Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

58 tooth or 24 tooth reluctor wheel?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-17-2015, 01:00 PM
  #1  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (82)
 
Ratical's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Rotterdam, New York
Posts: 998
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts

Default 58 tooth or 24 tooth reluctor wheel?

I'm getting ready to purchase a forged crank for my boosted 6.0 build and I was curious if there is any benefit to running a 58 tooth reluctor wheel instead of the 24 tooth? I have a Holley Dominator EFI system, so I can run either one.
Old 01-17-2015, 01:38 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
 
2muchboostNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

From my understanding the 58x provides better resolution and cleaner signal with less noise. I am sure those with running knowledge will have better insight.
Old 01-17-2015, 02:28 PM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
LLLosingit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Iowa
Posts: 3,837
Received 474 Likes on 354 Posts

Default

I found this in a search

Originally Posted by Jason Haines @ LPE
The 58x actually has less position information for the ECM compared to the 24x wheel. The 24x wheel is actually two wheels with two different patterns. To make up for the lost position information on the crankshaft reluctor wheel GM added additional position information to the camshaft reluctor wheel.

The two will make the same power. More aftermarket engine management systems can understand the 58x crank wheel (60 tooth less two teeth) but several aftermarket systems can understand the 24x wheel now.

If you want to be able to go to mechanical throttle using OEM electronics then you want the 24x reluctor wheel. None of the GM ECM's support mechanical throttle and 58x. On the other hand you can do electronic throttle or mechanical throttle with the 24x reluctor wheel.

If you want to control an electronic transmission you can get a single module (a Powertrain Control Module, PCM) to control the engine and transmission. With the 58x crank you will need an ECM and a TCM.

On the other hand if you want to run the newer 6spd automatic transmission (6L80 or 6L90) then you will want a 58x crank because the T43 TCM that controls those transmissions is normally combined with a E38 or an E67 ECM (both 58x ECM's).

Lots of other small plusses and minuses exist for each but in the end you can make either one work in most custom applications.

Hopefully some of that information is useful and I haven't made this more confusing.
Old 01-17-2015, 05:25 PM
  #4  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (82)
 
Ratical's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Rotterdam, New York
Posts: 998
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Hmmmm... from that write up it almost seems like the 24 tooth is the better choice for my combination. I would think more is better but...... ??? I'm most concerned with controlling spark and such under boost. I would hate to get a scattered signal on a pass and hurt something.
Old 01-17-2015, 05:47 PM
  #5  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 179 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

I would never willingly choose the 24x. It is just **** from the word go.
Old 01-17-2015, 08:43 PM
  #6  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
soundengineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 4,651
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

There's nothing wrong with either of them..

The 58 has the benefit of a 4x cam sensor to go with it.. which equates to a faster start..in as short as 1/4 revolution instead of a full revolution with the 1x cam sensor and the 24x crank.

I have a 24x crank in my engine.. because I had an ecu that had a 24x operating system.. now I have a Holley EFI system... and it no longer matters which one I use..


Both of them work equallly as good..
My car starts instantly.... and I spin it 8000 rpm on a regular basis with zero issues....with a 24x reluctor and a 1x cam sensor...
Old 01-17-2015, 09:03 PM
  #7  
TECH Resident
 
Bad Apache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
Posts: 977
Received 117 Likes on 98 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
I would never willingly choose the 24x. It is just **** from the word go.
Can you elaborate as to why?
Old 01-18-2015, 04:53 AM
  #8  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 179 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Bad Apache
Can you elaborate as to why?
It's a **** design. it comes apart, it's more prone to wobble with it's two piece design, it's more prone to issues with crank end float because of the narrow two track design, so a little endfloat stands more chance of erratic signal
Old 01-18-2015, 08:10 AM
  #9  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
rotary1307cc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,790
Likes: 0
Received 120 Likes on 89 Posts

Default

That can be fixed

The CBM billet piece is maybe even overdone


Old 01-18-2015, 08:25 AM
  #10  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 179 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

It was fixed....with a 60-2 lol.

Why manufacturers try and dream up stupid wheels is daft when there are existing setups out there that are 100% tried and tested over 20+ years
Old 01-18-2015, 08:49 AM
  #11  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
soundengineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 4,651
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by stevieturbo
It's a **** design. it comes apart, it's more prone to wobble with it's two piece design, it's more prone to issues with crank end float because of the narrow two track design, so a little endfloat stands more chance of erratic signal
and yet many many thousands of them exist with zero issues.....

the failures of a few does not equate to a common problem

plenty of people going fast with a 24x reluctor.
Old 01-18-2015, 09:07 AM
  #12  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
samdogmx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Alton, IL
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

24X on mine with no problems
Old 01-18-2015, 09:07 AM
  #13  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 179 Likes on 154 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by soundengineer
and yet many many thousands of them exist with zero issues.....

the failures of a few does not equate to a common problem

plenty of people going fast with a 24x reluctor.
And many engines with carburettors and distributors exist with zero issues, and they can go fast too.

But that's hardly a good argument for going back to them.

That still doesnt mean it's a good system when you know there are better options.
Old 02-12-2019, 02:02 PM
  #14  
Teching In
 
Jmaitland806's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the stock 24x? im building a forged 370 with pt88 as well going to use stock crank if possible. did you buy billet or run stock?



Quick Reply: 58 tooth or 24 tooth reluctor wheel?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:14 PM.