seating ramps and opening ramps are much different. The ramp off and on the seat is slowed up by added duration in those lift ranges. The XE-R lobes have less duration in the seating and opening lift ranges thus accelerating the tappet of the lifter quicker up the initial ramp and onto the flank of the lobe.
Old 09-08-2014, 07:26 AM
  #17  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (19)
 
oscs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,903
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I ran a 228R N/A and boosted and it worked great in both applications. I'd still be using it if I hadn't destroyed it when a few cam bearing spun .
Old 09-08-2014, 07:29 AM
  #18  
On The Tree
 
munn79ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: indianapolis
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i am running pretty much the exact setup you are but with tick stage 1 cam and only 7lbs of boost for now. car is at the dyno right now hope to get it back this week. cam has a little chop at idle but nothing crazy.
Old 09-12-2014, 07:02 AM
  #19  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
hfthe3rd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Buffalo , NY
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I wonder how bad a turbo will pair up with the tourqer v3
Old 10-19-2014, 09:54 PM
  #20  
Tenured Member
iTrader: (4)
 
SMOKY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Just bumping this up with some new info. Im running the sbe ls1, 228r with the Chinese gt45, typhoon intake, and stock heads put down 525hp and 555tq at 8lbs through an unlocked 4l80e and 9". Makes for a fun street car


Quick Reply: Who is using the TSP 228R cam in a turbo set up?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:11 AM.