Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Why #7?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-09-2012, 08:57 PM
  #121  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
KILLER-LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gectek
Maybe you should read the thread again and once more before you go correcting this person as he has already been shown this multiple times. Does your ASE cert mean that you are able to not read the entire thread, skip to the end, and post the obvious and already rehashed problem?
sorry I corrected your buddy over there

but yes, I did read the thread. Thanks for asking.
Old 04-09-2012, 08:59 PM
  #122  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
gectek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you read the thread, you would know he is not my buddy. You are just upset because I made a remark about you toting your ASE Cert. Alot of people can take tests well. Thats all the ASE is. I know, I am a master tech too, but I do not flaunt it to give my posts validity like others do.
Old 04-10-2012, 11:31 AM
  #123  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
LS14EVR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Fenton, MI
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gectek
Exhaust happens in pulses, a clothes dryer does not pulse the air....unless you drive a Cube, in which case it looks like a Maytag anyway.
Old 04-10-2012, 02:52 PM
  #124  
Teching In
 
Syclone538's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 427
The intake on the LS1 or LS6 when reversed (installed like the front wheel drive) still burns up #7 first. The intake can be flipped with 10 02 sensors and the afr on each cylinder/bank does not change within the error of the sensor.

Kurt
That would pretty much eliminate the intake manifold.

If you can change the fuel supply to the rails that pretty much eliminates #7 injector having the least pressure or collecting any dirt causing the problem.

I don't know exactly how water flows through the engine, but if you can block the ports on the back and only use the ports on the front (LS6), I wonder if it would be better to block the ports in the front and only use the ports in the back, since they are farther from the water pump?
Old 04-10-2012, 04:25 PM
  #125  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
Ryans99ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OH & MI
Posts: 1,507
Received 118 Likes on 57 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Syclone538
That would pretty much eliminate the intake manifold.

If you can change the fuel supply to the rails that pretty much eliminates #7 injector having the least pressure or collecting any dirt causing the problem.

I don't know exactly how water flows through the engine, but if you can block the ports on the back and only use the ports on the front (LS6), I wonder if it would be better to block the ports in the front and only use the ports in the back, since they are farther from the water pump?
Hmm thats an interesting thought. youd be forcing all the coolant to exit through the rears where there already seems to be a deficiency. just gotta wonder if youd be moving the problem to the front of the motor now. I bet the only way to see would be to try..and i dont think many people will volunteer haha.
Old 04-10-2012, 09:29 PM
  #126  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Zmg00camaross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 5,049
Received 47 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

Just vent them.
Old 04-10-2012, 11:05 PM
  #127  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (39)
 
LilJayV10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Evansville,IN
Posts: 9,442
Received 897 Likes on 639 Posts

Default

Old 04-10-2012, 11:25 PM
  #128  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
FlashLCD33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It is not the intake manifold. As Kurt stated, and a couple guys with bewsted LS4 cars that are still blowing up number 7 (yes, the actual 7, idiot). It's not because it's a front fed manifold. I saw an EGT comparison from some of the fast guys that blew that idea out of the water, and showed how bad some carb style intakes distribute air based on EGTs between cylinders. The fuel arrangement doesn't seem to matter either.

It basically has to be cooling related. The steam ports are a big help. GM didn't put them on some engines... but they also didn't put a turbo and an extra 500+hp. Putting your highest flowing injector on #7 is a good idea, and more cooling. I'm not a fan of colder thermostats, but maybe a little bit would help. Oil likes to be around 180 degrees, and I think people running around with 160 t-stats never get it there. A safe tune is a 100% must, and meth injection will help keep cylinder temps down.

There is no 100% fix-all, but a good combination of everything will sure help. Afterall, people are making 1000+hp on stock truck motors... these things can't live forever, and people should have no room to complain when one does pop.
Old 04-10-2012, 11:32 PM
  #129  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
gectek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

PS just because a t stat says 160, doesnt mean the coolant stays at 160. They normally regulate the temp to about 170-180. And the vettes have an oil temp sensor so you can log that also. The oil absorbs the heat from the combustion chamber. If your t stat says 160 it doesnt mean your engine and its oil get no hotter than that. It is just that it tries to regulate the engine at a lower temp.
Old 04-11-2012, 08:43 AM
  #130  
On The Tree
 
miatainthe10s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Dela-Where?
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If its cooling, I know most of you guys are running regular water pumps. What about remote mount electric water pump reversed cooling. Shove the cool water in the heads and the steam ports? Just a thought.
Old 04-11-2012, 10:36 AM
  #131  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
gectek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Elec water pumps are kind of a touchy subject around here. If you were looking at higher flow reg water pumps, you usually had to go with some expensive units. Now there is the Edelbrock, Meziere makes one, and now Nasty Performance offers some as well. They do flow more water, but its not the amount of water that is flowing through the block, but the distribution of said water and the ability to get all the air pockets out of it that is in question.
Old 04-11-2012, 11:03 AM
  #132  
On The Tree
 
miatainthe10s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Dela-Where?
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I agree, wasn't refering to flow more so direction.
Old 04-11-2012, 11:44 AM
  #133  
Teching In
 
