Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Recommend me a turbo!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 25, 2011 | 12:49 AM
  #1  
IWGF's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
From: Aztec, NM
Default Recommend me a turbo!

Hey guys,
I'm getting ready to start my turbo build (finally) and am picking up my hotside (truck mani kit) on thursday. I'll be running a 38mm wastegate and I have a T4 flange.
Other specs are as follows:
Stock bottom end
TEA stg 2.5 5.3 heads (may swap out for 317s)
TSP 228r cam
LS6 intake
6spd tranny (when it ***** out, I'll be putting in a TH400)
Dual walbros and 60lb injectors
MWC 9" (3.90s right now, will be swapping for 3.25s or 3.08s)
Anything I'm forgetting?

I was thinking a TC76 but I'm not sure what A/R I should run or other specifics. Help me out
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2011 | 12:54 AM
  #2  
BottleFedZ346's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: Orlando Fl.
Default

A 76mm would be fine as far as a backside i would go with a .96 as any smaller will most likely choke up top!

I would deff. swap to 317 heads if i were you i'd swap out that cam as well for a LS6 cam but thats just me goodluck!
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2011 | 12:57 AM
  #3  
IWGF's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 0
From: Aztec, NM
Default

I think I'm gonna leave the cam alone, I know it's not the BEST, but it won't be bad. Might as well do a 317 swap, they're better for boost and I can sell my heads for a decent price.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2011 | 01:02 AM
  #4  
SPOOLIN Z28's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 250
Likes: 1
From: LAS VEGAS, NV
Default

give rob at modular turbo a buzz! he took real good care of me when i was in the same boat. and he has all other essentials you might nee
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2011 | 01:04 AM
  #5  
BottleFedZ346's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: Orlando Fl.
Default

Originally Posted by IWGF
I think I'm gonna leave the cam alone, I know it's not the BEST, but it won't be bad. Might as well do a 317 swap, they're better for boost and I can sell my heads for a decent price.
Your right it shouldnt be to bad, although i couldnt tell you what would make more power since im no cam expert i just know that they are a awesome cam when it comes to boost......
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2011 | 07:05 AM
  #6  
Phil99vette's Avatar
7 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 9
From: Port Tobacco, MD
Default

What size crossover tube, port the manifolds and smooth out the radius coming into the exhaust runners.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2011 | 01:43 PM
  #7  
MaxxMitchell's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
From: Shawnee KS
Default

For what he is doing, untouched manifolds will make plenty of power.

I would be more concerned about the small wastegate on a stock bottom end. The 38mm may only be able to control the boost down to 8-11lbs.

TC76 with a .96 A/R would be a good choice, along with any 76-78mm T4 turbo with a .96 exhaust housing.

You still need to spec out your cold side with a bov as well. Plus you still need to either tune it with the maf, or SD.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2011 | 02:32 PM
  #8  
BottleFedZ346's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: Orlando Fl.
Default

I would go with a JGS 50mm wastegate just to be safe and a 2.5 crossover should do the trick......
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2011 | 03:55 PM
  #9  
Phil99vette's Avatar
7 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 9
From: Port Tobacco, MD
Default

Originally Posted by MaxxMitchell
For what he is doing, untouched manifolds will make plenty of power.

I would be more concerned about the small wastegate on a stock bottom end. The 38mm may only be able to control the boost down to 8-11lbs.

TC76 with a .96 A/R would be a good choice, along with any 76-78mm T4 turbo with a .96 exhaust housing.

You still need to spec out your cold side with a bov as well. Plus you still need to either tune it with the maf, or SD.
Sure it will work but a free mod is a free mod. It doesn't cost anything to touch up the headers assuming you have a die grinder which almost everyone should have if they are doing their install. Truck manifolds combined with a 2" crossover would be a nice combination for a street car. You dont really need a 2.5" crossover at that power level.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2011 | 06:01 PM
  #10  
JAX04's Avatar
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 1
From: Indy
Default

****, if i could do it over again, (i guess i could) for this street machine, i wouldve went with a 2" cross over myself.

TC unit is small and easy to package. Im with phil on free mods as well
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2011 | 06:08 PM
  #11  
yelo04goat's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: San Diego/ from the 316
Default

when would goin to a 2.5 be best? why would 2 be better keep volicty up??
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2011 | 06:10 PM
  #12  
nodrok's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Default

got a turbonetics t76 with a .96 ar brand new not in box. If interested pm me. I will be running a jgs 50mm wastegate (this was recommended by forced inductions). I Have a slightly different set up though.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2011 | 06:17 PM
  #13  
code4's Avatar
9 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Phil99vette
Sure it will work but a free mod is a free mod. It doesn't cost anything to touch up the headers assuming you have a die grinder which almost everyone should have if they are doing their install. Truck manifolds combined with a 2" crossover would be a nice combination for a street car. You dont really need a 2.5" crossover at that power level.

