Overboost = 906rwhp/975rwtq
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,018
Likes: 51
From: Virginia
Overboost = 906rwhp/975rwtq oops, 23psi. then e boost took over and backed it down. looks like it would have gone near 30. next best pull was 20psi
couple people were videoing that i dont know, if i get the footage i'll post it up.
texaco 93 octane, snow methanol w/ twin nozzles, ambient water/antifreeze in the intercooler
changes from the last time was bs3 from accel, turbonetics 76mm from turbo people from the innovative gt80. i also put a volt booster on but something not working right its going up to 15v and then back down to 12.
oh and of course another set of pistons cuz i since i took a chunk outa one before x mas.
couple people were videoing that i dont know, if i get the footage i'll post it up.
texaco 93 octane, snow methanol w/ twin nozzles, ambient water/antifreeze in the intercooler
changes from the last time was bs3 from accel, turbonetics 76mm from turbo people from the innovative gt80. i also put a volt booster on but something not working right its going up to 15v and then back down to 12.
oh and of course another set of pistons cuz i since i took a chunk outa one before x mas.
Sweet numbers Dave!
What compression ratio is your motor again? It sure did take it like a champ for being 93 octane fuel, no methonal either right? Glad you didn't have any problems.
So was the eboost to blame for the overboosting?
What compression ratio is your motor again? It sure did take it like a champ for being 93 octane fuel, no methonal either right? Glad you didn't have any problems.
So was the eboost to blame for the overboosting?
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,018
Likes: 51
From: Virginia
no the eboost saved my ***.. i moved i to a set point that was waay to high and it caught it. i'm running a bunch of methanol on top. the compression is 8.4ish
Originally Posted by MIGHTYMOUSE
no the eboost saved my ***.. i moved i to a set point that was waay to high and it caught it. i'm running a bunch of methanol on top. the compression is 8.4ish
I can't wait to get my CR down, thinking about either a set of wiseco pistons and 6l heads for the 408 or just selling it and building a totally new super low comp motor.
Trending Topics
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Topdon ONE vs. Artidiag 800 BT2: Which is the Diagnostic Tablet For You?
Pouria Savadkouei
Gas Monkey Built a 6-Wheel Ferrari Testarossa With a Corvette LT4 Engine
Verdad Gallardo
7 Most Reliable High-Performance Engines GM Has Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin
Verdad Gallardo
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
cant you hit those numbers with pump gas an no methanol? I dont think methanol is really a street car either...
I dont want to run methanol or race gas
Sick numbers though, that must feel horrifying. were did it peak at and what was the a/f, I cant tell on the graph
I dont want to run methanol or race gasSick numbers though, that must feel horrifying. were did it peak at and what was the a/f, I cant tell on the graph
Originally Posted by PurEvl
cant you hit those numbers with pump gas an no methanol? I dont think methanol is really a street car either... I dont want to run methanol or race gas
Sick numbers though, that must feel horrifying. were did it peak at and what was the a/f, I cant tell on the graph
I dont want to run methanol or race gasSick numbers though, that must feel horrifying. were did it peak at and what was the a/f, I cant tell on the graph
any ways Dave, how come the RPMs didnt scan, id like to see that.
where were your IAT at?
and next time keep it over 23psi, i thought youd be shooting for 1000+rwhp
congrats awsome numbers
sounds like your going to be needing a parachute to keep it leagal now!
SSU'S Vice Mod
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 0
From: Hazard Co. Maryland
Originally Posted by stoleit
damn!!!! 70ish more hp and 120ish more tq!!! wonder what that would translate down the 1320? mid 9's or like 9.70s? either way thats bookin!
take off about anywhere's from 1~1.5 tenths per 10 HP. Provided he get's the tune and traction figured out. That says what...9.10s 9.20s? Probably Close to what, 148, maybe 150 (definately almost chute time) with a turbo car, since you'll definately see more MPH as that's where they make most of their time in the top end. I guess we're going to have a new QUICKEST/FASTEST 6spd car in our future. Great numbers MM. Oh, I think I see you helping me with setup in the future. But probably not for a few years. Where in VA are you. You can PM that info to me if you want.
Once you get down in the 9's I don't see the old .10 for every 10hp true anymore. It gets much harder to pick up a tenth as you get faster and faster.
Congrats on the numbers and not hurting amything.
Congrats on the numbers and not hurting amything.
SSU'S Vice Mod
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 0
From: Hazard Co. Maryland
Originally Posted by b18c1hybrid
Once you get down in the 9's I don't see the old .10 for every 10hp true anymore. It gets much harder to pick up a tenth as you get faster and faster.
Congrats on the numbers and not hurting amything.
Congrats on the numbers and not hurting amything.
Say what you want about those figures but...I was told by a guy that runs a late 70s full bodies, big tired monte that every 100lbs or about 10hp still holds up to 1~1.5 tenths (and he was running close to the 8s @ Cecil here in MD). Especially if you can the right ways to hook it and put the weight where you needed it the most. Agreed with the impressive numbers and doing it with the ability to pull in and fill up @ the local SUNOCO.
