APS TT Tubing Problems
How about acknowledging that your modified intake ducts were the only reason that you were able to achieve the advertised numbers that you did. It's not our fault that you did not use production pieces on your test car. It's APS's fault that APS sold kits that do not perform as advertised.
I read some stuff about APS kits with the Vette kits but didn't believe with the way the kit was presented and the way you acted while you were trying to sell the kits. Now that you've sold them APS seems to be completely unwilling to spend a dime to correct it's own mistakes.
APS supplied a very complete twin turbo system at an awesome price (virtually no profit as an introdutory offer) and on time as promised to EVERY customer in the US. OK, there have been a couple of small glitches in the system and we have redesigned parts to upgrade the twin turbo system. You can either choose to buy the upgrade parts or not (that's certainly your call) and then enjoy your car at higher boost levels.
I won't keep posting in this thread as I have said and done all I can to help you.
Thanks,
Peter
Last edited by Inspector12; Aug 29, 2008 at 04:31 AM.

Peter
And if not.
Peter, can i send you my old ones for , idk lets say, $150 refund toward the new tubes. i didn't want these oes to begin with.
Honestly i sent you 5000 plus dollars for a kit that will support 18psi. i don't car if it cost me a few more bucks. like $50 for shipping. or if i buy ducts you pay for shipping. something like that.
alot of us are mad. we paid X amount ofr bad *** 18psi front mount kit. please just talk to your boss or have him eamil me. hell send me 50 kits and i can get them turned around i will do that for free if everyone gets a kit.
Thanks Peter, hope APS(you) can make the right choice.
Last edited by Big Bird WS6; Aug 29, 2008 at 08:36 AM.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
but iwas not told i would need to spend 300 dollars to fix an advertised kit. i understand that the little bitching is bad. ok, great. well then peter should meet us half way.
send a box full of those little inlets to a state side dealer. then we can get form dealer for cost of part. APS eats shipping. i pay for ducts.
How that sound peter. Meet me half way. you ship box full tl stat side dealer i send them money for 190. they sned me part?
?????????
ps they said with the right motor it will support 1000 hp. they also said that it will support 18psi or boost."The highly specialized turbochargers are based upon custom Mitsubishi gasoline spec turbochargers with an Inconel 713C turbine wheel, liquid cooled bearing housing (50 lbs per minute mass air flow @ 18 PSI), APS single entry .84 A/R turbine housings with external waste gate port/provision and APS designed and manufactured .65 A/R compressor housing." this is right off of APS website.
I have not seen anything in my kit that shows poor quality in fact the opposite. I was shipped my kit promptly ,ahead of schedule . Now hoping the sway bar simple fix also works for me. Mabye need to get bigger spacer or something since want to run my bigger hotchkis sway bar.
Has anyone looked at the ducts closely to see if they coudl just put a stent hard pipe section in there or like that muffler hard pipe that is flexible?
Also same on the sway bars. Can't you just cut the intercooler pipes and put in silicone sections where the pipes would hit?
Seem like cheap simple solutions. Sure the kit is not perfect..STS is not perfect and ATI is not perfect. Know lots of people that had problems with ati units although those might be more in the past. Only know one or two guys local with ati kits and new a couple with sts kits.
In my opinion the APS systems are the best value on the market today. The systems are very complete and well thought out. I am suprised they are able to turn a profit on these considering what is included and what they sell for and I can't imagine how much $$$ is tied up in custom molds, fixtures and machining.
Now, I do agree that the intake tubes should not be collapsing. It is a mistake and will affect anyone trying to push this system. On the other hand, if I owned one of these systems I would not be too terribly upset about spending the 290 on tubes that will not collapse because the systems are rather inexpensive to begin with.
Yes, they are, IMHO, inexpensive. If they sold for 1000-2000 more than they currently do then APS could rather easily absorb any cost with problems such as this. When you offer a system to the public at an inexpensive price and minimal profit, shelling out $15,000 or so to upgrade parts that aren't up to task for some people is a lot harder for a company to do. I think they bring some awesome products to the market and would like to see them stay around and offer those products at a good price rather than raising prices or being buried financially by small issues.
