F1X cam I did
i say let it go Martin and keep doing your thing, your doing a great ****** job!!!
Kurt
Last edited by Cam72aro; Oct 26, 2012 at 09:00 PM.
This wasn't something I said to myself, hey....I'm going to make myself look good.... or Aaron, let's mess with these guys and make us both look good.
I still cannot think why Aaron, who doesn't know me from Adam, would tell you guys that this is all that was changed, if it wasn't the case? What does he have to gain from it?
Sub-par expectations yield sub-par results.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
As an example, here was a test I did. Still not perfectly controlled but the best I could do on a chassis dyno.
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-z...dyno-test.html

I agree with others that the first cam really doesn't seem off or out of the ordinary to me, especially to say that it would lose 125rwhp over what you have in there currently.
Not trying to bust your ***** or say anything negative about the cam you chose but honestly, dyno pulls chopped off short and trailing off lean aren't providing enough information to validate gains.
JMHO
There is no way any amount of timing, AFR change or anything tuning related could alter the gains this much.
This wasn't a deal where we even thought it would pick up this much. I honestly thought 50rwhp would be the most it could gain, maybe 75rwhp and it did what it did. I never planned on running any scientific tests or anything to appease the vendors on LS1tech and control every variable. I have a happy customer who loves the work I did for him and it seems that the other vendors are hating every minute of it. A happy customer rubs off on other potential customers and sways them away from their business and of possibly making profit. The only way to stop that is to discredit the guy who designed the cam in question.
I know I will be told I'm wrong, and I don't know my *** from a hole in the ground, but I'm not the only one who is seeing it that way right now. All this talk of trying to discredit the results is only making those who are doing the discrediting look even worse, not me.
Last edited by Sales@Tick; Oct 27, 2012 at 05:21 AM.
More than you do.
If you truly have tuned a 1000+ hp car, you'll know exactly what happens when timing or airfuel does when put on the limit, and you won't make claims like "no amount of timing or air fuel could make that difference".....
You may have good customer service, but you lack real world experience. It's nothing
Personal, it's just business.
There you go, trying to dodge bullets and divert attention.
That was 2001 broham. I'm
Pretty sure you were 13 at the time. And his were 34, mine were 32" with a weld on Collector, not slip on.
Remember when I asked you if you had tuned a 1000 + hp car? Oh wait. You never have. par for the course I Suppose. You should go back to yellow bullet and learn more.
You just spec'ed a bunch of blower and turbo cams but you did ZERO in house or dyno validation. You have no clue what they do. But you're the expert.
While swapping out the cam, something else was undeliberately fixed and caused the big jump in power, otherwise maybe 20hp would be from the cam, and not 105rwhp.





