General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

Pic of the New Vette ZR1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-2007, 04:06 PM
  #101  
On The Tree
 
85firebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: bay area
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

that emission statement isn't entill like 2016 or something, but it would be good to start on it now lol.
Old 12-30-2007, 04:50 PM
  #102  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Pretyflywiteguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Raleigh
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...zr1_first_look
Old 12-30-2007, 04:53 PM
  #103  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
evilZO6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

pads and rotors are like 10 Grand if its like the ferrari. If i remember correctly.

Why supercharge the regular corvette engine? Why not a supercharged ls7? I think they should have just hit the 800 hp mark for all that hype and that price. I dont know why they chose to downgrade the engine before beginning to upgrade. Kind of like shooting themselves in the foot if you ask me. Its sad becuase nwo no one will respect the Zo6 the way they did before when engine for engine, its still a better car. Procharged Zo6 will kill ANYTHING. Id like to see one run against a veyron. The Veyron is a fat ***, if i C6 Zo6 was supercharged and tuned, doesnt it weigh like 1000 pounds less than a veyron? I mean that would be the obvious choice for me if i were running things.
Old 12-30-2007, 05:18 PM
  #104  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
Gordon0652's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,188
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

8 grand i am thinking!
And there not the best for the road use...
Old 12-30-2007, 05:44 PM
  #105  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Gaunt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: anozirA
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

For those pads and stuff... You pay around 9 grand for the ferrari ones, but you are mainly paying for the name more than anything.

The ZR1 pads and stuff will be closer to a little North of 6k... Which is still a lot.....

And... you can have your naysayers that would rather supercharge their LS7 and stuff... but how often can you get that raw kind of power with a factory warranty
Old 12-30-2007, 05:53 PM
  #106  
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
 
tpduke112's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Jasper, TN/Atlanta, GA
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by evilZO6
pads and rotors are like 10 Grand if its like the ferrari. If i remember correctly.

Why supercharge the regular corvette engine? Why not a supercharged ls7? I think they should have just hit the 800 hp mark for all that hype and that price. I dont know why they chose to downgrade the engine before beginning to upgrade. Kind of like shooting themselves in the foot if you ask me. Its sad becuase nwo no one will respect the Zo6 the way they did before when engine for engine, its still a better car. Procharged Zo6 will kill ANYTHING. Id like to see one run against a veyron. The Veyron is a fat ***, if i C6 Zo6 was supercharged and tuned, doesnt it weigh like 1000 pounds less than a veyron? I mean that would be the obvious choice for me if i were running things.
because they needed the extra thickness of the cylinder walls.
Old 12-30-2007, 06:05 PM
  #107  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
blakern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Kearney, NE
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

According to a 2003 Car and Driver article, on a regular Enzo Ferrari replacing the brake pads costs $6,000, and the carbon-ceramic brake rotors go for $24,000. This must be with labor included, but still damn!!!!!!! Wish I was a Ferrari mechanic.

I still say save some money, get a ZO6 and Procharge it.

Yea I guess the first test run on the new beast had a twin turbo LS7, but it burned to the ground. So they ditched the idea of using the LS7. They were also trying to get 100hp per liter and a 700hp vette was just to wild for GM. Chicken *****!!
Old 12-30-2007, 06:11 PM
  #108  
TECH Fanatic
 
Shooter_Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: MA
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by evilZO6
Why not a supercharged ls7?
If you were to actually read some of these articles, you would read that the LS7 cylinder walls are not thick enough to hold up to the addition of forced induction, so they make the bore a bit smaller which allows them to add FI and more power.
Old 12-30-2007, 07:11 PM
  #109  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
ICEMAN 31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Orlando Florida
Posts: 1,813
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

where did you get these qt times, there has been no track test yet. Hell they just released the final model about 2 - 3 weeks ago.
Old 12-30-2007, 07:31 PM
  #110  
Alt
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
Alt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hampstead, MD
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

And as far as that sledgehammer goes, where is the proof on that vehicle? Where is the video, the anything? I believe it to be a farce.

