Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Rear Mount Folks, Some ??'s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-31-2008, 07:57 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
T61M^3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Rear Mount Folks, Some ??'s

Hi Gents:

It seems there is an issue with rear mount kits and the cold side pipe "taking the place of" the drive side subfram connector - are there any solutions on the market for this; or is it one or the other type deal?

Also, this is for an 00 5.7L M6 car - would the 61MM/.8x AR be better for response then say the 67MM/.?? AR ?

Comments welcome....
Old 08-31-2008, 08:04 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (17)
 
ZL1Killa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NC - Charlotte area
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

have you seen my car and what I have done. i think there is only a 60mm and 67mm then 70mm sized turbos, then 76mm. could be wrong.

what cam/heads and what not do yo have so far. we kind of need a better idea of what you are running to be able to judge what TURBO is BEST for your CAR. its not as simple as oh lets get a xxmm turbo.
Old 08-31-2008, 08:08 PM
  #3  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
T61M^3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have not seen your car, I will check it out. Most likely will be the larger chamber truck heads, Z06 Cam, shooting for 500-600whp.
Old 08-31-2008, 08:18 PM
  #4  
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
TransAmcoupe98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

That cam is a great boost cam, If you are looking for fast spool go with a 60-1 with a .81 a/r housing. Looking for more overall power and slightly slower spool, go wiht a gt-67 and reccommend adain the .81 a/r. I also would go with methonal injection as insurance. Depending if you have forged bottom end, you could saefly run 8psi on stock bootom end but its a bit farfetched to acheive 600whp on a stock bottom end...and tranny....and rear end.
Old 08-31-2008, 08:23 PM
  #5  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
T61M^3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TransAmcoupe98
That cam is a great boost cam, If you are looking for fast spool go with a 60-1 with a .81 a/r housing. Looking for more overall power and slightly slower spool, go wiht a gt-67 and reccommend adain the .81 a/r. I also would go with methonal injection as insurance. Depending if you have forged bottom end, you could saefly run 8psi on stock bootom end but its a bit farfetched to acheive 600whp on a stock bottom end...and tranny....and rear end.
The driveline won't be stock as soon as it starts coming apart ( I don't count on the 10 bolt holding, just need it for tuning and getting the bugs worked out)

I don't see what's far fetched about 600whp provided the car is knowledgeable hands...
Old 09-01-2008, 12:46 AM
  #6  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
MonochromeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Personally I'd run a .96 AR and you'll need an intercooler and/or meth to make that kinda power.

At 600 hp its just a matter of time before something major breaks.
Old 09-01-2008, 12:51 AM
  #7  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
T61M^3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No worries, the deck is going to be stacked...

It is an M6 car - I'm trying to avoid a turd. If the 5.7L doesn't have enough to be responsive with the 67mm, the expectations would be realigned.
Old 09-01-2008, 01:05 AM
  #8  
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
MDoe8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Eureka, MO
Posts: 263
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

you'll have plenty of response with a 67mm. Like others said, i wouldn't count on 600rwhp lasting a long time. It's been done, but far and few between
Old 09-01-2008, 01:17 AM
  #9  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
T61M^3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Put me into the few and far between category

600 is kill mode...
Old 09-01-2008, 02:20 AM
  #10  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
cracker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: ATX©
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Do a "top" mount and you wont have any issues!
Old 09-01-2008, 08:28 AM
  #11  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (17)
 
ZL1Killa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NC - Charlotte area
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by cracker
Do a "top" mount and you wont have any issues!

tell zombie that.


ANYWAY... back to REAR MOUNT.
check out my build. either get you a 60mm or 67... personally with all that you are doing I would get the 67mm get that A/R ratio for that 600HP, as the 60mm is a tad small for that.

I'm only going to 500~550HP and at 7psi MAYBE 8psi with my cam so yeh
Old 09-01-2008, 09:24 AM
  #12  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (24)
 
CamaroSS19's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would get the 70 if you want those kind of numbers havent seen anyone with the 60's making as much as you want . The small turbos will become a restriction at the higher power levels ,then all you will be doing is creating heat in the intake charge .

From my reserch none of those turbos will be efficent even on a stock ls1 when looking at a compresor map the only choice that will be in the sweet spot is the 76 IMO .

I know a guy that stoped making power a 4k with the 67 cause the turbo flowed about as much as the stock motor could pump and he had a decent size cam in it .

If you do push that much power either way on stock drivetrain your pushing it . You could do it but for how long do you want your car to run after a big project like this cause it may only be a week or two
Old 09-01-2008, 10:20 AM
  #13  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
T61M^3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Again, please don't worry about things out of your control, I won't come back looking for sympathy.

