General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

what was the stock time?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-10-2006, 07:27 PM
  #1  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
staringback05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,695
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default what was the stock time?

what was the stock time on a ls1 m6....like what gm stated?]
and what was the stock times for a new mustang gt?.....having a little arguement with someone...kinda doesnt believe on how a stock fbody will stroke a new stock gt
Old 12-10-2006, 07:31 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Starz T/A 17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

GM stated 13.5 but everyone I know with half a brain and that can somewhat drive do between 13-13.3, some have even gotten into the 12's, new mustangs are 13.5 from the factory but dont know anyone who ran one.
Old 12-10-2006, 07:43 PM
  #3  
Banned
 
BLKWS.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Where did GM state this? Can I find it online somehow?
Old 12-10-2006, 07:47 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
staringback05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,695
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

me to^^^
Old 12-10-2006, 07:57 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Starz T/A 17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Im lookin for it but what is your friend or w/e arguing with? What is he claiming/trying to prove?
Old 12-10-2006, 08:01 PM
  #6  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (7)
 
Ls1CamaroGuy87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bay Area California
Posts: 4,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

musclecarclub.com
Old 12-10-2006, 08:06 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Starz T/A 17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Another thing that I know that is out their that I just cant find is an article where a 98 T/A dynoed more then a 99 Corvette on the same dyno same day, showing that the 305/350 HP difference is not true
Old 12-10-2006, 08:14 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
staringback05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,695
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

he thinks the mustang weighs ALOT less, therefore it can make up the difference.....i just need some other voices, i KNOW my numbers and i have experience....gm over rated the vette and under rated the fbody...that i know....
Old 12-10-2006, 08:36 PM
  #9  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Starz T/A 17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

umm.... I always thought Mustangs weighed more the F bodies, but just get him to race and show him whats up....
Old 12-10-2006, 08:39 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
staringback05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,695
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

thats the thing he doesnt have one....he wants to get one and im trying to convince him not to....but he thinks the fbody is now outdated... its funny im sitting here arguin with him as we speak
Old 12-10-2006, 08:42 PM
  #11  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Starz T/A 17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

hahahaha, thats funny, tell him to get a vette instead of a new stang
Old 12-10-2006, 08:45 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
staringback05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,695
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

then the "money" issue comes into play....he says that a 28k gt is the better deal
Old 12-10-2006, 08:48 PM
  #13  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
~RedLineLs1~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pueblo, Colorado
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Eh...Its his money. If he wants to waste 28k on a GT let him.
Old 12-10-2006, 09:03 PM
  #14  
NKAWTG...N
iTrader: (3)
 
StoleIt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 4,760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If he thinks a stock mustang can wax a stock fbody he is too far gone to save. Just leave him alone in his fantasy world.
Old 12-10-2006, 09:09 PM
  #15  
Banned
 
BLKWS.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The new GT's supposedly weight 3500# or so. My WS6 weighed 3540 with 3/4 tank of gas...
Old 12-10-2006, 09:13 PM
  #16  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Starz T/A 17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,855
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Is that with you in it?
Old 12-11-2006, 12:50 AM
  #17  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
 
'Trust''s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eternity
Posts: 7,975
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

http://www.supercars.net/Comp?source...List=2742-1478

The info on the TA isn't accurate (HP, unavailble ET's) but the info on the GT is pretty good.
Old 12-11-2006, 02:16 AM
  #18  
Banned
 
BLKWS.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,636
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Starz T/A 17
Is that with you in it?

No me out of it. Not bad though, my 88' GT weighed 35XX with me in it (at 185#) and 11 gallons of gas. Granted the TKO500 added some weight and I had subframes, ect. on it too.
Old 12-11-2006, 04:29 PM
  #19  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
staringback05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,695
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Trust
http://www.supercars.net/Comp?source...List=2742-1478

The info on the TA isn't accurate (HP, unavailble ET's) but the info on the GT is pretty good.
i like how my boy comes through for me....




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:01 AM.