I've noticed you comment on crossover size a couple of times. Would a 2.5" hurt performance somehow? Just curious, I have 2 cars running tc76's.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2011 | 06:29 PM
  #14  
yelo04goat's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: San Diego/ from the 316
Default

im building my setup soon so i would like to know whats best and why....

code4~ want to PM me some details on your cars running the TC like powerband and stuff
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2011 | 06:59 PM
  #15  
Phil99vette's Avatar
7 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 9
From: Port Tobacco, MD
Default

Originally Posted by yelo04goat
when would goin to a 2.5 be best? why would 2 be better keep volicty up??
Turbos are all about velocity. We run a 2.5" crossover on my setup and make over 2000hp. The pipe size was determined with a calculator, for a 346" making 15# of boost targeting 600-650hp, 2" would work fantastic. With turbos its all about velocity, you could probably drop down to a 2" crossover and quite possibly increase your turbine A/R and still spool faster.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2011 | 07:05 PM
  #16  
Phil99vette's Avatar
7 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 9
From: Port Tobacco, MD
Default

Originally Posted by code4
I've noticed you comment on crossover size a couple of times. Would a 2.5" hurt performance somehow? Just curious, I have 2 cars running tc76's.
A 2.5" crossover would take longer to build your drive pressure increasing lag...

Your tube size determines airflow velocity, the larger the tube the more airflow required to reach your turbine drive pressure and the longer the air has to cool down. A properly sized system works wonders. If I build a basic 346" shooting for less than 700hp, it would have 1.5" header tubes and 2" crossover.

You got 2 motors, 346" and 427", everyone still seems to think you need to run 1 3/4" and 2.5" on a 346 but thats what alot of people run on the big motors.

Whats a standard AFR 205 exhaust port, 1.44 x 1.60?
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2011 | 07:25 PM
  #17  
yelo04goat's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: San Diego/ from the 316
Default

thanks phil seem like i will be ok goin for around 700-800 and the 2 inch..
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2011 | 08:03 PM
  #18  
Phil99vette's Avatar
7 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 9
From: Port Tobacco, MD
Default

Originally Posted by yelo04goat
thanks phil seem like i will be ok goin for around 700-800 and the 2 inch..
Do dual 2" with a quality merge and a single 2.75" going to the turbo, it will be more than enough to make 800hp if not more. The airflow numbers show room for growth...At a 346" with 30# of boost(1100hp) and 92% ve is when you probably need to step up the tube size.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2011 | 10:14 AM
  #19  
Phil99vette's Avatar
7 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,758
Likes: 9
From: Port Tobacco, MD
Default

Quoted from another thread...
Originally Posted by TracyRR
hey phil, you nailed it again...! I finished the new 2" cold side and it made a BIG difference....power, spool and even with drivability on tip in. Just to recap what i've done the past month, i fabbed an entirely new hot and cold side twin rear mount system and relocated the turbo's up and in for better ground clearence/straighter shot. I had a twin STS system before the changes and it worked well for what it was (683rwhp at 14 pounds). I changed the hot side from dual 2.5" all the way to the turbo's to dual 2.25" and then stepped down to 2" just before the turbo's. I also installed larger housings at the same time, went to t3 .82's from .63's. The hot side change made for quicker spool with less backpressure (with larger exh housings). Then I changed the cold side from dual 1.75" to dual 2" and also shortened the cold side piping at least four feet per side. With the new system, it transformed the car!! I played a bit on the way to work this morning and it is stupid fast now (relative term)! It comes in quicker and much harder versus the STS system. I will try to take some pics tonight to show my new system. This weekend I'll do a backpressure test and update with results. p.s.... i moved my hp goal up to 900+rwhp!! I think i'm there now under higher boost (22 - 24 pounds or so). Boost is so addictive......Thanks for all of the help!
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2011 | 04:02 PM
  #20  
yelo04goat's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: San Diego/ from the 316
Default

good info... so 2 inch on the crossover

and keep the cold side small too? or 3 in about the norm for cold side?

i plan to do a shorty style on driver with cross over to the pass with a log to the turbo..
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41 AM.