GM Will Promote V6 Camaro, Not the V8 Camaro
#1
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ Hometown: Aberdeen, SD
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GM Will Promote V6 Camaro, Not the V8 Camaro
Just Don't Call is a Muscle Car
Posted by: David Welch on March 19
General Motors, eager to flog its reputation as a green company, has a slight problem. One of its most high-profile new cars will be the Chevrolet Camaro coming out next year. With its muscle car heritage and optional V-8 engine, the Camaro is hardly the statement of green, high-tech modernism that every carmaker is trying to broadcast these days. Ditto for the Dodge Challenger, which Chrysler showed at the New York Auto Show today. Arguably, both cars say that these companies are stuck in the late ’60s and early ’70s.
GM thinks it has a solution. Just don’t call the Camaro a muscle car. Mark LaNeve, GM-North America’s vice president of sales and marketing, says he wants to advertise the car’s sporty ride and handling, bold styling and (get this) its fuel economy when Chevrolet launches the car next year. When equipped with a V-6 engine, the car should get about 28 miles per gallon on the highway, La Neve says. “We won’t position it as a muscle car,” he says. “The mainstream positioning will be fuel economy, design and a V-6.”
That will require a real sales job. But Chevy has no choice. GM’s biggest-selling division has to transcend its roots as a maker of performance cars like the Corvette, big trucks and NASCAR. Otherwise today’s car buyers, now looking more and more for gas sippers, will drive right on by. Today, Chevy buyers say fuel economy is the third qualification on their list for buying a car. A couple years ago it was 8th or 9th, says Brent Dewar, GM-North America Vice President of sales, service and parts. GM is trying to gain some green cred with marketing chops like its “Gas-Friendly, Gas-Free” campaign, which touts GM’s foray into technologies like ethanol-powered engines, hybrids and its research into hydrogen fuel cells. “It’s a marketing challenge when you make a paradigm change,” Dewar says. The same could be said for marketing a fuel-efficient Camaro.
Posted by: David Welch on March 19
General Motors, eager to flog its reputation as a green company, has a slight problem. One of its most high-profile new cars will be the Chevrolet Camaro coming out next year. With its muscle car heritage and optional V-8 engine, the Camaro is hardly the statement of green, high-tech modernism that every carmaker is trying to broadcast these days. Ditto for the Dodge Challenger, which Chrysler showed at the New York Auto Show today. Arguably, both cars say that these companies are stuck in the late ’60s and early ’70s.
GM thinks it has a solution. Just don’t call the Camaro a muscle car. Mark LaNeve, GM-North America’s vice president of sales and marketing, says he wants to advertise the car’s sporty ride and handling, bold styling and (get this) its fuel economy when Chevrolet launches the car next year. When equipped with a V-6 engine, the car should get about 28 miles per gallon on the highway, La Neve says. “We won’t position it as a muscle car,” he says. “The mainstream positioning will be fuel economy, design and a V-6.”
That will require a real sales job. But Chevy has no choice. GM’s biggest-selling division has to transcend its roots as a maker of performance cars like the Corvette, big trucks and NASCAR. Otherwise today’s car buyers, now looking more and more for gas sippers, will drive right on by. Today, Chevy buyers say fuel economy is the third qualification on their list for buying a car. A couple years ago it was 8th or 9th, says Brent Dewar, GM-North America Vice President of sales, service and parts. GM is trying to gain some green cred with marketing chops like its “Gas-Friendly, Gas-Free” campaign, which touts GM’s foray into technologies like ethanol-powered engines, hybrids and its research into hydrogen fuel cells. “It’s a marketing challenge when you make a paradigm change,” Dewar says. The same could be said for marketing a fuel-efficient Camaro.
#3
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This shouldn't be much of a problem...The Camaro was never a true muscle car in the first place. It always has been(until the 4th gens at least) a simple long hood short trunk coupe with economical engines but with a V8 or two as options.
The people who think that Camaros are performance cars exclusively have apparantly forsaken the Camaro's place in GM's lineup. It has been there since the beginning to steal sales from the Mustang and provide the market with an economical coupe that EVERYONE can afford. I hope GM makes the base models $20k or lower...that would spike sales in a good way. If a $20k price tag means having a Turbo Ecotec, then so be it. I need a new Turbo Coupe.
The people who think that Camaros are performance cars exclusively have apparantly forsaken the Camaro's place in GM's lineup. It has been there since the beginning to steal sales from the Mustang and provide the market with an economical coupe that EVERYONE can afford. I hope GM makes the base models $20k or lower...that would spike sales in a good way. If a $20k price tag means having a Turbo Ecotec, then so be it. I need a new Turbo Coupe.