I want to be clear that I'm not speaking for APS, just offering my opinion. (Which may be slightly skewed, as after fabricating custom turbo systems for years, minor issues such as this seem less signifigant to me).
The fact that APS did their testing without using the kit exactly as it was to be supplied to the customers was a mistake on their part and APS should own up to this and supply everyone who has the inferior ducts with new ones that will allow the kit to perform as it was originally advertised to do. They've already paid for this and should not have to pay anything more than they have. Doesn't matter if people paid 3 grand, 5 grand, 10 grand... APS advertised the kit to do something it cannot do as it was supplied. Why should people have to pay for APS's mistake to make their kit work as it should have in the first place? If you bought a set of wheels that were advertised to be 11 inches wide for X amount of dollars, and they are 9 inches wide when you receive them and then you are told by the manufacturer that you can get them in the 11's that you paid for already, but you would have to pay extra for them now.... does that seem right? This is the same kind of thing. The kits were advertised to do X for X amount of dollars and they will not. So those people did not get what they paid for, regardless of what the price was. Why should anyone with the kits pay another dime? They've already paid for their kits and they should have what they paid for, which is a product that will do what was advertised.
On the anti-swaybar denting the pipes deal.... people should not have dented pipes with a stock bar, at stock height... period. This makes me think the car the kits were designed on was not road tested either near enough or at all. I guarantee people would have preferred to have waited another few weeks for their kits for this issue to have been addressed when they were first being developed than to get the kits and have to deal with it now. If a redesign of the tubes was not possible and the spacers for the swaybar mounts was still the answer then they could have been supplied with the kits. But it's now a known issue, and like the hoses collapsing, the spacers should also be sent out to those who request them. As has been suggested, pack up a bunch of them, get them to a stateside dealer and distribute from there since shipping is so high to get them to the states individually.
Wasn't it APS that came here during the wake of the HiFlo ordeal and talked about what a big deal customer service is to them, and how they wanted to bring a product for LS1 f-bodies that would perform, ship quickly, and have the wonderful customer service to go with it? Where is that great customer service now... because I sure don't see it in here.
The fact that APS did their testing without using the kit exactly as it was to be supplied to the customers was a mistake on their part and APS should own up to this and supply everyone who has the inferior ducts with new ones that will allow the kit to perform as it was originally advertised to do. They've already paid for this and should not have to pay anything more than they have. Doesn't matter if people paid 3 grand, 5 grand, 10 grand... APS advertised the kit to do something it cannot do as it was supplied. Why should people have to pay for APS's mistake to make their kit work as it should have in the first place? If you bought a set of wheels that were advertised to be 11 inches wide for X amount of dollars, and they are 9 inches wide when you receive them and then you are told by the manufacturer that you can get them in the 11's that you paid for already, but you would have to pay extra for them now.... does that seem right? This is the same kind of thing. The kits were advertised to do X for X amount of dollars and they will not. So those people did not get what they paid for, regardless of what the price was. Why should anyone with the kits pay another dime? They've already paid for their kits and they should have what they paid for, which is a product that will do what was advertised.
On the anti-swaybar denting the pipes deal.... people should not have dented pipes with a stock bar, at stock height... period. This makes me think the car the kits were designed on was not road tested either near enough or at all. I guarantee people would have preferred to have waited another few weeks for their kits for this issue to have been addressed when they were first being developed than to get the kits and have to deal with it now. If a redesign of the tubes was not possible and the spacers for the swaybar mounts was still the answer then they could have been supplied with the kits. But it's now a known issue, and like the hoses collapsing, the spacers should also be sent out to those who request them. As has been suggested, pack up a bunch of them, get them to a stateside dealer and distribute from there since shipping is so high to get them to the states individually.
Wasn't it APS that came here during the wake of the HiFlo ordeal and talked about what a big deal customer service is to them, and how they wanted to bring a product for LS1 f-bodies that would perform, ship quickly, and have the wonderful customer service to go with it? Where is that great customer service now... because I sure don't see it in here.
Last edited by Inspector12; Aug 31, 2008 at 06:19 AM.






