Best TC from a roll
Looking at some graphs
http://www.converter.cc/super_yank_3500_dyno.htm
http://www.converter.cc/super_yank_4000_dyno.htm
It seems that the 4000 has a larger increase in power right after any shift then the 3500, however the 3500 has much better top end.
From this view alone which one would be better for this application.
Also for anyone who has driven a car with the SY4000? Is it useable as an everyday car?
thanks
Super Yanks are great converters... but the Thruster Pro series ROCKS from a roll.
A TP-4400 with 3.73 is IMO the quickest "from a roll" (and anywhere else) converter out there.
If you are changing from a stock converter, you should drive someone's car before going to a 4000 stall. Test either a 4000/3.73 or 3500/3.23 car (not quite as loose, but close) before buying. The SY 3500 and 3.73s is a very streetable combo for most people.
Why is it better then the SY-3500 and SY-4000?
On the graph I see that the TP 4400 has just over 300 hp at 3,500 rpm. The SY-3500 would have maybe 10 or 15hp under 300hp at 3,500rpm but the SY-3500 has hp gain on the entire curve Even in the high end. So even with more high end hp the 3500 is not as fast?
How much of a difference are we talking about? I want my car to be streetable. How high will I have to rev before my car starts moving normally with the 4400?
<small>[ April 11, 2002, 08:58 AM: Message edited by: AlienDroid ]</small>
I use 2600 - 2900 rpm in typical moderate traffic around town before lock-up, 3300 to get moving quickly. you can still do parking lot manuevers at low rpms (e.g. 1000 - 1200).
A SY 3500 will use around 400 rpm less on average in town than the YTP 4200. If you've never driven a car with a converter, it would be as big as I would go for a daily driver. The car will feel much stronger from a roll (and off the line).
Besides, Yank website says that TP4400 has 2.7 STR. Would decreasing the STR to say 2.2 increase its top end pull even more?
I think that they are too loose for someone who mostly drives on the highway.
I would say 4000 stall max.
Trending Topics
The only downside is the looseness around town. If you can live with it, you will be hard to pass.
The Ultra Thrusters are too loose for anything less than a 8000 rpm motor when racing from a roll.

2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2022 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 S&B CAI, Corsa catback.
2023 Corvette 3LT Z51 soon to be modified.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
So which one is faster from a roll. The SY 3500 or SY 4000? Is it significant?
Higher stall converters tend to be smaller and weigh less also right?
<small>[ April 11, 2002, 01:24 PM: Message edited by: AlienDroid ]</small>
<strong>Ragtop 99, what about the 1st-2nd upshift, is it different from the 2nd-3rd one.
</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">The gear drop on the 2-3 is less than the 1-2, so even w/o a high stall converter, your rpms would not drop as much on the 2-3.
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">
So which one is faster from a roll. The SY 3500 or SY 4000? Is it significant?
</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">SY 4000. Depends on the speed you start from. The closer you are to the upshift (and therefore lower in the rpms) the more the higher stall benefits your power.
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">
Higher stall converters tend to be smaller and weigh less also right?
</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">True, but it is not a linear relationship.
<strong>
Besides, Yank website says that TP4400 has 2.7 STR. Would decreasing the STR to say 2.2 increase its top end pull even more?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I discussed doing that with Mike and we decided that if we were succesful in finding the right stator, the result would be a 4400 converter that felt like a 4800 - 5000 stall from a looseness standpoint.
<strong>...I see Yank also has ULTRA THRUSTER & ULTRA YANK converters. Any one tried these?
</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I have a UT-4600.. and for a Stock Internals car.. it's to much. Sure, my car runs good with the UT.. but I bet it will be faster with a TP-4400.
The UT-4600 would be a GREAT converter for a Heads and Cam car or upgraded valvetrain willing to "wring" it out to 7000rpm on a pass.
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Patrick G:
<strong>...The Ultra Thrusters are too loose for anything less than a 8000 rpm motor when racing from a roll.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I completely agree!
<small>[ April 12, 2002, 12:07 PM: Message edited by: WILWAXU ]</small>





