General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

How reliable are the V6 Camaros/Firebirds?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-24-2006, 03:33 PM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ZeroFear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mars
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question How reliable are the V6 Camaros/Firebirds?

Im thinking about geting this nice 02 V6 Firebird w/50K miles as an everyday car. How well do these motors last? Are they bad for everyday driving? The other option i am looking at is geting a prelude or eclipse, but i think the firebird looks nicer. V6 drivers post your comments. Also does the rwd suck in the snow even with good tires? Sometimes in the winter there is light snow/slush here.
Old 07-24-2006, 03:49 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
 
ohohsilverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Richmond, Texas
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Man my camaro was super reliable and heck of a lot of fun, especially after i put the performance clutch and headers on it. I had a limited slip rear and yes it can slide around at the wrong time but if you know what you are doing and have half a brain it shouldnt be a big deal. Oh yeah, my camaro also got 42 miles to the gallon once on a trip from houston. Most of the time it was in the mid 30's miles per gallon on the highway and about 18 in the city. I sold it with 93k on it and it still ran pretty close to what it did when i got it with 24k on it. Just take care of it and it will take care of you. Hope this helps

Bryan
Old 07-24-2006, 03:52 PM
  #3  
Tech Resident
 
ChocoTaco369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Philly
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

V6 f-bodies are extremely reliable cars. their engines are very durable assuming you maintain them (regular maintenance, oil changes, spark plugs etc...). the automatic f-bodies are especially reliable (unlike V8 f-bodies, it's the manual t-5 that is the weaker transmission in the V6). they have 4L60E's in them. 4L60E's get a bad rap in 400hp V8 cars but in V6's they are tanks. 200hp cars are nothing for a 4L60E. it's a very reliable engine/transmission combo. throw on a lid, cold air intake, exhaust, a shift kit, a 3000 stall, a hood and chrome rims and you got a high 14 second car that'll get 23mpg on regular gas and still looks pretty good while being very reliable.
Old 07-24-2006, 03:54 PM
  #4  
Launching!
 
NoFive0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lakeland, Fl.
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I had a 95 3.4 Camaro that I got when I was 16 and I got rid of it when I was 19. I beat the living dog **** out of that car for a solid 3 years, with the only problem being rust in radiator/new water pump. I took it rallying/off roading, and there was a joke between all of my friends that they were going to make a throttle button that said off/on because that was the only way I knew how to drive (no in between). I doubt anyone has beat on a V6 Camaro in a whole lifetime, like I have in that car. Sadly though, I let a friend drive it to work for a week or two and he brought it back banging on 4 or 5 cylinders...could never find out the problem. And eventually traded it in for a Jeep for like $1500. Damn, I really miss that car now.

Tim.

Edit: I probably got around 15 mpg.
Old 07-24-2006, 03:56 PM
  #5  
Tech Resident
 
ChocoTaco369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Philly
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NoFive0
I had a 95 3.4 Camaro that I got when I was 16 and I got rid of it when I was 19. I beat the living dog **** out of that car for a solid 3 years, with the only problem being rust in radiator/new water pump. I took it rallying/off roading, and there was a joke between all of my friends that they were going to make a throttle button that said off/on because that was the only way I knew how to drive (no in between). I doubt anyone has beat on a V6 Camaro in a whole lifetime, like I have in that car. Sadly though, I let a friend drive it to work for a week or two and he brought it back banging on 4 or 5 cylinders...could never find out the problem. And eventually traded it in for a Jeep for like $1500. Damn, I really miss that car now.

Tim.
in my first post above, i was talking about 3.8L V6 cars. i personally owned a 3.4L for 3 years also. it is absolutely DOGSHIT SLOW but you could lay the hammer down for miles and miles in those bad boys. no 4th gen V6 is an unreliable car (assuming you don't get a lemon and you maintain it well). the 3.4L's are just very slow. the 3.8L's are just regular slow (but they have ample mods out there to get you into the 14's. the 3.4L's have a poor aftermarket and it's difficult to even break into 15's with them )
Old 07-24-2006, 03:57 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (27)
 
lo_jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Anheuser Busch, Houston Texas
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

3800 Series two is a hearty engine. Do regular maintainance and it will go for a couple hundred thousand miles. Not only that but a new one is way less than a thousand dollars. T5 is ok as long as you don't really try to beat on it. Autos are sturdier for the track. 10 bolt - well you already know about those. Everything else the v6s share with the v8 bretheren, for better or worse.

As far as modding them or more in depth questiosn on 3.4s or 3.8s, go here.
Old 07-24-2006, 03:59 PM
  #7  
Tech Resident
 
ChocoTaco369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Philly
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lo_jack
3800 Series two is a hearty engine. Do regular maintainance and it will go for a couple hundred thousand miles. Not only that but a new one is way less than a thousand dollars. T5 is ok as long as you don't really try to beat on it. Autos are sturdier for the track. 10 bolt - well you already know about those. Everything else the v6s share with the v8 bretheren, for better or worse.
you won't break a 10-bolt in a V6. they were a poor choice in a V8 but in a V6 they were a good combo. the 10-bolt/4L60E is a great rear end/tranny choice for the 3.8L. any larger of a rear and you'd suffer BIG parasitic loss. it's just not necessary.
Old 07-24-2006, 04:03 PM
  #8  
Launching!
 