Side note: ZR-1 looks badass, maybe it will drop the price of the current vettes so I can afford one.
Old 12-30-2007, 08:37 PM
  #111  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (19)
 
BLOODTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Look, I was pointing out that the poster was talking about a C4 that was fast. It's the Sledgehammer, it makes around 1000hp. It has twin turbos. It is not a production car. It's by Callaway.
http://www.fastcoolcars.com/callaway_sledgehammer.htm

As for the qt times, the fastest STOCK C6 Z06 times are 10.98 @129 mph on stock run flats. So imagine 115 more hp, the ZR1 should be significantly quicker.
Old 12-30-2007, 08:56 PM
  #112  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
formuhawk99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by qwk93ta
That is one bad car.....how many will they make?
According to R & T's article, production will be 2K per year max.
Old 12-30-2007, 11:47 PM
  #113  
Teching In
 
bessie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fccs
Technically hes wrong.. I forgot what its called but in the high 80s and early 90s there was a c4 corvette that had like 8-1000hp and had a top speed of 250mph. Look it up it has like oval back it doesn't look like a corvette the back of it looks like a ferrari
This sounds like what you're talking about: 1988 Chevrolet Callaway Sledgehammer Corvette. Definitely interesting, especially with a price tag of $400,000. I'm going to assume that means $400,000 in 1988. Tack on inflation and that's one expensive Corvette.

Some noteworthy stats:
Price: $400,000
Miles Per Gallon: 10/19 mpg
Curb Weight: 3671 lbs
Layout: Front-Engine/RWD
Transmission: 6-Speed Manual
Engine Type: Twin-Turbo V8
Displacement: 5733 cc
Quarter Mile: 10.6 sec @ 127 mph
Horsepower: 880 bhp
Torque: 772 lb-ft
Top Speed: 254.76 mph
Old 12-31-2007, 04:46 AM
  #114  
Alt
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
Alt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hampstead, MD
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Pictures of the engine of the car? Proof that it went 255mph?
Old 12-31-2007, 05:32 AM
  #115  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
waldershrek's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

you mean like this?

https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=832801


Old 12-31-2007, 07:38 AM
  #116  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
blakern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Kearney, NE
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by waldershrek
I thing he means pics of the callaway sledgehammer??
Old 12-31-2007, 07:50 AM
  #117  
Alt
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
Alt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hampstead, MD
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Correct, show me proof that the Callaway Sledgehammer is all that and a bag of chips. I've seen pictures of the outside of the vehicle, nothing of the motor. If it is indeed the fastest corvette out of the box like Callaway marketed it then where is the proof? Has anyone aside from the Callaway team driven the vehicle, I've never seen it mentioned in a Car & Liar magazine or anything else. Personally, I fly a BS flag when that car is mentioned.
Old 12-31-2007, 08:39 AM
  #118  
Teching In
 
bessie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alt
Correct, show me proof that the Callaway Sledgehammer is all that and a bag of chips. I've seen pictures of the outside of the vehicle, nothing of the motor. If it is indeed the fastest corvette out of the box like Callaway marketed it then where is the proof? Has anyone aside from the Callaway team driven the vehicle, I've never seen it mentioned in a Car & Liar magazine or anything else. Personally, I fly a BS flag when that car is mentioned.
Just did an internet search and posted what I found. Seems like there was/is only one known to be in existence. They said it could be reproduced for $400,000 in the link. I'm guessing there was little interest in the vehicle. More of a collectible/novelty tuner car that never caught on.
Old 12-31-2007, 11:34 AM
  #119  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (19)
 
BLOODTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Alt
Correct, show me proof that the Callaway Sledgehammer is all that and a bag of chips. I've seen pictures of the outside of the vehicle, nothing of the motor. If it is indeed the fastest corvette out of the box like Callaway marketed it then where is the proof? Has anyone aside from the Callaway team driven the vehicle, I've never seen it mentioned in a Car & Liar magazine or anything else. Personally, I fly a BS flag when that car is mentioned.
Nobody said it was all that and a bag of chips, just that is has the Highest (fastest) top speed. Read all of this link. It has pictures of the engine bay too. Google search is your friend.
http://www.z06-corvette.com/super/sledgehammer.htm
Old 12-31-2007, 11:42 AM
  #120  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

As for the brakes. According to an article I read in Road and Track, they claim that the brakes should last quite a long time, upwards of 60k miles based on normal driving. Only reason they would need to be replaced sooner is if you were to do track days on long courses with high speed straights.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:46 AM.