There's still some issues - sub frame connectors - is everyone not running a driver side?
Old 09-01-2008, 02:19 PM
  #14  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Silver_TransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Antonio, Tx
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I think the 67mm turbo is going to be too small for that kind of power and is maxed out at 15psi. Then u take into acount that u have about 2psi pressure drop through the sts piping, another 2-3psi for intercooler, and if u have a low lsa cam another 2psi. I had one and got about 500rwhp @7psi, and it was pretty muched maxed out. I just put on a tc76 out back and running 10psi right now, still on the 10bolt(3.42gears and t/a performance cover).
Hoping it will dyno at 600+ now.

As for the subframe thing I am not sure, I dont have any. Sorry.
Old 09-01-2008, 03:23 PM
  #15  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (24)
 
CamaroSS19's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by T61M^3
Again, please don't worry about things out of your control, I won't come back looking for sympathy.

There's still some issues - sub frame connectors - is everyone not running a driver side?
So if you dont care if the motor will last

The SFC should be no problem I know lots of guys with 10 sec cars with SFC at all . I just took both mine out these cars have a pretty storng frame compared to lets say something terriable like a fox body mustang
Old 09-01-2008, 09:36 PM
  #16  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (17)
 
ZL1Killa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NC - Charlotte area
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by T61M^3
Again, please don't worry about things out of your control, I won't come back looking for sympathy.

There's still some issues - sub frame connectors - is everyone not running a driver side?
if you run only 1 subframe connector you risk twisting permanently the chassis. think about it.

get a 67 or 70mm turbo, ... i would get a 70mm.
Old 09-01-2008, 10:22 PM
  #17  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Schantin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ft. Irwin, California (But Virginia is home)
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post

Default

I think you can hit 600RWHP fine on a -67 turbo. However, I don't think you can hit the goal safely on a stock bottom end.

I put down 453RWHP on 5PSI and a conservative AFR. 7-8PSI would definetly have gotten me over the 500RWHP hurdle. 12PSI will get you in the 600's w/ adequate fuel + good tuning. Your stock rod bolts will be blowing through the block sooner rather than later w/ that kind of HP and pressure though. So.....build the bottom end and then yes, totally doable.

BTW, that 453 I quoted was using 72cc heads for a 9:1 compression, so a low compression rebuild for big boost would support these numbers Your ZO6 cn choice is also sound. Another option is the CC228 on a 115LSA. It worked well for me when boosted.

Subframes.....SOL. Adding one is a recipe for disaster, as the intake pipe will have some kind of flex to it. Add a cage. Basically a "subframe" from the inside. Leave out the center bar if you need the rear seat.
Old 09-01-2008, 11:12 PM
  #18  
Launching!
iTrader: (14)
 
jeffboy757's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: san jose ca
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hey, i designed my own charge pipe, and its not the best pic, but i have the big boxed triangle slp subframe connectors welded in, and i ran my charge pipe right along it.

Old 09-02-2008, 05:07 AM
  #19  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
T61M^3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Schantin
I think you can hit 600RWHP fine on a -67 turbo. However, I don't think you can hit the goal safely on a stock bottom end.

I put down 453RWHP on 5PSI and a conservative AFR. 7-8PSI would definitely have gotten me over the 500RWHP hurdle. 12PSI will get you in the 600's w/ adequate fuel + good tuning. Your stock rod bolts will be blowing through the block sooner rather than later w/ that kind of HP and pressure though. So.....build the bottom end and then yes, totally doable.

BTW, that 453 I quoted was using 72cc heads for a 9:1 compression, so a low compression rebuild for big boost would support these numbers Your ZO6 cn choice is also sound. Another option is the CC228 on a 115LSA. It worked well for me when boosted.

Subframes.....SOL. Adding one is a recipe for disaster, as the intake pipe will have some kind of flex to it. Add a cage. Basically a "subframe" from the inside. Leave out the center bar if you need the rear seat.

The rod bolts will be changed when the K is lowered and oil pan tapped; no plans to rev past 6,000. I know enough about drag racing and unibody design to say I'm not going without SFCs as I don't deem a cage necessary for weekend warrior (Not out to break any records.)

Jeff - Thanks for the picture.
Old 09-02-2008, 07:52 AM
  #20  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (17)
 
ZL1Killa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NC - Charlotte area
Posts: 3,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Silver_TransAm
I think the 67mm turbo is going to be too small for that kind of power and is maxed out at 15psi. Then u take into acount that u have about 2psi pressure drop through the sts piping, another 2-3psi for intercooler, and if u have a low lsa cam another 2psi. I had one and got about 500rwhp @7psi, and it was pretty muched maxed out. I just put on a tc76 out back and running 10psi right now, still on the 10bolt(3.42gears and t/a performance cover).
Hoping it will dyno at 600+ now.

As for the subframe thing I am not sure, I dont have any. Sorry.
first of all, with JUST the STS piping you don't lose any boost, if you do it is very little.

you usually lose 2-3psi through an intercooler like you said.


Quick Reply: Rear Mount Folks, Some ??'s



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:52 AM.