Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

the colorado budget repower

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-02-2017, 06:23 AM
  #81  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (7)
 
forcd ind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: woodbine, md
Posts: 4,132
Received 240 Likes on 167 Posts

Default

Matt, what track-if Cecil I might come up and spectate
Old 12-12-2017, 03:08 PM
  #82  
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
denmah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,339
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

tested out some CNC ported heads to see what they would do to this build


dyno test

soon to do TBSS intake swap test
Old 12-12-2017, 08:24 PM
  #83  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (25)
 
truckdoug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Portlandia
Posts: 6,331
Received 526 Likes on 356 Posts

Default

would love to see what a bigger cam would do on that same test.
Old 12-12-2017, 09:24 PM
  #84  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,966
Received 731 Likes on 536 Posts

Default

I'd really like to see what it does with some decent RPM. 7k should be diddly on a 4.8...
Old 12-13-2017, 06:21 AM
  #85  
On The Tree
 
94heritage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

First off I just want to say thanks for taking the time to show everyone all of the different tests you do. My question is were the tests all ran with stock size valves or were they oversized? I never heard either way in the videos what they were.
Old 12-13-2017, 07:52 AM
  #86  
TECH Enthusiast
 
douglee25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 566
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Good info man. I too was surprised you only picked up 20 hp up top.

Doug
Old 12-13-2017, 10:29 AM
  #87  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
BudRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 3,544
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

It didn't seem to increase much more than it would have on an NA motor. I was expecting it to have some compounding results.
Old 12-13-2017, 10:38 AM
  #88  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
408GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: GA
Posts: 966
Received 19 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

I read awhile back on "the nerd" build where he picked up about 25 whp from ported heads also:

https://www.theturboforums.com/threa...5#post-1994822
Old 12-13-2017, 09:09 PM
  #89  
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
denmah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,339
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
I'd really like to see what it does with some decent RPM. 7k should be diddly on a 4.8...
it quits in the low 6s

Originally Posted by 94heritage
First off I just want to say thanks for taking the time to show everyone all of the different tests you do. My question is were the tests all ran with stock size valves or were they oversized? I never heard either way in the videos what they were.
all stock valves

Originally Posted by 408GT
I read awhile back on "the nerd" build where he picked up about 25 whp from ported heads also:

https://www.theturboforums.com/threa...5#post-1994822
well then it appears i am seeing the same thing
Old 12-14-2017, 06:05 AM
  #90  
On The Tree
 
94heritage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I wonder if the valves are causing a restriction and thats why there isnt a bigger gain up top. The 40 hp down low would definitely be a good seat of the pants gain now if it could just carry it all the way to red line. Congrats on the little one and thanks again for all that you do for the community
Old 12-14-2017, 07:42 AM
  #91  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,966
Received 731 Likes on 536 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by denmah
it quits in the low 6s

Why would a “sloppy stage 2 cam” run out of steam in the low 6’s on a 4.8? Does that seem right to you? Factory ECU doing something funky? Spark blow out maybe?
Old 12-14-2017, 07:58 AM
  #92  
Restricted User
 
JoeNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,194
Received 107 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Forcefed86
Why would a “sloppy stage 2 cam” run out of steam in the low 6’s on a 4.8? Does that seem right to you? Factory ECU doing something funky? Spark blow out maybe?
Looks like a classic example of positive cam overlap and turbocharged high exhaust backpressure.
Old 12-14-2017, 08:22 AM
  #93  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,966
Received 731 Likes on 536 Posts

Default

I get the “give a damn” factor isn’t very high on this build, but something sure seems off… Probably why the power didn’t carry through the whole rev range with the ported heads too.

The gains with porting alone on the factory valves (looked like the factor valve job too?) are pretty darn good!
Old 12-14-2017, 09:09 AM
  #94  
Restricted User
 
JoeNova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,194
Received 107 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

Seeing as how he switched heads and valve springs and the curve didn't change much, I would say the only chance it has of being a valvetrain issue is incorrect length pushrod length.

What are the volts showing at 15 PSI? Is it dropping below 12 volts?

My money is still on the cam/turbo combo. I've seen it dozens of times.
Old 12-14-2017, 01:32 PM
  #95  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
3 window's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,051
Received 186 Likes on 136 Posts
Default

Any flow numbers on the heads? Just because the heads are ported doesn’t mean anything. They could flow like ****. I recall more than once a buddy flowing heads someone else ported to find the flow the same as an unported or even less in the crucial areas.
Old 12-14-2017, 01:56 PM
  #96  
TECH Junkie
 
Game ova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 3,013
Received 47 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

[QUOTE][it quits in the low 6s/QUOTE] This shows that you don't have to rev a motor to the moon, to run fast. Seems everyone is all about turning 8500 rpm.
Old 12-14-2017, 02:15 PM
  #97  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
Forcefed86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 7,966
Received 731 Likes on 536 Posts

Default

Not trying to dump on the build. I’m sure Matt could care less if the thing pulls to 7k. But… a typical mild cam NA 4.8 usually peaks around 7k+. It’s the nature of the smaller stroke engine. If it’s falling off at 6k there’s something wrong, regardless of the power it makes before then. Would be cool to find out what the issue is and see what the 4.8 is really capable of is all I’m saying.

I have tons of RPM related issues too, one of the reasons I was asking. Some of my stuff falls flat around 6500 no matter what I do. I’m talking 6-7 motors with all different turbo setups, ECM, Cams etc…
Old 12-14-2017, 02:31 PM
  #98  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
sbcgenII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fort hood
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 3 window
Any flow numbers on the heads? Just because the heads are ported doesn’t mean anything. They could flow like ****. I recall more than once a buddy flowing heads someone else ported to find the flow the same as an unported or even less in the crucial areas.
It picked up 40hp on low boost. It doesn’t matter what they flow.
Old 12-14-2017, 03:39 PM
  #99  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (7)
 
forcd ind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: woodbine, md
Posts: 4,132
Received 240 Likes on 167 Posts

Default

Is it still on the 4.8-def a bad azz little motor
Old 12-14-2017, 04:07 PM
  #100  
TECH Resident
 
Bad Apache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA
Posts: 977
Received 117 Likes on 98 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by forcd ind
Is it still on the 4.8-def a bad azz little motor
Yes, still on the 4.8l engine.


Quick Reply: the colorado budget repower



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:33 PM.