Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

good compression ratio and cam specs to run a turbo on?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-28-2004, 10:06 AM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
WS6VERT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: the 770!
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default good compression ratio and cam specs to run a turbo on?

Hey guys, just wonderin around what compression ratio is the best to run a turbo on? I was thinking maybe 9.1 or possibly 8.1 cr. Also, would this be a good cam to run a turbo on and not bleed off boost? Stealth II 224/220, 0.581/0.581 116 lsa? Any suggestions on the cam specs would be nice, I want to try to keep the cam as stealthy as possible, but still have great hp gains. This is the MTI Stealth 2 cam that I hear is a magnificent cam. Thanks guys.
Old 07-28-2004, 10:18 AM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (48)
 
smokinHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Columbus, ohio
Posts: 7,354
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

it really depends on what type of driving you do. if its going to be a street mostly id do 9:1. if mostly track with some street duty then 8.5:1, if an all out track HP monster then 8:1

that stealth cam sounds like it would work well with a turbo.
Old 07-28-2004, 10:27 AM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
SSnakekiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I agree with smokinHawk on the CR. Just make sure you get it to at least 9.0, because when you want to run more boost in the future, a higher CR like 9.5 will limit that...

Most boosted cars I have seen and most cam companies will recommend 114LSA
Old 07-28-2004, 10:53 AM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (48)
 
smokinHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Columbus, ohio
Posts: 7,354
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

114-116 would be a good lsa depending how high you want to rev it.
Old 07-28-2004, 11:02 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
MECHAM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by smokinHawk
114-116 would be a good lsa depending how high you want to rev it.
for my sake.

114 lsa is a lower reving cam vs a 116 lsa?
Old 07-28-2004, 11:59 AM
  #6  
8 second mod
iTrader: (37)
 
Noyzee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: East Side Performance! mASShole
Posts: 17,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I would say to go 9-1 i wouldnt go less.
and i have a perfect FI cam for you, (for sale)
it is a 234/228 576/571 114lsa. It was ground for my old turbo set up and has about 300 miles on it.
either way id stay 114 or 116 and 9-1 cr jmo
Old 07-28-2004, 01:04 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
WS6VERT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: the 770!
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

thanx guys, my car will be entirely a street car, there is no local track aroundabouts where I live so any sort of race setup wouldnt be practical. I think I'm going to go with the 9-1 cr and the Stealth II cam. Thanks once again.
Old 07-28-2004, 01:52 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (48)
 
smokinHawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Columbus, ohio
Posts: 7,354
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by SC-MECHAM-WS6
for my sake.

114 lsa is a lower reving cam vs a 116 lsa?
on a 114 will make its peak power higher in the rev range then a 116
so the lower the lsa the higher it can rev (makes power at higher rpm)
Old 07-28-2004, 01:55 PM
  #9  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
WS6VERT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: the 770!
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

yes, but wont there be more of a lopey sound to that cam? I'm looking for a very smooth idling cam.
Old 07-28-2004, 02:29 PM
  #10  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,727
Received 1,175 Likes on 764 Posts

Default

I'm sure that 224/220/116 MTI cam would idle very smoothly. Heck I had a 232/232//116 cam that idled almost without tuning like five years ago.
Old 07-28-2004, 05:59 PM
  #11  
Teching In
 
98Zam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Nevada
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by smokinHawk
if an all out track HP monster then 8:1

ok, i understand the lower cr because you can use more boost, but why would you only do 8:1 on a "track only hp monster car" why not a street car/when needed monster HP machine

basicly, im just wondering why you cant have the best of both worlds with a low compression ratio that allows more hp easier with boost increase, and low boost for "driving around". are their daily driving issues involved with the low compression?
Old 07-28-2004, 06:09 PM
  #12  
TECH Resident
 
ChevyNo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The lower the compression the less low-end power you will have until the boost kicks in. So if you don't get serious boost until 3K, then the car will be doggy under that. I still decided to go for 8.7:1, which would work out pretty good.
Old 07-28-2004, 08:06 PM
  #13  
Staging Lane
 
Short Round's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: East Coast Kid
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what kind of fuel will you primarily be running? what kind of duty? (street daily driver, weekend race car, full race car...)
Old 07-28-2004, 08:25 PM
  #14  
TECH Resident
 
V8_DSM_V8again's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Street 9:1 to 9.5:1 depending on boost level and fuel used.

