Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Overboost = 906rwhp/975rwtq

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-27-2005 | 01:08 AM
  #1  
MIGHTYMOUSE's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,010
Likes: 45
From: Virginia
Default Overboost = 906rwhp/975rwtq

oops, 23psi. then e boost took over and backed it down. looks like it would have gone near 30. next best pull was 20psi

couple people were videoing that i dont know, if i get the footage i'll post it up.

texaco 93 octane, snow methanol w/ twin nozzles, ambient water/antifreeze in the intercooler

changes from the last time was bs3 from accel, turbonetics 76mm from turbo people from the innovative gt80. i also put a volt booster on but something not working right its going up to 15v and then back down to 12.

oh and of course another set of pistons cuz i since i took a chunk outa one before x mas.
Old 03-27-2005 | 01:10 AM
  #2  
StoleIt's Avatar
NKAWTG...N
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,760
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, KS
Default

damn!!!! 70ish more hp and 120ish more tq!!! wonder what that would translate down the 1320? mid 9's or like 9.70s? either way thats bookin!
Old 03-27-2005 | 01:13 AM
  #3  
Magic Chicken's Avatar
12 Second Truck Club

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 0
From: The Chicken Ranch, California
Default

holy crap batman! err.. might mouse!

Old 03-27-2005 | 01:16 AM
  #4  
Boostaholic's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,542
Likes: 0
From: Boise, ID
Default

Sweet numbers Dave!

What compression ratio is your motor again? It sure did take it like a champ for being 93 octane fuel, no methonal either right? Glad you didn't have any problems.

So was the eboost to blame for the overboosting?
Old 03-27-2005 | 01:23 AM
  #5  
MIGHTYMOUSE's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,010
Likes: 45
From: Virginia
Default

no the eboost saved my ***.. i moved i to a set point that was waay to high and it caught it. i'm running a bunch of methanol on top. the compression is 8.4ish
Old 03-27-2005 | 01:29 AM
  #6  
Boostaholic's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,542
Likes: 0
From: Boise, ID
Default

Originally Posted by MIGHTYMOUSE
no the eboost saved my ***.. i moved i to a set point that was waay to high and it caught it. i'm running a bunch of methanol on top. the compression is 8.4ish
Ok that sounds about right, well good numbers, and when do you plan to drop some race fuel in there and hit up the dyno again on full boost?

I can't wait to get my CR down, thinking about either a set of wiseco pistons and 6l heads for the 408 or just selling it and building a totally new super low comp motor.
Old 03-27-2005 | 01:32 AM
  #7  
red90cobra's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 0
From: Murphy, Tx
Default

Awesome numbers man, wish I could make those numbers in my dd.

Srun
Old 03-27-2005 | 01:33 AM
  #8  
MIGHTYMOUSE's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,010
Likes: 45
From: Virginia
Default

race gas fo' race cars
Old 03-27-2005 | 07:06 AM
  #9  
PurEvl's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,469
Likes: 0
From: South of Heaven
Default

cant you hit those numbers with pump gas an no methanol? I dont think methanol is really a street car either... I dont want to run methanol or race gas

Sick numbers though, that must feel horrifying. were did it peak at and what was the a/f, I cant tell on the graph
Old 03-27-2005 | 07:08 AM
  #10  
WestSide's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Tx
Default

Did you ever guess you'd be playing with this much power now, back when you were getting rid of Rob's old kit? Thats insane on pump gas.
Old 03-27-2005 | 07:21 AM
  #11  
HellRaiser's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
From: Bucks County, PA
Default

This is one of the sickest street car's on here. Nice number's!
Old 03-27-2005 | 09:07 AM
  #12  
Wicked_Hugger99's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,227
Likes: 1
From: enterprise, AL
Default

thats just nuts!!!!!! awesome!!!
Old 03-27-2005 | 09:48 AM
  #13  
smokinHawk's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,354
Likes: 1
From: Columbus, ohio
Default

Originally Posted by PurEvl
cant you hit those numbers with pump gas an no methanol? I dont think methanol is really a street car either... I dont want to run methanol or race gas

Sick numbers though, that must feel horrifying. were did it peak at and what was the a/f, I cant tell on the graph
come on you sound like brain W

any ways Dave, how come the RPMs didnt scan, id like to see that.
where were your IAT at?
and next time keep it over 23psi, i thought youd be shooting for 1000+rwhp
congrats awsome numbers
sounds like your going to be needing a parachute to keep it leagal now!
Old 03-27-2005 | 09:55 AM
  #14  
MECHAM's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,243
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs
Default

DYNO QUEEN!



interesting...
Old 03-27-2005 | 11:06 AM
  #15  
GregWS6&z28's Avatar
10 Second Club

iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,247
Likes: 0
From: Portsmouth, VA
Default

good job David
Old 03-27-2005 | 11:28 AM
  #16  
NA$TY-TA's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,333
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
Default

SHOW OFF..

Awsome Dave...... You going to try it with over 23psi with race gas to just see if you can hit 1000rwhp??
Kyle
Old 03-27-2005 | 11:35 AM
  #17  
sb427f-car's Avatar
SSU'S Vice Mod

 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 0
From: Hazard Co. Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by stoleit
damn!!!! 70ish more hp and 120ish more tq!!! wonder what that would translate down the 1320? mid 9's or like 9.70s? either way thats bookin!

take off about anywhere's from 1~1.5 tenths per 10 HP. Provided he get's the tune and traction figured out. That says what...9.10s 9.20s? Probably Close to what, 148, maybe 150 (definately almost chute time) with a turbo car, since you'll definately see more MPH as that's where they make most of their time in the top end. I guess we're going to have a new QUICKEST/FASTEST 6spd car in our future. Great numbers MM. Oh, I think I see you helping me with setup in the future. But probably not for a few years. Where in VA are you. You can PM that info to me if you want.
Old 03-27-2005 | 11:44 AM
  #18  
Josh@PremierAutosports's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
From: Memphis
Default

Once you get down in the 9's I don't see the old .10 for every 10hp true anymore. It gets much harder to pick up a tenth as you get faster and faster.

Congrats on the numbers and not hurting amything.
Old 03-27-2005 | 11:47 AM
  #19  
sb427f-car's Avatar
SSU'S Vice Mod

 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 0
From: Hazard Co. Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by b18c1hybrid
Once you get down in the 9's I don't see the old .10 for every 10hp true anymore. It gets much harder to pick up a tenth as you get faster and faster.

Congrats on the numbers and not hurting amything.

Say what you want about those figures but...I was told by a guy that runs a late 70s full bodies, big tired monte that every 100lbs or about 10hp still holds up to 1~1.5 tenths (and he was running close to the 8s @ Cecil here in MD). Especially if you can the right ways to hook it and put the weight where you needed it the most. Agreed with the impressive numbers and doing it with the ability to pull in and fill up @ the local SUNOCO.
Old 03-27-2005 | 11:49 AM
  #20  
Tiago's Avatar
9 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,685
Likes: 0
From: HOUSTON-TX
Default

Thats awesome David!

Some video of that beast would be sweet


Quick Reply: Overboost = 906rwhp/975rwtq



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 PM.