General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

Low end power is gone

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-11-2008, 08:20 PM
  #41  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (39)
 
jrob56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 2,153
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

ive never heard anything like that on this board...you have to have a muffler for low end...i run with my cutout open all the time and there isnt much of a difference with it closed...i would suggest running it at the track and checking the times or find a buddy and gauge off where his car is at or something to see if its all in your head before you go changing exhaust setups again...
Old 11-11-2008, 09:25 PM
  #42  
Teching In
 
383hatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Fort Bragg
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

velocity. Back pressure is a good thing as long as it is not over restricting. Search around and see where people have said that they gained low end power by getting rid of true duals. Its all about finding a balance.
Old 11-13-2008, 12:09 AM
  #43  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
RaggedRides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wilkes-barre
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I noticed you ported the throttle body. Did you grind the bumpstop as well? Go too far and you're going to throw codes. Well, maybe not since your light isn't coming on.


After my header swap my car started running rich as hell and my times never picked up until my last track outing. Perfect prep and weather had more to do with it than anything. I'm only 3 tenths and 1 mph better than when I was stock. Was it tuned before or after the header swap? Your numbers seem fine, so maybe it's all in your head. Take it to the track!

Last edited by RaggedRides; 11-13-2008 at 12:14 AM.
Old 11-13-2008, 03:12 PM
  #44  
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
 
silverM6TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

less back pressure so less low end power
Old 11-14-2008, 01:04 AM
  #45  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Grimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

you want free flowing exhaust that keeps up velocity (primaries not too big), and thus saves low end torque. you do not want "backpressure"
Old 11-14-2008, 07:39 AM
  #46  
TECH Addict
 
SladeX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,379
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I've got a few dyno sheets that prove otherwise that you loose low end torque.

When I did full exhaust I shot up in torque from 325ft/lb to 359ft/lb. That gain wasn't just at peak, it was across the whole torque curve. dyno started at just above 2000rpm. Now I'd be hard pressed to believe that considering the whole torque curve shifted up 20 ft/lb + that below 2000 there could have been more torque before the headers.

What you are feeling is that dramatic change in the torque curve, prior to the headers, my torque curve was FLAT, like 2500 and 4000 were separated <10ft/lb of torque. You don't feel that. With headers in, you now have a sweet spot for torque which if you can keep your eye on the tach will represent itself as a part in the throttle where its climbing, climbing then SPIKING, or at the very least shows itself more than normal. With that in mind, your low end feels like ***.
Old 11-14-2008, 02:57 PM
  #47  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
SOMbitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,881
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SladeX
I've got a few dyno sheets that prove otherwise that you loose low end torque.

When I did full exhaust I shot up in torque from 325ft/lb to 359ft/lb. That gain wasn't just at peak, it was across the whole torque curve. dyno started at just above 2000rpm. Now I'd be hard pressed to believe that considering the whole torque curve shifted up 20 ft/lb + that below 2000 there could have been more torque before the headers.

What you are feeling is that dramatic change in the torque curve, prior to the headers, my torque curve was FLAT, like 2500 and 4000 were separated <10ft/lb of torque. You don't feel that. With headers in, you now have a sweet spot for torque which if you can keep your eye on the tach will represent itself as a part in the throttle where its climbing, climbing then SPIKING, or at the very least shows itself more than normal. With that in mind, your low end feels like ***.
You are right. Backpressure creating torque is a myth. I think I will stick a potato in in one exhaust pipe for some back pressure and lowend torque Right

In oversimplified terms:

Backpressure = negative cylinder pressure = loss of intake scavenging charge = less cylinder fill = less power everywhere.
Old 11-14-2008, 03:22 PM
  #48  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (39)
 
jrob56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 2,153
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SladeX
I've got a few dyno sheets that prove otherwise that you loose low end torque.

When I did full exhaust I shot up in torque from 325ft/lb to 359ft/lb. That gain wasn't just at peak, it was across the whole torque curve. dyno started at just above 2000rpm. Now I'd be hard pressed to believe that considering the whole torque curve shifted up 20 ft/lb + that below 2000 there could have been more torque before the headers.

What you are feeling is that dramatic change in the torque curve, prior to the headers, my torque curve was FLAT, like 2500 and 4000 were separated <10ft/lb of torque. You don't feel that. With headers in, you now have a sweet spot for torque which if you can keep your eye on the tach will represent itself as a part in the throttle where its climbing, climbing then SPIKING, or at the very least shows itself more than normal. With that in mind, your low end feels like ***.
this is the best explanation i have heard for this yet




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:01 PM.