Smallest twin for 5.7 ls1 swap
06-26-2019, 07:46 AM
#82
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
Might actually turn out cheaper than doing the labor himself. Funny part is I know nothing, yet my SBE D1SC at 7 psi went faster than his fox with an entire Cobra motor/blower swap.....and my 3800lb 383 turbo daily driver getting 30 mpg's went faster and quicker at 8 psi than the almighty "bolt-in" 3200 lb faceplated disaster on the 4th motor. Its sad since said disaster "cut a 1.2 sixty foot" on the hero pass and still was slower.
Yea dude....your h/c boosted junk beat my bolt on stuff by less than .1 great job
. And that was your fast one.....the other one got it's *** whooped. So it took you 2 cars two boosted cars to be my bolt on one. You'reother h/c boosted car i thrashed. Do you really think that a accomplishment for a h/c bolt on boosted hotrod?Worst part is with your turd weighing 3800lb it shows what a idiot you are to add 300-400 lb of weight to a performance car. My old bolt on junk would have railed you in every other performance aspect. Your pile could only compete in a straight line. It is very clear you don't know nothing fo sho.
My termi fox went 11.2@125.98. Pretty good for basic stuff on 12yr old dr. No headers, stock ported blower. Pullied on 14 psi. Stock cams......can you say you ever went in the 11s on stock cam? I can.....in 3 different cars and 10s with one.
How does your built ls6 run?? Lmao
Last edited by HioSSilver; 06-26-2019 at 07:52 AM.
06-26-2019, 07:55 AM
#83
Restricted User
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
waiting for this simple, cost affordable recipe for 550whp N/A.
AND STTTTTTTTTTIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILLLLLLLLLLL LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL WAITING.
06-26-2019, 10:54 AM
#84
This thread is hilarious... so far I got a $5k+ NA build can't make 550whp, a $1000 garage built turbo setup can make 600+whp, no examples of any 550+LS1's have been provided, and an open callout is being ignored. Am I all caught up?
FACT: A clapped out 5.3L and a chinese turbo outperforms every NA setup on this forum. yap your gums all you want ain't one of those fancy *** NA setups run 7's or even 8's, heck most 427+CI NA builds are hard pressed to run 9's NA. Meanwhile its almost to the point if you don't run at least 8's with a junkyard 5.3 turbo setup you're doing it wrong. I'll wait for all the NA excuses... 5.3 revs to 7500+ SBE-check, Gen4 internals handle 1000hp-check, rate of acceleration is faster with the turbo period as the NA car is down 20+MPH, if for some reason NA is out front you can just turn up the boost from the drivers seat and win, next excuse... I'll wait!
FACT: A clapped out 5.3L and a chinese turbo outperforms every NA setup on this forum. yap your gums all you want ain't one of those fancy *** NA setups run 7's or even 8's, heck most 427+CI NA builds are hard pressed to run 9's NA. Meanwhile its almost to the point if you don't run at least 8's with a junkyard 5.3 turbo setup you're doing it wrong. I'll wait for all the NA excuses... 5.3 revs to 7500+ SBE-check, Gen4 internals handle 1000hp-check, rate of acceleration is faster with the turbo period as the NA car is down 20+MPH, if for some reason NA is out front you can just turn up the boost from the drivers seat and win, next excuse... I'll wait!
The following users liked this post:
panda240ss (06-27-2019)
06-26-2019, 11:13 AM
#85
Restricted User
The first sub-$1000 twin setup I did. Almost exactly as the one I described in my previous post using stock truck manifolds, transition flanges, and all 2.5" piping.
This was the first outing once the setup was sorted.
A little over 3600 lbs with driver, T56, ran a 10.69 a few weeks later through a full exhaust with mufflers. Had 10.20s in it with a few turns of the boost controller and no other changes.
Never went any faster because the LT1 T56 took a dump and it couldn't be flat shifted from the start.
$800 TOTAL on the turbo setup. Turbos, gates, piping, intercooler, couplers, oil lines.
06-26-2019, 11:37 AM
#86
This thread is hilarious... so far I got a $5k+ NA build can't make 550whp, a $1000 garage built turbo setup can make 600+whp, no examples of any 550+LS1's have been provided, and an open callout is being ignored. Am I all caught up?
