should i use a 160 deg thermostat?
#1
should i use a 160 deg thermostat?
i have a 2002 camaro ss. i just installed long tube headers and an slp powerflow exhaust along with a slp high flow intake. im taking the car to get tunes shortly and was wondering if i should run a 160 deg tstat opposed to the stock? what are the cons of running it? any info is much appreciated
#2
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,604
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Cons: slightly worse efficiency, wasted money, wider
coolant temperature swing for the tune to accommodate.
Because the 'stat sets your minimum coolant temp, not
the max. If you have an overheating problem the 'stat
is not the cause and can't fix it.
Your cooling system will also have a harder time "living
up to" the temp that the 'stat wants to hold. The stock
radiator is the #1 problem, not enough core, and you
want it to work even harder with less air temperature
delta. Ain't gonna work out when summer comes,
especially if it's holding 11 years worth of debris in the
fins (condenser and rad, both excellent chunk-catchers).
coolant temperature swing for the tune to accommodate.
Because the 'stat sets your minimum coolant temp, not
the max. If you have an overheating problem the 'stat
is not the cause and can't fix it.
Your cooling system will also have a harder time "living
up to" the temp that the 'stat wants to hold. The stock
radiator is the #1 problem, not enough core, and you
want it to work even harder with less air temperature
delta. Ain't gonna work out when summer comes,
especially if it's holding 11 years worth of debris in the
fins (condenser and rad, both excellent chunk-catchers).
#3
TECH Fanatic
Cons: slightly worse efficiency, wasted money, wider
coolant temperature swing for the tune to accommodate.
Because the 'stat sets your minimum coolant temp, not
the max. If you have an overheating problem the 'stat
is not the cause and can't fix it.
Your cooling system will also have a harder time "living
up to" the temp that the 'stat wants to hold. The stock
radiator is the #1 problem, not enough core, and you
want it to work even harder with less air temperature
delta. Ain't gonna work out when summer comes,
especially if it's holding 11 years worth of debris in the
fins (condenser and rad, both excellent chunk-catchers).
coolant temperature swing for the tune to accommodate.
Because the 'stat sets your minimum coolant temp, not
the max. If you have an overheating problem the 'stat
is not the cause and can't fix it.
Your cooling system will also have a harder time "living
up to" the temp that the 'stat wants to hold. The stock
radiator is the #1 problem, not enough core, and you
want it to work even harder with less air temperature
delta. Ain't gonna work out when summer comes,
especially if it's holding 11 years worth of debris in the
fins (condenser and rad, both excellent chunk-catchers).
#4
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,257
Likes: 0
Received 1,688 Likes
on
1,209 Posts
I always stick to 180° or stock 187° units for an NA application. Best power seems to be made when coolant temps are in the 190-210° range. What's ideal for best power is a nice warm combustion chamber with a very cool intake air charge.
#5
Pontiacerator
iTrader: (12)
My buddy installed one and my M6 car must have one because they both take quite a bit longer to warm up to operating temp than my A4. It's a bummer on really cold days.
I have noted that his ECT's do stay about 10* lower than mine at the track since he installed it. And my car definitely makes more power at 190-195 ECT than 210-214.
I have noted that his ECT's do stay about 10* lower than mine at the track since he installed it. And my car definitely makes more power at 190-195 ECT than 210-214.
Trending Topics
#9
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,257
Likes: 0
Received 1,688 Likes
on
1,209 Posts
There are two reasons why people usually consider a cooler t-stat, one is to reduce combustion chamber temps to allow for more aggressive timing or compression or boost with less fear of detonation. This is fine, if the trade off in more timing/compression/boost brings enough power to offset the loss of efficiency from running the combustion chamber cooler. The other reason is to prevent intake heat soak and deliver a cooler intake air charge to the engine. The latter makes some sense in applications where intake heat soak is a real problem, but this isn't the case for an LS1.