Ordered a TVS2300 for the GTO
If dropping the cats doesn't unveil the "missing" HP I'll either just enjoy it as it is or demod it back to NA to where it was prior.
One of my other buddy's 5th gen maggie stick car would see a pretty big increase in IATs during a 1/4 mile pass.
But I could see you free up 10+ rwhp from going catless.
How about E85?
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I mean you could always run more timing and see what it pulls on the dyno, but on the street you'd likely try to balance power gains with chances of hurting the engine so you'd have timing scaling down as IATs get up in the mid 100s and higher.
!cats should add back in at least 10rwhp I'm thinking?
If y'all have E85 I'd do that if you can plumb in a flex fuel sensor.
If the cats are a restriction, I'd think better ones or none at all would net more than 10hp. Will have to experiment to see.
E85 would require yet bigger injectors and likely upgrades to the fuel system (return line, bigger line from the tank), doesn't seem worth it for the expense. Besides, there is more in there with gasoline so there is no need yet to invite new variables at this point. E85 would be nice to have it run cooler though if nothing else.
Good chat about KPA: https://forum.hptuners.com/showthrea...aust-too-small
So if changing the cam or running E85 are not options at this point, pretty much changing out the airbox and trying catless are your best options.
I'd be curious if folks have changed from the LS2 intake to a 90 or 105mm FAST and seen increases...
Power wise this might be where it's at especially on a conservative tune which isn't terrible. Obviously adding a cam that's spec'd for the blower would open up a good jump 40-50 rwhp? Running a cam for the blower I don't feel would change the overall street manners of the car. But a cam and flex fuel tune which would require fueling upgrades would do wonders but if it makes you smile as-is that's all that really matters.









