2011 stangs on sale today
06-05-2010, 07:39 AM
#62
Launching!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Miami
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is from a Superchevy January it looks to me like the Mustang responded better to mods than the Camaro did.
http://www.superchevy.com/technical/...ads/index.html
Carmaro BASELINE, BONE STOCK 2.05 13.25 @ 106.42 [Evolution 2011 Stang ran 12.61 @ 108 mph with a 1.96 60ft on the factory street tires?]
Camaro BONE STOCK W/TUNE 1.99 12.94 @ 108.39 [Evolution Performance Mustang Bone stock with DRs 12.04 @ 117mph - 1.70 60ft on DOT legal tires]
Camaro with CAM, HEADERS/EXHAUST, TUNE 1.93 12.27 @ 114.54
Camaro CAM, HEADERS/EXHAUST HEADS,SLP Blackwing CAI, TUNE, DRs 1.86 11.81 @ 119.27 [Evolution Performance,Mustang 11.65@119MPH Drop filter, Tune, OR X pipe, cat back, MT ET Streets bogarts]
http://www.superchevy.com/technical/...ads/index.html
Carmaro BASELINE, BONE STOCK 2.05 13.25 @ 106.42 [Evolution 2011 Stang ran 12.61 @ 108 mph with a 1.96 60ft on the factory street tires?]
Camaro BONE STOCK W/TUNE 1.99 12.94 @ 108.39 [Evolution Performance Mustang Bone stock with DRs 12.04 @ 117mph - 1.70 60ft on DOT legal tires]
Camaro with CAM, HEADERS/EXHAUST, TUNE 1.93 12.27 @ 114.54
Camaro CAM, HEADERS/EXHAUST HEADS,SLP Blackwing CAI, TUNE, DRs 1.86 11.81 @ 119.27 [Evolution Performance,Mustang 11.65@119MPH Drop filter, Tune, OR X pipe, cat back, MT ET Streets bogarts]
Wait, they are claiming a 9 MPH trap speed IMPROVEMENT from switching from street tires to dr's? That is BS.
06-05-2010, 07:58 AM
#63
Teching In
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From my understanding they hit the rev limiter and lifted in 4th gear. That's why the mph was 108. The 117 was with a tune so they didn't hit the rev limiter.
FWIW, They just picked up 32rwhp from a set of longtubes and x-pipe. Stock mufflers.
http://www.modularfords.com/forums/s...-Headers-ALONE!
Last edited by 2vkiller; 06-05-2010 at 08:05 AM.
06-05-2010, 09:00 AM
#64
This is from a Superchevy January it looks to me like the Mustang responded better to mods than the Camaro did.
http://www.superchevy.com/technical/...ads/index.html
Carmaro BASELINE, BONE STOCK 2.05 13.25 @ 106.42 [Evolution 2011 Stang ran 12.61 @ 108 mph with a 1.96 60ft on the factory street tires?]
Camaro BONE STOCK W/TUNE 1.99 12.94 @ 108.39 [Evolution Performance Mustang Bone stock with DRs 12.04 @ 117mph - 1.70 60ft on DOT legal tires]
Camaro with CAM, HEADERS/EXHAUST, TUNE 1.93 12.27 @ 114.54
Camaro CAM, HEADERS/EXHAUST HEADS,SLP Blackwing CAI, TUNE, DRs 1.86 11.81 @ 119.27 [Evolution Performance,Mustang 11.65@119MPH Drop filter, Tune, OR X pipe, cat back, MT ET Streets bogarts]
http://www.superchevy.com/technical/...ads/index.html
Carmaro BASELINE, BONE STOCK 2.05 13.25 @ 106.42 [Evolution 2011 Stang ran 12.61 @ 108 mph with a 1.96 60ft on the factory street tires?]
Camaro BONE STOCK W/TUNE 1.99 12.94 @ 108.39 [Evolution Performance Mustang Bone stock with DRs 12.04 @ 117mph - 1.70 60ft on DOT legal tires]
Camaro with CAM, HEADERS/EXHAUST, TUNE 1.93 12.27 @ 114.54
Camaro CAM, HEADERS/EXHAUST HEADS,SLP Blackwing CAI, TUNE, DRs 1.86 11.81 @ 119.27 [Evolution Performance,Mustang 11.65@119MPH Drop filter, Tune, OR X pipe, cat back, MT ET Streets bogarts]
06-05-2010, 09:11 AM
#65
On The Tree
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did you also run a faster time than Evolution did bone stock?
Last edited by FOG52; 06-05-2010 at 09:17 AM.
06-05-2010, 09:26 AM
#66
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tomball,TX
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is from a Superchevy January it looks to me like the Mustang responded better to mods than the Camaro did.
http://www.superchevy.com/technical/...ads/index.html
Carmaro BASELINE, BONE STOCK 2.05 13.25 @ 106.42 [Evolution 2011 Stang ran 12.61 @ 108 mph with a 1.96 60ft on the factory street tires?]
