TIG welding hotside question.
Here's a pic of the weld that I suspect is a fusion weld, what to you think?
Edit: I can't see your picture at work since images are blocked but I will take a look when I get home later for you.
Edit: I can't see your picture at work since images are blocked but I will take a look when I get home later for you.
Trending Topics
Thanks, I was using 3/32 to practice and it was messy, think I'll try some .045 and see if I can make it look clean.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
If done properly the joint will withstand hundreds of PSI.
Simply butting up two clean ends and welding them together with the appropriate heat will
penetrate the tubing creating a bead on the inside as well.
For a smooth bead on the inside of the tubing use argon as a purge.
You can add filler material as needed but be aware of the metal depositing on the inside of the tubing.
You see fusion processes performed in all sanitary food grade environments where the inside of the tubing can not have excessive penetration. This is done to alleviate the possibility of food product particles getting caught in the "penetrating weld"
If that would occur the stuck particle can spoil creating a contaminated batch.
Last edited by Derek @ EDO; Jun 24, 2008 at 04:02 PM.
If done properly the joint will withstand hundreds of PSI.
Simply butting up two clean ends and welding them together with the appropriate heat will
penetrate the tubing creating a bead on the inside as well.
For a smooth bead on the inside of the tubing use argon as a purge.
You can add filler material as needed but be aware of the metal depositing on the inside of the tubing.
You see fusion processes performed in all sanitary food grade environments where the inside of the tubing can not have excessive penetration. This is done to alleviate the possibility of food product particles getting caught in the "penetrating weld"
If that would occur the stuck particle can spoil creating a contaminated batch.
Very interesting info, thanks!
Your very welcome. And to explain why....
You should only have to see at max 55 amps +/- to weld standard exhaust pipe in mild steel or stainless steel form. The effective range of 1/16 tungesten is right in that range, where-as 3/32 tungsten is pushing it on the effective range, you can do it with a very long taper. But 1/16 makes life easier.
For filler rod, 1/16 is what you want simply because it makes over depositing less likely to happen. You mentioned above that you were having this issue. It should go away now if you leave your technique alone, If I assume right.
Also, 309l filler metal is for disimilar metals like MS to SS. It works great on SS to SS aswell. Its just more useful, a bit more expensive, but it serves more then one purpose compared to a 308 filler rod.
Hope that helps a bit more
You should only have to see at max 55 amps +/- to weld standard exhaust pipe in mild steel or stainless steel form. The effective range of 1/16 tungesten is right in that range, where-as 3/32 tungsten is pushing it on the effective range, you can do it with a very long taper. But 1/16 makes life easier.
For filler rod, 1/16 is what you want simply because it makes over depositing less likely to happen. You mentioned above that you were having this issue. It should go away now if you leave your technique alone, If I assume right.
Also, 309l filler metal is for disimilar metals like MS to SS. It works great on SS to SS aswell. Its just more useful, a bit more expensive, but it serves more then one purpose compared to a 308 filler rod.
Hope that helps a bit more


Gonna pick up some 309 because I'm sure @ some point I will have to weld some MS to SS.



