Gen 5 Camaro External Bolt-On Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

4th Gen vs. 5th Gen profile comparo. *pic*

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-25-2011, 11:27 AM
  #301  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Dark SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by BADD SS
IF there is one thing I have it's factual information.... I especially love how I had to tell fifth gen owners in here that your cars ARE more than 300 lbs heavier than 4th gens.... "only 4th gens have bad drivers" nope, it applies to 5th gens as well, keep putting words in my mouth though... And if you could read, you wouldnt have made that statement a couple posts back.
No you don't. You tried telling me that 5th gens don't mile per hour. You have been trying to say that 5th gens are slow and they can compete with a 4th gen yet you use apples to oranges comparisons. I don't think you even know how dumb you make yourself sound with you lack of 5th gen knowledge but you still try to put up a one sided argument and try to tell me I can't read. Lol, hilarious.
Old 09-25-2011, 05:41 PM
  #302  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
BADD SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Baldwin, NY
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Dark SS
No you don't. You tried telling me that 5th gens don't mile per hour. You have been trying to say that 5th gens are slow and they can compete with a 4th gen yet you use apples to oranges comparisons. I don't think you even know how dumb you make yourself sound with you lack of 5th gen knowledge but you still try to put up a one sided argument and try to tell me I can't read. Lol, hilarious.
Just eat it already show me proof of your precious car MPH'ing better than a fourth gen, with similar mods...I went through the list, your bolt on cars average 111 mph, thats identical to a fourth gen. You obviously have no idea what you are talking about AT ALL with regards to racing, because hp/weight and gearing matter the most. There is no MAGICAL thing about ls3's in a 3900+ lb car that makes it mph any more than a fourth gen. You just dont seem to get performance wise, at least in a straight line, you are not superior...


Go back to moderating chicago 5th gen, you obviously are better with a computer than you are in your knowledge of racing.....

PS, im a real dummy, I built an n/a 366 that picks up 31-32 mph on the back half... I know all about what a car that pulls up top is all about, you have no clue, im certain of that.
Old 09-25-2011, 09:52 PM
  #303  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Dark SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by BADD SS
Just eat it already show me proof of your precious car MPH'ing better than a fourth gen, with similar mods...I went through the list, your bolt on cars average 111 mph, thats identical to a fourth gen. You obviously have no idea what you are talking about AT ALL with regards to racing, because hp/weight and gearing matter the most. There is no MAGICAL thing about ls3's in a 3900+ lb car that makes it mph any more than a fourth gen. You just dont seem to get performance wise, at least in a straight line, you are not superior...


Go back to moderating chicago 5th gen, you obviously are better with a computer than you are in your knowledge of racing.....

PS, im a real dummy, I built an n/a 366 that picks up 31-32 mph on the back half... I know all about what a car that pulls up top is all about, you have no clue, im certain of that.
Oh, because you built a race car you knowledge of cars is far superior to mine. Stock LS3's trap about 110, where are your stock LS1's that do that?? The LS3 comes with 100 bhp more than any 4th gen produced, there's your "magical thing". That out weighs the 300 lbs. and there for will make for a better MPH. I don't know where your getting your facts but the bolt-on 5th gen fast list averages about 115mph, here's your facts http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=52264 Now what "facts" are you going to pull out of your ***?
Old 09-25-2011, 10:45 PM
  #304  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
s346k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: johnson co.
Posts: 3,433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

i don't see how it's fair at all to compare a modded 4th gen to a modded 5th gen. the ls1 cars weren't near as fast so early in their lives as they are now. give the 5th gen cars 12 years to develop aftermarket parts, try setups, make and break parts etc and they will be quicker/faster. the ls3 is a monster. hands down, it will make power all over an ls1. the engine is more than capable of overcoming the weight in the 5th gen cars.

pull weight in those cars, replace the drivetrain with something that is 1/4 mile friendly and they will fly.

i personally do not like much of anything (other than the ls3) about the 5th gen cars, in all honesty i don't like the 4th gen cars that much, just the power parts. i do think the 4th gen cars (camaro and trans am alike) look better than the 5th gen.
Old 09-26-2011, 08:04 AM
  #305  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
BADD SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Baldwin, NY
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Dark SS
Oh, because you built a race car you knowledge of cars is far superior to mine. Stock LS3's trap about 110, where are your stock LS1's that do that?? The LS3 comes with 100 bhp more than any 4th gen produced, there's your "magical thing". That out weighs the 300 lbs. and there for will make for a better MPH. I don't know where your getting your facts but the bolt-on 5th gen fast list averages about 115mph, here's your facts http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=52264 Now what "facts" are you going to pull out of your ***?
I pulled the numbers from this section, timeslips/ boltons. I saw I/h/e cars, most trapping 110-112 with a few 114. A stock 4th gen no mods what so ever traps 108-109 in a six speed. I/h/e they trap 110-113 usually so thats close enough. Your not walking away from a fourth gen stock for stock unless its hurt.....