NoFive0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Lakeland, Fl.
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

[QUOTE=ChocoTaco369] i personally owned a 3.4L for 3 years also. it is absolutely DOGSHIT SLOW [QUOTE]

Haha, I'm not arguing with you there.
Old 07-24-2006, 04:03 PM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (27)
 
lo_jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Anheuser Busch, Houston Texas
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
you won't break a 10-bolt in a V6. they were a poor choice in a V8 but in a V6 they were a good combo. the 10-bolt/4L60E is a great rear end/tranny choice for the 3.8L. any larger of a rear and you'd suffer BIG parasitic loss. it's just not necessary.
Stock v6, you are right. But there are people out there that are not stock running double to triple what the 3.8 is supposed to put down, and then the 10 will probably not be the best choice.

The bearings and seals will all go out just the same though.
Old 07-24-2006, 05:32 PM
  #10  
Trunion King
iTrader: (16)
 
bene's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Texan in Colorado
Posts: 4,394
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ZeroFear
Im thinking about geting this nice 02 V6 Firebird w/50K miles as an everyday car. How well do these motors last? Are they bad for everyday driving? The other option i am looking at is geting a prelude or eclipse, but i think the firebird looks nicer.
Well, I own a V6 that has 196,xxx miles and still runs and never did broke down on the road. Is that reliable enough?

Last edited by bene; 07-24-2006 at 05:40 PM.
Old 07-24-2006, 05:35 PM
  #11  
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
davered00ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Plainfield, CT
Posts: 10,520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Great cars
Old 07-24-2006, 05:53 PM
  #12  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,355
Likes: 0
Received 1,787 Likes on 1,275 Posts

Default

The 3800 Series II is an excellent motor. Great MPG for the size (231ci), decent power and torque for what it is, and maintenance is very affordable. Take care of the motor and it should run forever.

I've been very happy with the L36 3.8L in both my Monte and Bonneville. I beleive the F-body verison gets an aluminum intake vs the plastic unit in my W and H bodies. Overall, good motors.
Old 07-24-2006, 06:02 PM
  #13  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (13)
 
brady346's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: a dumpster in TX
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have a 98 V6 M5. It has 136K. 1 clutch, 1 alternator, 1 battery, and a set of plugs and wires. I have beat the absolute dog **** out of this car and it is still the most reliable vehicle I own. I would go anywhere. These are great cars and impossible to tear up. I have been drunk several times and held the car on the limiter for minutes. nuff said?
Old 07-24-2006, 08:18 PM
  #14  
Tech Resident
 
ChocoTaco369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Philly
Posts: 5,117
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lo_jack
Stock v6, you are right. But there are people out there that are not stock running double to triple what the 3.8 is supposed to put down, and then the 10 will probably not be the best choice.

The bearings and seals will all go out just the same though.
well yea, but that's with any car. we're talking stock to light bolt-ons here. i just find it funny that they're the opposite of the V8 cars. the 10-bolt holds up dandily and the automatic is the stronger tranny
Old 07-24-2006, 08:48 PM
  #15  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,355
Likes: 0
Received 1,787 Likes on 1,275 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
the 10-bolt holds up dandily and the automatic is the stronger tranny

The 10-bolts have done fine in my LS1 cars, all the way to the 1.6 60-foot range at full weight. The 4L60Es haven't done me wrong either.

The 10 bolts will live for awhile in an A4 LS1 if you avoid wheel hop.

The 4L60E will survive for a while at bolt-on + cam level if you keep the fluid changed, keep temps under 180 while racing, and reduce race weight. And at stock or bolt-on level, the 4L60E will live a long time if you follow the same steps.

And for those not interested in drag racing, the 4L60E should survive a very long time on the street behind an LS1, unless abused.
Old 07-24-2006, 08:51 PM
  #16  
TECH Enthusiast
 
GXPPOWER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: crossett, Arkansas
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

go for the 3.8 engine. its probly the most reliable engine GM ever made. their are more 200k+ mile 3.8 out on the road than probly any other engine. was also picked by JD and associates as one of the top 10 engines of all times.

the 3.8 was used in alot of cars. my mother has an old buikc something with the first gen 3.8 in it. 250k miles on it and the car still gets 31 mpg. and nothing with the engine has ever went bad.

as far as trans go for the v6 f-bodies. i havent really heard of any going bad if the car was driven properly.
Old 07-24-2006, 09:10 PM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (27)
 
lo_jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Anheuser Busch, Houston Texas
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Fbody = alum intake, sho nuff

Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369
automatic is the stronger tranny
Now that is the truth. t-5 =
Old 07-24-2006, 09:15 PM
  #18  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
Deuce Bigs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: D/FW
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

current car
99 M5 V6 Camaro
160K+ miles regularly get 360-400 (high of 420) miles to the tank (alot of highway miles)
replaced - alternator, starter, 2 power window motors
still on the original clutch and i've beat the f*ck outa it taking it to the track alot in its youth, barely have a second gear from all the power shifting but still have the miracle clutch and can still chirp second when i ram it into gear.

a/c compressor needs to be replaced, maf sensor seems to have died but not really affecting much driving but has erratic idle when first started.

all in all great car and looks good still.
Old 07-24-2006, 09:29 PM
  #19  
On The Tree
iTrader: (20)
 
homegrown TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Elizabethtown, KY
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i had 260 k on my 3.8 and it was still kicking .... strong at that. i went throught 2 trannys .. and said screw it and swapped an ls1 in it. but the V6 is ver strong and reliable engine.
Old 07-24-2006, 09:35 PM
  #20  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
 
Smoke Panther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yup...popular opinion here is that the 3800 is a roach motor..and, for once, that V6 stereotype is true. Only problem I've had was an alternator go out, and the T5.


Quick Reply: How reliable are the V6 Camaros/Firebirds?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 PM.