A2A VS A2W. Pro and cons of each
basically in a nutshell
A2W-race only, a better overall system has limitations on street
A2A-best for street and daily use, not as efficient as A2W
hope that helps
Thanks
Ed
Firebird455@gmail.com
I'm kind of curious why you'd say that... Care to explain?
But for simplicity and $ reasons, if it's primarily a street car you will be better off with the air to air. But the a2w will always work better when setup right. It just might cost more, take up more space, and be more complicated.
A2W is better for drag racing if you have a large enough reservoir and can use ice. It's also useful if you don't have much space where you could put a properly-sized A2A. Your application will determine which works best for you.
In Corky Bell's book "Supercharged!" he says: "When space permits an adequately sized air-to-air intercooler to be fitted and given access to decent airflow, it will always prove superior. The only excuse for a liquid-based intercooler is when severe space restrictions exist or the vehicle is intended for drag racing or maximum-speed runs, where an iced coolant can be used...".
Jim
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
-cobra
-lightning
-Mercedez
-jaguar
-Toyotas (some models)
-Typhoon/cyclone
-Auzzie Subies
and many more. Factory setups are designed by engineers, wonder why they would pick this setup, must work better or be somehow more efficient
It just depends on what you're building the car for. In my opinion, space is also a huge factor, that's why I am going A2W. Also, the electric pump on an A2W system is one more thing to break.
Both A2W and A2A will do a fine job... would probably want to stay away from the A2W if you were going to be under boost for long periods of time (like racing on a road track) and might lean towards A2W when drag racing. Both are fine for street driving.
Last edited by FastKat; Jan 27, 2006 at 11:01 AM.