You cant seem to comprehend that its alot more than a 300 lb weight difference, are you dense?
Old 09-26-2011, 09:33 AM
  #306  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Dark SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

117 compared too 113 on the back half is walking away. I guess that makes me dense. You should write a drag racing book. It's a crime not to share your wealth of knowledge with the world!
Old 09-26-2011, 12:03 PM
  #307  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Talking averages:
take the top 38 bolt-on 5th gens(from link above) and average the trap speed = 113mph, fastest=117mph
take the top 27 na internally modded 5th gens (from link above) and average trap speed = 117mph, fastest=121mph
take the top 50 bolt-on 4th gens(https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-raci...1-74-bump.html) and average trap speed = 116mph, Fastest=124mph

Last edited by kinglt-1; 09-26-2011 at 01:19 PM.
Old 09-26-2011, 01:21 PM
  #308  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Dark SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Bolt-on 10.6 @ 122?? Isn't the bolt-on record for the LS1 a high 11? As stated above we're looking at 13 years of racing one car to 2 of another. If that is an actual bolt-on list then the slowest car out of 50 is an 11.7, I have never seen a bolt-on LS1 close to 11's. I've witnessed a bolt-on LS1 with a150 shot only trap a 117.
Old 09-26-2011, 01:24 PM
  #309  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dark SS
Bolt-on 10.6 @ 122?? That a stock internal list. Not a true bolt-on list like on Camaro5. Isn't the bolt-on record for the LS1 a high 11?
bolt-on is stock internal read the faq... and besides the fastest 5th gen internally modded list still dont mph as high as the fastest stock internal 4th gen. Lol just because you have not seen it does not mean it has not happened... The proof is in the pudding sir.
Old 09-26-2011, 01:28 PM
  #310  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Dark SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by kinglt-1
bolt-on is stock internal read the faq... and besides the fastest 5th gen internally modded list still dont mph as high as the fastest stock internal 4th gen. Lol just because you have not seen it does not mean it has not happened... The proof is in the pudding sir.
Explain this then.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-raci...nly-times.html
Looks like different pudding.
Old 09-26-2011, 01:29 PM
  #311  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
glennster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BADD SS
I pulled the numbers from this section, timeslips/ boltons. I saw I/h/e cars, most trapping 110-112 with a few 114. A stock 4th gen no mods what so ever traps 108-109 in a six speed. I/h/e they trap 110-113 usually so thats close enough. Your not walking away from a fourth gen stock for stock unless its hurt.....

You cant seem to comprehend that its alot more than a 300 lb weight difference, are you dense?
Your opinion does not make it a fact. Most stock 4th gens with manual are 106 high average MPH, thats just real world and 108-109 is not normal. Mine and my friends 4th's were all in this area with most 104-105 and autos at 100-102. My 5th does right at or over 110 MPH stock in 3rd gear.
I get you don't like 5th's but harping on 400 punds and "they don't MPH on the big end" just proves you are the fanboi.
Old 09-26-2011, 01:33 PM
  #312  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Dark SS
Explain this then.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-raci...nly-times.html
Looks like different pudding.
That means nothing,most of those cars are BONE STOCK. this link I posted is official. It says right in the link:
*Bolt on's ONLY. Stock internals motor, intake to oil pan, stock long block (as it came from GM). LS6/LSx style intake swaps allowed.

Last edited by kinglt-1; 09-26-2011 at 02:46 PM.
Old 09-26-2011, 01:38 PM
  #313  
TECH Regular
 
sweetC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BADD SS
I pulled the numbers from this section, timeslips/ boltons. I saw I/h/e cars, most trapping 110-112 with a few 114. A stock 4th gen no mods what so ever traps 108-109 in a six speed. I/h/e they trap 110-113 usually so thats close enough. Your not walking away from a fourth gen stock for stock unless its hurt.....

You cant seem to comprehend that its alot more than a 300 lb weight difference, are you dense?

