General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

2010 Camaro is HUGE!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-2009, 03:00 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
mcianci's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2010 Camaro is HUGE!

Yesterday I went to the 2010 Camaro debut at the local Chevy dealership (Ben Mynatt GM in Concord, NC) because I had to just touch it. I knew it was big and heavy, but wow. Hopefully the pictures I will upload will go through. Compare my 2002 Camaro Z28 with the new 1SS automatic (boring). Still a cool car though.
Attached Thumbnails 2010 Camaro is HUGE!-dscn0695.jpg   2010 Camaro is HUGE!-dscn0706.jpg   2010 Camaro is HUGE!-dscn0720.jpg   2010 Camaro is HUGE!-dscn0707.jpg  
Old 05-08-2009, 03:08 PM
  #2  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
SStriker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nah - just the front looks big...It looks like it's about the same height and a little shorter on lenght...It deff. looks Fatter..
Old 05-08-2009, 03:19 PM
  #3  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
mcianci's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The front definitely looks (and is, I think) much bigger. The roofline might look the same in the pictures but my relatively stock height 4th gen looks a lot lower if you're there. And the hood is much higher on the new one.
Also, I am more than 6' and I cannot sit in my backseat unless I sit sideways, and I was pretty comfortable in the backseat of the new one (comfortable compared to mine).
Old 05-08-2009, 04:40 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
Lotus289's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Toledo, OH
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Fatter might not be the word I'd use to describe it. I think beefier fits better. It's just got a bigger, broader, more intimidating stance. The 4th gen was designed to be more aerodynamic, sleek, kinda weave in & out of traffic sorta look. The 5th gen just has a sharply edged 'get the f**k outta my way' kinda look. Muy Bueno.
Old 05-08-2009, 07:05 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
WS6 Rampage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The dirty taint of the country. ...Los Angeles
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Anyone know what the 5th gen's curb weight is? ...It looks like it could possibly be tip toeing around 4k like the 5th gen Mustangs.
Old 05-08-2009, 07:24 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
BigDaddyBry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ridgecrest, CA
Posts: 1,897
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by WS6 Rampage
Anyone know what the 5th gen's curb weight is? ...It looks like it could possibly be tip toeing around 4k like the 5th gen Mustangs.
I read on Edmunds:

2009 Mustang GT (Deluxe) = 3356
2010 Camaro 1SS = 3860 (3849 on Chevy's website)
Old 05-08-2009, 07:29 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
WS6 Rampage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The dirty taint of the country. ...Los Angeles
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BigDaddyBry
I read on Edmunds:

2009 Mustang GT (Deluxe) = 3356
2010 Camaro 1SS = 3860
Wow! ... I thought the Mustangs were allot heavier than that. I'm assuming that the GT-500's are much heavier though.

As far as the Camaro, I'm not that surprised. I hope GM is gonna be able to keep them in production though. I'd like to see the evolution of this car over the next few years.
Old 05-08-2009, 07:39 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
BigDaddyBry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ridgecrest, CA
Posts: 1,897
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by WS6 Rampage
Wow! ... I thought the Mustangs were allot heavier than that. I'm assuming that the GT-500's are much heavier though.

As far as the Camaro, I'm not that surprised. I hope GM is gonna be able to keep them in production though. I'd like to see the evolution of this car over the next few years.
Yeah, the GT500s are almost 4k lbs. according to Edmunds. Can't find the weight for either on Ford.com.

There seems to be alot of excitement for the Camaro. I hope it's not too late, they're years late to the party.
Old 05-08-2009, 08:17 PM
  #9  
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
Tyler valo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Knoxville, Tn
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Plus they still have the freaking trademark GM orange peel. I went to my local dealership yesterday and seen a black 2SS and of course it has the trademark paint texture...ugghh!
Old 05-08-2009, 08:51 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (13)
 
qwk93ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Fairfield, Ohio
Posts: 2,240
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

the new camaro needs an aftermarket grill bad!
Old 05-08-2009, 09:57 PM
  #11  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
mcianci's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As for production numbers, I asked a GM guy and he told me GM originally intended on 3500 for the first year but they got like 15000 orders, so that should keep them busy. Still nothing compared to the close to 300000 back in the day.
Old 05-09-2009, 01:35 AM
  #12  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
flintwrench69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mt Morris, Michigan
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Are those wheels on the 10 camaro chrome plastic? They look similar to the challenger wheels & theyre chrome plastic. I saw one in Detroit today & I havent yet acquired a taste for it.
Old 05-09-2009, 10:31 AM
  #13  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
mcianci's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by flintwrench69
Are those wheels on the 10 camaro chrome plastic? They look similar to the challenger wheels & theyre chrome plastic. I saw one in Detroit today & I havent yet acquired a taste for it.
I am pretty sure they are regular rims. You can get some black 18" 'old school' looking ones, 19", 20", or 21". The 19-20" are aluminum I think, either painted or polished or the grayish finish (in the pictures). This is all from the top of my head, I don't have the brochure in front of me.It's funny, the 18" look tiny compared to the 21", which although big, doesn't look that big (not like DUBs).
Old 05-09-2009, 10:39 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
BigDaddyBry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ridgecrest, CA
Posts: 1,897
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by mcianci
As for production numbers, I asked a GM guy and he told me GM originally intended on 3500 for the first year but they got like 15000 orders, so that should keep them busy. Still nothing compared to the close to 300000 back in the day.
That definitely does not sound even remotely accurate, that's for sure.

Given the supply is far greater than the demand, as evidenced by the close to MSRP pricing.
Old 05-14-2009, 05:02 PM
  #15  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
mcianci's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BigDaddyBry
That definitely does not sound even remotely accurate, that's for sure.

Given the supply is far greater than the demand, as evidenced by the close to MSRP pricing.
Hey I am just saying what I have heard. I am actually out of town right now and I stopped at a different Chevy dealer and the guy told me there are actually like 23000 orders and so far GM has built like 5000. Once again, this is what I have heard.
Old 05-14-2009, 05:25 PM
  #16  
Launching!
 
SimRacer1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No suprise here fellas, it just follows the desing trend of the last 5 or so years for all cars, where every car no matter if its a sedan, small import, sports car or whatever, they just keep getting a fatter, broader, beefier, higher, bigger, straighter look.
Old 05-14-2009, 05:32 PM
  #17  
On The Tree
 
duffman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Doughnuts on your lawn!
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Of course its big, it rolls on dubs and still has some good fender gap. Thats the only thing i hate about it and the only thing keeping me from buying it. If its on "dubs" it needs to complete the look and tuck into the fender nicely. But it dosen't, so what if I wanted some lightweight 18s? Then I'd look way more like a damn 4x4 than my stock hieght 4th gen. if it wasnt for that one fact, I can get over the small wieght problem, but for that fact alone im not getting one. Still a nice car though and I cant wait to see one on the road.
Old 05-14-2009, 10:37 PM
  #18  
On The Tree
 
BlackHawk256's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Southeast MO
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Its a little bigger overall, which improves it's looks IMO. I haven't seen the interior in person yet, but I hope it has more room and leg space, which would really make it a better DD.
Old 05-14-2009, 10:40 PM
  #19  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Detoxx03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Woodward Avenue
Posts: 7,336
Received 72 Likes on 37 Posts

Default

I saw a sick black on black on today
Old 05-14-2009, 10:45 PM
  #20  
Moderator
iTrader: (15)
 
JayplaySS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Miami, OH
Posts: 4,616
Received 161 Likes on 99 Posts

Default

I'll be honest, I just saw one yesterday at the dealer and it was smaller than I thought it would be. Still a heavy sob though.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57 AM.