FACT: A clapped out 5.3L and a chinese turbo outperforms every NA setup on this forum. yap your gums all you want ain't one of those fancy *** NA setups run 7's or even 8's, heck most 427+CI NA builds are hard pressed to run 9's NA. Meanwhile its almost to the point if you don't run at least 8's with a junkyard 5.3 turbo setup you're doing it wrong. I'll wait for all the NA excuses... 5.3 revs to 7500+ SBE-check, Gen4 internals handle 1000hp-check, rate of acceleration is faster with the turbo period as the NA car is down 20+MPH, if for some reason NA is out front you can just turn up the boost from the drivers seat and win, next excuse... I'll wait!
FACT: A clapped out 5.3L and a chinese turbo outperforms every NA setup on this forum. yap your gums all you want ain't one of those fancy *** NA setups run 7's or even 8's, heck most 427+CI NA builds are hard pressed to run 9's NA. Meanwhile its almost to the point if you don't run at least 8's with a junkyard 5.3 turbo setup you're doing it wrong. I'll wait for all the NA excuses... 5.3 revs to 7500+ SBE-check, Gen4 internals handle 1000hp-check, rate of acceleration is faster with the turbo period as the NA car is down 20+MPH, if for some reason NA is out front you can just turn up the boost from the drivers seat and win, next excuse... I'll wait!
06-26-2019, 12:18 PM
#87
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
So everyone that assembles an engine has their own machine shop?
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
waiting for this simple, cost affordable recipe for 550whp N/A.
AND STTTTTTTTTTIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILLLLLLLLLLL LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL WAITING.
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
waiting for this simple, cost affordable recipe for 550whp N/A.
AND STTTTTTTTTTIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILLLLLLLLLLL LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL WAITING.
It's funny to see that you think a assembler is the same as a builder. A builder has the equipment and does the machine work needed. There is a difference but you're not bright enough to figure that out.
This thread is hilarious... so far I got a $5k+ NA build can't make 550whp, a $1000 garage built turbo setup can make 600+whp, no examples of any 550+LS1's have been provided, and an open callout is being ignored. Am I all caught up?
FACT: A clapped out 5.3L and a chinese turbo outperforms every NA setup on this forum. yap your gums all you want ain't one of those fancy *** NA setups run 7's or even 8's, heck most 427+CI NA builds are hard pressed to run 9's NA. Meanwhile its almost to the point if you don't run at least 8's with a junkyard 5.3 turbo setup you're doing it wrong. I'll wait for all the NA excuses... 5.3 revs to 7500+ SBE-check, Gen4 internals handle 1000hp-check, rate of acceleration is faster with the turbo period as the NA car is down 20+MPH, if for some reason NA is out front you can just turn up the boost from the drivers seat and win, next excuse... I'll wait!
FACT: A clapped out 5.3L and a chinese turbo outperforms every NA setup on this forum. yap your gums all you want ain't one of those fancy *** NA setups run 7's or even 8's, heck most 427+CI NA builds are hard pressed to run 9's NA. Meanwhile its almost to the point if you don't run at least 8's with a junkyard 5.3 turbo setup you're doing it wrong. I'll wait for all the NA excuses... 5.3 revs to 7500+ SBE-check, Gen4 internals handle 1000hp-check, rate of acceleration is faster with the turbo period as the NA car is down 20+MPH, if for some reason NA is out front you can just turn up the boost from the drivers seat and win, next excuse... I'll wait!
https://youtu.be/D5teJMldZqo
The first sub-$1000 twin setup I did. Almost exactly as the one I described in my previous post using stock truck manifolds, transition flanges, and all 2.5" piping.
This was the first outing once the setup was sorted.
A little over 3600 lbs with driver, T56, ran a 10.69 a few weeks later through a full exhaust with mufflers. Had 10.20s in it with a few turns of the boost controller and no other changes.
Never went any faster because the LT1 T56 took a dump and it couldn't be flat shifted from the start.
$800 TOTAL on the turbo setup. Turbos, gates, piping, intercooler, couplers, oil lines.
The first sub-$1000 twin setup I did. Almost exactly as the one I described in my previous post using stock truck manifolds, transition flanges, and all 2.5" piping.
This was the first outing once the setup was sorted.
A little over 3600 lbs with driver, T56, ran a 10.69 a few weeks later through a full exhaust with mufflers. Had 10.20s in it with a few turns of the boost controller and no other changes.
Never went any faster because the LT1 T56 took a dump and it couldn't be flat shifted from the start.
$800 TOTAL on the turbo setup. Turbos, gates, piping, intercooler, couplers, oil lines.
Obviously these boosted vehicles are struggling to get past solid bolt on times. Just be glad i didn't run that little na bolt on ls6 in it's final form.
