I got an extra $500 for the pot if the N/A 346 makes more power than the @JoeNova boosted motor. That would pay for AT LEAST the TB right?

 

I don't have a c6z and yes 130 is fast. Especially for a true dd like mine was. Bolt on c6z has been 138....i personally think 140 is attainable with bolt ons in those cars/engines. If my ls7 wouldn't have had start up issue then we likely woulda seen that.



I don't think i said it would make as much power as a boosted motor......but it could be as fast just like my na junk was as fast as your boosted pile.

 

130mph is considered fast???

I guess I never got that memo. lol

PS. Hiollary ain't bright even considering that she is 88% inbred....cut her a bit of slack k?

 

I guess it's fast for slow people? I thought it was decent for like a week 10 years ago and moved on.

 

I would say 99% of people wouldn't agree with either of you on that.

And zoolander is just a straight up active menstrual cycle.

 

I'll take you up on that. Double or nothing for the whole car, and I'll have less invested in the entire car than you do the engine.
Don't bitch out again.

 

Loving these call outs! Seems reasonable to me if you truly believe your car will be quicker.

 

Hiollary will ignore and deflect any call out, seen this pattern for years from her.

PS. She won't even do a $20 bet to back her mouth up.....let alone anything substantial. LOL

 

Throw my 500 on top. Should be easy money for the "bolt in" glory. In for more excuses though....last time I checked run what you brung. Who cares if you have Bolton's/Bolt-ins, cam only, h/c/i/e, big cubes, boost, N2O....RUN IT. Let's not forget these Bolton setups are BOTH with ENGINE swaps. Not everyone wants to work harder just to under perform

 

True, the average person thinks craptastic hybrids are fast but anyone with a real car knows what fast is. To me it isn’t fast if it doesn't have the potential to scare me, so to me personally under 150 is like slow motion. It helps I drive all sorts of cars and get pretty used to what most people consider “fast”. Most people with turbo cars dont consider 130 fast, but I’ve had some people with cammed or blower bolton cars think 130 is greatest thing since sliced bread. Just depends, but to me driving a 130mph car is like driving my truck, not adventurous at all.

lolzz, so true! After an engine swap it all goes out the window.

 

Just to add some fuel to the fire...

My N/A c6 z06 made 646whp on motor. 830whp on a 150hp dry shot. It trapped 142.5mph on motor and 150mph on spray. Sold all of that and threw in a SBE 5.3 and a single turbo that's now making 890whp on 18psi. It's much faster than the motor setup ever was (obviously) and faster than the nitrous setup was. The torque curve of the turbo setup comes on like a healthy shot of nitrous. Makes the same TQ, too.

 

True story from someone who has a clue.

 

You're the bitch dude. To weak to even acknowledge there are other ways of building stuff. And it's not like you're **** is that great. I mean who turbos a ls fo 10s......i tell people all the time boost is not needed for 10s. Unless it's you and dbuttsniper.

I seen who don't back there mouth up when it comes to you.

So if i bring a top fuel car it's all good eeh. Or will you guys change the narrative again. Seems to be the common theory here.

I need a update on how many of these 2hr turbo kits have been built since yesterday.

Mines not a swap. A ls belongs in it.

130mph car is fast. To say it's not is asinine. Especially that kinda of acceleration in a car that handles well can give one hell of a thrill.

I think it would mostly come down to how the power of those 2 vehicles was controlled.

Well what was wrong with your clue when your h/c boosted junk was neck and neck with my bolt on na engine?

And that was your good. Your other one wouldn't even have bern a good run. None of your na stuff was a good run either.

 

1. Keeps dodging callouts that are massively in his favor.
2. Can't produce a single 550whp N/A 5.7 build.
3. Doesn't seem to understand that the reason why people do turbo setups for 10s is because they are easier, cheaper, quieter, nicer to drive, more fuel efficient than a 10 second N/A setup, and can do it on pump gas with the A/C on.
4. Trashes someone's boosted setup even though it beat him (we don't care by how much, you lost, and you wouldn't give him the benefit of the doubt if it was the other way around).

Now you're just trash talking everyone because not an single person will side with you and your feeling are hurt. You won't man up to your word and take my call-out. Nothing productive is going to come from talking to you. You'll always be 2 steps behind.

I'm done.

 

1. Fails to realizeI ran 10s na

2. Done told you like 30 times darth made 540 and I'm shooting for 550. Just gotta wait till it's done

3. I ran 10s on pump gas na with a bolt on ls6 with ac

4. You really have no clue what a ls is capable of if you think 10s with twins is good at all. I'm sure slow sedan will agree with me. Maybe that's all what one if those 2hr turbo builds get you.

5. Goes around trying call out people with a engine not even together lookin like a idiot

No nothing productive is coming from you at all. You actually think a twin turbo 10sec ls is good. It's laughable is what it is. 550 whp from a tt 5.7 is awful.....which really has been my argument from the beginning and isn't worth the effort.

 

Hiollary should post up all of her 10 second slips for the class....

 

We are talking about ease, Hio. Your 10.97 run was after engine swaps, faceplated trans, and weight reduction to the point of removing airbags, removing hood hinges, and literally sawing ounces of weight at a time from various brackets, panels, and brake components.

Nova is talking about effort and money required to hit a target, no matter how many times you try to change the direction of the conversation.

 

Somehow I missed this. The only goal should be not to blow up ANOTHER N/A motor. Usually you have to go boosted or N2O to start blowing stuff up. Apparently just more work to perform less still, business as usual.

 

Nova is building turbo kits in 2hrs. I would expect his poor performance.

Yea man i did weight reduction. Hotrodding 101 right theeeeerrrr. I bet you go around calling out erryone for deleting their rear seats because of that evil wr. I have a fully functional car.......2 of them that mops your max effort h/c car.

The car ran 10.76 to....eat it. Wait till slow sedan looks at you and laughs after knowing your pile gets walked by 12 .2 @ 114 cars
Again....because you are a liar. I bent 3 valves in one motor testing a ignition cut.

Why lie about anything? Is it because your own results was so poor

 

Literally every single one of them has made more than 550 wheel and ran 10s or better. Even my 4.8 on just wastegate pressure through a TH400 made more than 550.

It doesn't matter if you make 700whp N/A. Its always going to be quicker, easier, cheaper to make the same amount of power with boost.