Camaro BONE STOCK W/TUNE 1.99 12.94 @ 108.39 [Evolution Performance Mustang Bone stock with DRs 12.04 @ 117mph - 1.70 60ft on DOT legal tires]
Camaro with CAM, HEADERS/EXHAUST, TUNE 1.93 12.27 @ 114.54
Camaro CAM, HEADERS/EXHAUST HEADS,SLP Blackwing CAI, TUNE, DRs 1.86 11.81 @ 119.27 [Evolution Performance,Mustang 11.65@119MPH Drop filter, Tune, OR X pipe, cat back, MT ET Streets bogarts]
http://www.superchevy.com/technical/...ads/index.html
Carmaro BASELINE, BONE STOCK 2.05 13.25 @ 106.42 [Evolution 2011 Stang ran 12.61 @ 108 mph with a 1.96 60ft on the factory street tires?]
Camaro BONE STOCK W/TUNE 1.99 12.94 @ 108.39 [Evolution Performance Mustang Bone stock with DRs 12.04 @ 117mph - 1.70 60ft on DOT legal tires]
Camaro with CAM, HEADERS/EXHAUST, TUNE 1.93 12.27 @ 114.54
Camaro CAM, HEADERS/EXHAUST HEADS,SLP Blackwing CAI, TUNE, DRs 1.86 11.81 @ 119.27 [Evolution Performance,Mustang 11.65@119MPH Drop filter, Tune, OR X pipe, cat back, MT ET Streets bogarts]
06-05-2010, 09:50 AM
#67
On The Tree
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06-06-2010, 12:16 AM
#68
This is ridiculous. Do you ever read the **** you post on this site? They tested an L99 auto Camaro. Go find me an LS3 or an auto 5.0 to make a real comparison. Better yet, find me a real owner to run those times. All you talk about is the Evolution car. If it's so easy to run those times then show me a car not tested by a ford based performance shop.
06-06-2010, 09:04 AM
#70
On The Tree
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is ridiculous. Do you ever read the **** you post on this site? They tested an L99 auto Camaro. Go find me an LS3 or an auto 5.0 to make a real comparison. Better yet, find me a real owner to run those times. All you talk about is the Evolution car. If it's so easy to run those times then show me a car not tested by a ford based performance shop.
06-06-2010, 09:06 AM
#71
On The Tree
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
\
Great come back
No seriously do you not think the folks at Super Chevy weren't trying to make the car go fast with Cams, HEADS, exhaust, headers, DRs, CAI, and tune? Or maybe they are just ******* idiots in your humble opinion.
Great come back
No seriously do you not think the folks at Super Chevy weren't trying to make the car go fast with Cams, HEADS, exhaust, headers, DRs, CAI, and tune? Or maybe they are just ******* idiots in your humble opinion.
Last edited by FOG52; 06-06-2010 at 09:13 AM.
06-06-2010, 09:06 AM
#72
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tomball,TX
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So the private owner of the Camaro did his own mod work? Owner times will come. There isn't even an after market for these engines yet. Wait to you start seeing the ported heads the CAI the cams etc. Better times for private owners are ahead. Remember that Camaro had heads and Cams. It just ran 10.96 with a procharger added presumably by as shop . The Evo car went 10.97 NA with lightening and stock heads stock cam and drop in filter.
06-06-2010, 09:17 AM
#75
On The Tree
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06-06-2010, 09:41 AM
#77
On The Tree
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Honestly I'm not sure why you are crying foul. I posted published results from a noted source for the Camaro for a Heads, Cam, Header, Exhaust, CAI, Drs LS3 2010 Camaro and you aren't satisfied. Evos car is the best I can give you at the moment because there are so few out and almost no mod market out. Heck there aren't even tuner out for them. I'm not sure how Jon Lund tuned the thing. JPC got their 2011 to 10.96 with a stock tune and a 100 shot with stock cats.
06-06-2010, 09:53 AM
#78
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tomball,TX
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Honestly I'm not sure why you are crying foul. I posted published results from a noted source for the Camaro for a Heads, Cam, Header, Exhaust, CAI, Drs LS3 2010 Camaro and you aren't satisfied. Evos car is the best I can give you at the moment because there are so few out and almost no mod market out. Heck there aren't even tuner out for them. I'm not sure how Jon Lund tuned the thing. JPC got their 2011 to 10.96 with a stock tune and a 100 shot with stock cats.
06-06-2010, 10:17 AM
#79
Launching!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Miami
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From my understanding they hit the rev limiter and lifted in 4th gear. That's why the mph was 108. The 117 was with a tune so they didn't hit the rev limiter.
FWIW, They just picked up 32rwhp from a set of longtubes and x-pipe. Stock mufflers.
http://www.modularfords.com/forums/s...-Headers-ALONE!
FWIW, They just picked up 32rwhp from a set of longtubes and x-pipe. Stock mufflers.
http://www.modularfords.com/forums/s...-Headers-ALONE!
06-06-2010, 10:22 AM
#80
TECH Regular
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