06-26-2019, 12:18 PM
#88
The first sub-$1000 twin setup I did. Almost exactly as the one I described in my previous post using stock truck manifolds, transition flanges, and all 2.5" piping.
This was the first outing once the setup was sorted.
A little over 3600 lbs with driver, T56, ran a 10.69 a few weeks later through a full exhaust with mufflers. Had 10.20s in it with a few turns of the boost controller and no other changes.
Never went any faster because the LT1 T56 took a dump and it couldn't be flat shifted from the start.
$800 TOTAL on the turbo setup. Turbos, gates, piping, intercooler, couplers, oil lines.
This was the first outing once the setup was sorted.
A little over 3600 lbs with driver, T56, ran a 10.69 a few weeks later through a full exhaust with mufflers. Had 10.20s in it with a few turns of the boost controller and no other changes.
Never went any faster because the LT1 T56 took a dump and it couldn't be flat shifted from the start.
$800 TOTAL on the turbo setup. Turbos, gates, piping, intercooler, couplers, oil lines.
06-26-2019, 12:26 PM
#91
Restricted User
Originally Posted by HioSSilver
I guess the difference between you and i is i can run 10s na with a bolt on engine and it took you twin turbos to do it. Pretty sad on your part. If i went twins i definitely wouldn't be looking at having a 10sec car.
And when is the last time you ran 8's N/A, because I can guarantee that the entire long block/turbo setup in either my Nova or Corvette is still cheaper than a 10 second N/A long block.
Originally Posted by HioSSilver
Obviously these boosted vehicles are struggling to get past solid bolt on times. Just be glad i didn't run that little na bolt on ls6 in it's final form.
Your "I can do that too" attitude is HILARIOUS.
I'M STILL CALLING YOU OUT ON YOUR BS. PAID DYNO TIME, FREE ENGINE IF YOU WIN.
06-26-2019, 12:38 PM
#93
Restricted User
06-26-2019, 12:45 PM
#94
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
I'm just going to keep making fun of you and asking for proof that you can't provide
3600 lb stick shift truck on mild boost. The entire long block/turbo setup cost less than a set of Mamo 220 heads. Even if it only ever ran 10s, it did it way cheaper and easier than your N/A setup.
And when is the last time you ran 8's N/A, because I can guarantee that the entire long block/turbo setup in either my Nova or Corvette is still cheaper than a 10 second N/A long block.
Struggling? No. These are minimum effort setups that perform as well as your maximum effort setups lol. The truck could have easily ran 9.50s on the same boost level if it was a stripped down truck built just for racing.
Your "I can do that too" attitude is HILARIOUS.
I'M STILL CALLING YOU OUT ON YOUR BS. PAID DYNO TIME, FREE ENGINE IF YOU WIN.
3600 lb stick shift truck on mild boost. The entire long block/turbo setup cost less than a set of Mamo 220 heads. Even if it only ever ran 10s, it did it way cheaper and easier than your N/A setup.
And when is the last time you ran 8's N/A, because I can guarantee that the entire long block/turbo setup in either my Nova or Corvette is still cheaper than a 10 second N/A long block.
Struggling? No. These are minimum effort setups that perform as well as your maximum effort setups lol. The truck could have easily ran 9.50s on the same boost level if it was a stripped down truck built just for racing.
Your "I can do that too" attitude is HILARIOUS.
I'M STILL CALLING YOU OUT ON YOUR BS. PAID DYNO TIME, FREE ENGINE IF YOU WIN.
How was my effort maximum? I drove the car to the track on a rain worthy dr on pump gas and ran a 10.7. Max effort with require atleast a slick and a fuel......probably should take the jack and spare out fo maximus efforts to.
Not like i custom built a twin turbo max effortness.
Here's the funny part about you vaginal carriers.......I'm not against boost. Not at all. I only questioned op's motives for. Then yalls menstrual cycle kicked in .
Op has a 2500lb car or less. Unless he's goin for 8s i wouldn't eff with turbos IN HIS CAR. Not YOUR CAR BUT HIS CAR. Can you guys grasp this.......earth to idiots.....come in idiots.
Hell if you look around on tech ive said lots that i wouldn't eff with anything but twins on a ls.
06-26-2019, 01:02 PM
#99
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
What part of me not caring to run 8s don't you understand?
I mean **** it can't be to hard if you did it. No doubt starting with a 10sec bolt on na car would make it alot easier even.....think about it.