speed density vs maf tune
I'd say if your AFR is where it should be and the car drives good, keep it MAF. In the end, MAF will compensate for temp changes, speed density won't.
On a 4th gen it's very easy to max out the stock MAF sensor which means any additional boost/airflow and your PCM commands no more additional fuel.
Tune something SD however and you can run 0-30lbs of boost, change it on the fly and fueling remains perfect at every boost level. Yes, and even if the temperature changes.
Trending Topics
On a 4th gen it's very easy to max out the stock MAF sensor which means any additional boost/airflow and your PCM commands no more additional fuel.
Tune something SD however and you can run 0-30lbs of boost, change it on the fly and fueling remains perfect at every boost level. Yes, and even if the temperature changes.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
On a 4th gen it's very easy to max out the stock MAF sensor which means any additional boost/airflow and your PCM commands no more additional fuel.
Tune something SD however and you can run 0-30lbs of boost, change it on the fly and fueling remains perfect at every boost level. Yes, and even if the temperature changes.
Both work well, I'm not denying that, but I personally have always liked MAF tunes over speed density.
Now where does having a MAF help you in any way? Severe elevation changes can be one place where a MAF (assuming it can handle the flow you're throwing at it) can help you have a nice tight tune. The MAF also helps with understanding the change in flow based on humidity also. But I know plenty of Road Race guys using speed densitiy tunes and the difference in tune is negligible according to them from full rain to desert dry.
I've only heard of Harlan running a MAF that can handle big power (1000RWHP) but he had his own GM custom code in there since he worked for GM with some custom MAF's.