Gas race 7.5-8.5:1

If I was'nt going funky fuel I'd run 7.8:1 or so even on the street... Pre boost power on the V8's I have seen is so much better than a 2.0 fed by a T61 (That has lag.....) I rode in a single turbo V8 with a T76 and was like umm you call THAT lag......

Race alcohol 10-12:1
Old 09-16-2012, 09:10 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
JoshuaGrooms83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Locust Grove, VA
Posts: 2,105
Received 157 Likes on 122 Posts

Default

thought id dig this up a bit to get some up to date info.
im wondering about 9.5-9.7 CR since this is about what will put my 5.7 to with 317 heads if my math and data is correct.
with that said, would 9.5 be a safer range with 10psi fro my street car without compromising too much out of boost throttle response?
Old 09-20-2012, 08:10 AM
  #16  
Staging Lane
 
VincentT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm also wondering about this. I know meth is a great option to take care of detonation problems under boost when using pump gas. In fact, much of what I've heard runs along the lines of saying that meth is pretty much required with pump gas for anything 10psi of boost or more. But, if I'm going to get a forged rotating assembly anyway, why not get dished pistons to bring the CR down instead?

For instance, I run an LS6, which for my CTS-V Is 400hp stock with a 10.5:1 CR. If my math is right, dropping the CR even as drastically as down to 8.5:1 would only sacrifice around 25 hp with no boost. Is that loss of low end power the only problem when dropping the CR? If it is, it seems acceptable for a mainly street car on pump gas.
Old 09-20-2012, 12:41 PM
  #17  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
L92 fox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wood river IL
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My motor is 10 to 1 and with the cam it is still 8.8 to 1. I plan on running 15-16 psi on pump gas with meth. I don't see the reason to run a really low compression ratio like 8 to 1. It would feel like a dog out of boost. And I know people say you can run more boost with less compression but most people run factory cast heads that shouldn't be pushed past 20 psi in most cases.

Nitroused383 motor is 11 to 1 with 130000 miles on it an he made 700+ whp on pump gas I believe. My factory turbo f150 has 10 to 1 with 15+ psi, granted it uses direct injection but it is still on 93 octane.
Old 09-20-2012, 01:33 PM
  #18  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
godlyxdan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

To answer your "For Instance", no a 2 point drop in compression would net you a much bigger loss than 25hp. It would feel like a dog out of boost. General consensus says that CR in the 9's seems to be the best place to be for boost. Really depends on turbo specs, power your looking for, and boost you'll be running etc... But you'll hate 8's trust me
Old 09-20-2012, 02:44 PM
  #19  
Launching!
 
Ironmancan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

My street car has 10.6 to 1 I had about 9.5 to one and I really like the additional compression it's noticeable to me. Not being a purpose built drag car I would keep as much compression as you can. Im seeing 741hp with 14 lbs of boost and meth. I will be mounting up some bigger turbos shortly and seeing what they will give me.

For a street car how much power do you want? 1k hp sounds nice but your not going to hook that kind of power or use it on the street so what's the point. I will need the additional power to run 200 in a mile event if it wasn't for that I would have stayed with the smaller turbos.

Obviously if we're talking a drag car the lower compression would be ideal. My street car acts like stock, no loss in low end performance and it's a lot of fun in boost. I'm limited in the kind of boost I can run but I'm ok with that. My .02 cents.
Old 09-20-2012, 09:02 PM
  #20  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
JoshuaGrooms83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Locust Grove, VA
Posts: 2,105
Received 157 Likes on 122 Posts

Default

so the 9.5-9.7 CR with say a mild cam (224-228 range), T76 .81 AR rear mounted turbo, 10psi, premium gas, and 600 hp goal, would this be a decent street car with every so often track time?

also on a side question, how would the compression be affected with a 228R cam?


Quick Reply: good compression ratio and cam specs to run a turbo on?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22 AM.