Syclone538's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by miatainthe10s
If its cooling, I know most of you guys are running regular water pumps. What about remote mount electric water pump reversed cooling. Shove the cool water in the heads and the steam ports? Just a thought.
Pushing water into the steam ports is another interesting idea, with, or without reverse flow.

I'm new to LS engines. I knew that the LT1 was reverse flow, and I guess just from the location of the thermostat I had always assumed the LS engines were reverse flow too. Heads cooler and bore hotter seemed like a good idea to me, though I can see how it would make it harder to get all the air out. From what I have found it seem the reason for not using reverse flow was legal, not technical.
Old 04-11-2012, 12:14 PM
  #134  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (28)
 
BadgeZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Take a look at all the work done over the years to solve rear cylinder cooling problems in the first generation 400's. Front intake water passages are plumbed to pump water to the rear manifold water ports. Some have run off the water pump into the side of the block to try and get cooler water to the rear. The two motors are different designs but the ideas might be worth investigating. I also think the thin cylinder walls on the LS1 motors is a problem but won't got there here.
Old 04-11-2012, 12:36 PM
  #135  
On The Tree
 
miatainthe10s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Dela-Where?
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BadgeZ28
Take a look at all the work done over the years to solve rear cylinder cooling problems in the first generation 400's. Front intake water passages are plumbed to pump water to the rear manifold water ports. Some have run off the water pump into the side of the block to try and get cooler water to the rear. The two motors are different designs but the ideas might be worth investigating. I also think the thin cylinder walls on the LS1 motors is a problem but won't got there here.
If that were so wouldn't we see coolant temp rise like the 400 did. I dunno.
Old 04-11-2012, 01:12 PM
  #136  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (28)
 
BadgeZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by miatainthe10s
If that were so wouldn't we see coolant temp rise like the 400 did. I dunno.
Good point. We are battling broad overheating with the first gen 400. I guess I am wondering if more that the vent tube mod would help.
Old 04-11-2012, 01:39 PM
  #137  
On The Tree
 
miatainthe10s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Dela-Where?
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would like to see some of the big boy chime in. Like someone who builds these things day in day out. Maybe va speed or Texas.It seems funny that they haven't yet. Or there just laughing cause it just in the tune.

Last edited by miatainthe10s; 04-11-2012 at 01:45 PM.
Old 04-11-2012, 02:29 PM
  #138  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Nasty N8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lake in the Hills, IL
Posts: 5,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The Evans cooling pumps are designed and modified for this specific issue. The housing is machined to more evenly cool all cyl.

EVANS COOLING SYSTEMS, INC. high flow coolant pump and pulley combination for the hot-running GM LS1/LS6 engines. The new LS1 Coolant pump and pulley combination, part number EP3913, is designed to not only flow more volume but to offer sufficient cooling to the lone number 7 and 8. Flowing over 20 percent more than the OEM style replacement pumps, the EP3913 maintains equal flow to both cylinder banks at any engine RPM. OEM style pumps do not. Evans has improved the design of the OEM casting to include a Billet pulley hub, heavy-duty 3/4″ roller bearing, and ceramic shaft seal. The EP3913 also includes the Evans 3.8″ OD 8 vane scrolled impeller to reduce parasitic horsepower loss at high RPM.

We have tested against a few popular Electric pumps and it more than doubles the flow at higher RPM. Electric pumps are like running a factory pump at just over 2000rpm all the time. The Evans pump increases flow across the entire RPM range.

https://www.nastyperformance.com/sho...ow-water-pump/
Old 04-11-2012, 04:14 PM
  #139  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Now if only the evans pump had a pulley hub on it like the ls2 does so I could use it with the Procharger.
Old 04-11-2012, 07:00 PM
  #140  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (6)
 
AES Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Elk Grove Village IL
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Interesting concept, until I see a infrared thermograph showing evidence, i'll give it a second thought.


Quick Reply: Why #7?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02 PM.