#4
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ Hometown: Aberdeen, SD
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You can call it whatever you want, but it's a muscle car. Nobody here would be interested in it otherwise and it wouldn't be allowed at muscle car shows. The genre is fairly broad other than it's solely RWD and emphasizes acceleration over everything else.
#6
This shouldn't be much of a problem...The Camaro was never a true muscle car in the first place. It always has been(until the 4th gens at least) a simple long hood short trunk coupe with economical engines but with a V8 or two as options.
The people who think that Camaros are performance cars exclusively have apparantly forsaken the Camaro's place in GM's lineup. It has been there since the beginning to steal sales from the Mustang and provide the market with an economical coupe that EVERYONE can afford. I hope GM makes the base models $20k or lower...that would spike sales in a good way. If a $20k price tag means having a Turbo Ecotec, then so be it. I need a new Turbo Coupe.
The people who think that Camaros are performance cars exclusively have apparantly forsaken the Camaro's place in GM's lineup. It has been there since the beginning to steal sales from the Mustang and provide the market with an economical coupe that EVERYONE can afford. I hope GM makes the base models $20k or lower...that would spike sales in a good way. If a $20k price tag means having a Turbo Ecotec, then so be it. I need a new Turbo Coupe.
Trending Topics
#9
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tuscaloosa, AL.
Posts: 1,251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Technically, I believe they refer to it as a "pony car". Regardless, the lines between muscle car and pony car have been blurred over the years, so I think it is safe to call it a muscle car instead of simply arguing about syemantics.
Now when people call a corvette a muscle car, that is over the line. Obviously a sports car due to its 2 seater + great handeling characteristics.
Now when people call a corvette a muscle car, that is over the line. Obviously a sports car due to its 2 seater + great handeling characteristics.
#10
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Simi Valley, CA.
Posts: 2,727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hahaha that is awesome my M6 gets 28-31mpg and outpowers that lil V6. Don't let the public find out. Wonder what the LS3 or LSA/8 will get in fuel economy, like it would matter anyways.
Like was said before if marketing the badboy as a turbo 4cyl. or V6 super gas saver will keep it alive and sell units that fine w/ me as long as we get out big bad SS with a blown engine.
Like was said before if marketing the badboy as a turbo 4cyl. or V6 super gas saver will keep it alive and sell units that fine w/ me as long as we get out big bad SS with a blown engine.
#12
Launching!
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thats not a shocker at all, the base models are the majority that sell anyways.. they are what keeps these cars alive. But in no way, shape or form is the base model a muscle car, but it never has been. The Mustang, Camaro, Firebird, Cuda, Challenger ect.. have always been "Pony Cars" with the V8 trims blending into that "Muscle Car" genre.
#13
On The Tree
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Technically, I believe they refer to it as a "pony car". Regardless, the lines between muscle car and pony car have been blurred over the years, so I think it is safe to call it a muscle car instead of simply arguing about syemantics.
Now when people call a corvette a muscle car, that is over the line. Obviously a sports car due to its 2 seater + great handeling characteristics.
Now when people call a corvette a muscle car, that is over the line. Obviously a sports car due to its 2 seater + great handeling characteristics.
#14
12 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: ILLINOIS
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thats not a shocker at all, the base models are the majority that sell anyways.. they are what keeps these cars alive. But in no way, shape or form is the base model a muscle car, but it never has been. The Mustang, Camaro, Firebird, Cuda, Challenger ect.. have always been "Pony Cars" with the V8 trims blending into that "Muscle Car" genre.
#17
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
If they want to promote the V-6's economy that's fine. We need people to buy those versions to keep the car alive. And the V-6's have never been anywhere close to a muscle car anyway.
It would be cool to see some V-8 versions advertised, but it's probably not necessary. Those pretty much sell themselves. Anyone interested in a V-8 pony/muscle car is already gonna know the Camaro is available with one.
It would be cool to see some V-8 versions advertised, but it's probably not necessary. Those pretty much sell themselves. Anyone interested in a V-8 pony/muscle car is already gonna know the Camaro is available with one.
#19
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Missouri
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A coffe grinder stuck inside a dying elephant, most likely? Like most rice? I'm not really pleased about this whole "Inline Turbo 4" ****. I don't want an import motor in my Muscle. I don't care how GM markets it, as long as we all know what it really is. And what it is IS American Muscle.
#20
14 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (36)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago, Il
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A coffe grinder stuck inside a dying elephant, most likely? Like most rice? I'm not really pleased about this whole "Inline Turbo 4" ****. I don't want an import motor in my Muscle. I don't care how GM markets it, as long as we all know what it really is. And what it is IS American Muscle.