05 colorado SBE 6.0/C480/4l80e 9.78@143 foot brake 3850lbs
#1522
9 Second Club
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
That hard nylon stuff is very common here in the UK.
Must admit, it has always concerned me for such usage, as with the picture above they also use it for fuel.
Great in theory, very easy routed, very cheap....in terms of robustness against damage ? Bound to be ****. And against contact with anything hot ? also bound to be ****.
But thousands use it and dont seem to have problems.
Must admit, it has always concerned me for such usage, as with the picture above they also use it for fuel.
Great in theory, very easy routed, very cheap....in terms of robustness against damage ? Bound to be ****. And against contact with anything hot ? also bound to be ****.
But thousands use it and dont seem to have problems.
#1523
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
That hard nylon stuff is very common here in the UK.
Must admit, it has always concerned me for such usage, as with the picture above they also use it for fuel.
Great in theory, very easy routed, very cheap....in terms of robustness against damage ? Bound to be ****. And against contact with anything hot ? also bound to be ****.
But thousands use it and dont seem to have problems.
Must admit, it has always concerned me for such usage, as with the picture above they also use it for fuel.
Great in theory, very easy routed, very cheap....in terms of robustness against damage ? Bound to be ****. And against contact with anything hot ? also bound to be ****.
But thousands use it and dont seem to have problems.
#1525
9 Second Club
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Either way, still very thin nylon...unprotected hose.
Despite it, I dont think I've ever seen a car here have issue with it. It wouldnt be my first choice though, but it would be hard to beat the cost and convenience of it.
#1526
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
from what i have read, heard and used, (i had a busa with a dry kit, shower head and nylon tubing)
splitting it into a shower head knocks the pressure down per port, say 1000psi over 4 cylinders is 250psi per hole and its rated for like 300-350psi so its well within range at least that is the way it was explained to me...
never had issues setup that way.
never ran a feed with 1050psi over nylon either
splitting it into a shower head knocks the pressure down per port, say 1000psi over 4 cylinders is 250psi per hole and its rated for like 300-350psi so its well within range at least that is the way it was explained to me...
never had issues setup that way.
never ran a feed with 1050psi over nylon either
#1527
9 Second Club
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
from what i have read, heard and used, (i had a busa with a dry kit, shower head and nylon tubing)
splitting it into a shower head knocks the pressure down per port, say 1000psi over 4 cylinders is 250psi per hole and its rated for like 300-350psi so its well within range at least that is the way it was explained to me...
never had issues setup that way.
never ran a feed with 1050psi over nylon either
splitting it into a shower head knocks the pressure down per port, say 1000psi over 4 cylinders is 250psi per hole and its rated for like 300-350psi so its well within range at least that is the way it was explained to me...
never had issues setup that way.
never ran a feed with 1050psi over nylon either
Unless the shower head heavily restricts flow, there is no reason pressure should change in the system. And if it heavily restricted flow...it probably isnt a good design to start with, as the final jet should always be controlling flow.
#1528
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Chug! Chug! Chug!](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_chug.gif)