That is FUNNY **** man, were the hell do you race at! Stock 4th gens trapping 108-109 I have NEVER seen that happen in real life, more like 105-106! My car traps 112 with headers and a home made intake no tune, my brother still has his 2000 T/A auto, with headers, intake and a tune and there is NO match! My car walks his no problem, nore has ANY 4th gen take me on the street! Keep living in your magic 4th gen world, sorry but the only argument you can make is wieght, the new camaro romps all over the 4th gen in every other way... thats the only reason I got it! Hopfully they do make the car lighter with the new platform, but by that time it will be a new style body and smaller engine as well! Regardless of what the next platform is, the only way I am selling this car is for a ZL1 or Z06 and that wont be for a long time.
Old 09-26-2011, 01:39 PM
  #314  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sweetC5
That is FUNNY **** man, were the hell do you race at! Stock 4th gens trapping 108-109 I have NEVER seen that happen in real life, more like 105-106! My car traps 112 with headers and a home made intake no tune, my brother still has his 2000 T/A auto, with headers, intake and a tune and there is NO match! My car walks his no problem, nore has ANY 4th gen take me on the street! Keep living in your magic 4th gen world, sorry but the only argument you can make is wieght, the new camaro romps all over the 4th gen in every other way... thats the only reason I got it! Hopfully they do make the car lighter with the new platform, but by that time it will be a new style body and smaller engine as well! Regardless of what the next platform is, the only way I am selling this car is for a ZL1 or Z06 and that wont be for a long time.
yea and my car traps 115 with ony bolt-ons/ stock stall, whats your point? your running into some tired *** 4th gens if they are only trapping 106.
Old 09-26-2011, 01:53 PM
  #315  
TECH Regular
 
sweetC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Really, lets see some slips or a vid. What was the DA on that one day and I am sure you have a tune as well. My car would have no problem hitting 115 with a tune and good air. Not taking anything away from your car, because thats pretty good but its not normal! 108-111 more like the norm for a bolt-on ls1 cars and you know it!
Old 09-26-2011, 01:56 PM
  #316  
TECH Regular
 
sweetC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

106 for a stocker is normal, if you think they trap 110 your high! For auto I see 103-104 all the time, you guys keep going of this fast list and thats a small handfull of how many 4th gens get raced every day! All I know is what I have seen at the track, I dont care what a list says!
Old 09-26-2011, 02:07 PM
  #317  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
tripblackls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: lancaster,ca
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Not trying to argue but my 4gen stock w/6speed trapped 108 and bolt ons 116
Old 09-26-2011, 02:36 PM
  #318  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sweetC5
Really, lets see some slips or a vid. What was the DA on that one day and I am sure you have a tune as well. My car would have no problem hitting 115 with a tune and good air. Not taking anything away from your car, because thats pretty good but its not normal! 108-111 more like the norm for a bolt-on ls1 cars and you know it!
da was 500... the booth gave me somebody elses slip, thats why I have no times in sig. I have backed it up with countless 12.5's on the g-tech(street tires). If you dont believe that's fine, Ill get a slip soon enough. Im not saying 5th gens are slow for the love of god lol. My point is they are very close in performance. I have seen plenty of full bolton ls1 m6 cars trap 112-116, does it happen every day no. You have to remember the ls1 4th gens are between 7-12yrs old now. Alot of them on the road are tired. Fwiw I trapped 105 in my 1996 z28 lt1 m6 car on a 90 degree summer day. mods were catback and cai(back in 2000 it had 11k miles). I know it would of trapped 107 in fall air...yes there are plenty of 01-02' ls1 m6 cars trapping 108-109 bone stock. the link dark ss posted has a few in it. The a4's you posted about only trapping 100-102 are most likely 2.73 geared cars. Take a good running bone stock 02' a4 with 3.23 gears and it will go 105-106 all day. Your 5th gen is badass sir, but it dont run any better than a solid running 4th gen.
Old 09-26-2011, 02:46 PM
  #319  
TECH Regular
 
sweetC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Guys we can argue about this **** all day long, in the end arnt we all real camaro guys! Fact is I love 4th gens, I loved both of mine and I love this car too, hell I loved the 3rd gens! They all look mean, they all have potential to be real killers! I dont think there is a camaro I would not want in my garage, some may need more modding then others but the 5th gen is defintily my cup of tea right now, thats the one I really want in my garage! If you really want to fight about camaros then hell, I would rather have a 70 1/2 split bumper with a Pat Musi 555 in it over any of our junk LOL.
Old 09-26-2011, 02:50 PM
  #320  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sweetC5
Guys we can argue about this **** all day long, in the end arnt we all real camaro guys! Fact is I love 4th gens, I loved both of mine and I love this car too, hell I loved the 3rd gens! They all look mean, they all have potential to be real killers! I dont think there is a camaro I would not want in my garage, some may need more modding then others but the 5th gen is defintily my cup of tea right now, thats the one I really want in my garage! If you really want to fight about camaros then hell, I would rather have a 70 1/2 split bumper with a Pat Musi 555 in it over any of our junk LOL.
Exactly!!! I wasnt trying to post like my 4th gen is better because it's not at all. yes I would much rather have an old school BBC camaro.


Quick Reply: 4th Gen vs. 5th Gen profile comparo. *pic*



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:54 AM.