Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

New Edelbrock LSx Intake Manifold at SEMA, claiming much more power than FAST

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-2009, 01:45 PM
  #581  
TECH Resident
 
Denali08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tim @ EAD Performance
Fits a truck just fine with plenty of clearance under the cowl. I have some pictures of it installed that I'll be getting up in the next day or two.
Using truck rails?
Old 04-08-2009, 06:10 PM
  #582  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
eviltwin_1987's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Denali08
Using truck rails?
even if it could they would look like trash with the crossover
Old 04-09-2009, 11:45 AM
  #583  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Johnnystock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,675
Received 38 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

So its a truck-only intake??
Old 04-09-2009, 11:01 PM
  #584  
Teching In
 
GUNRDY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Crestview, Fl
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Exotic Performance Plus
Sounds good, thanks for the info. We'll be testing one on this CTS-V either at the end of this week or early next week. http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com...Car.php?car=29 Bob
Without a doubt if it clears on the CTS V I'll be ordering from you guys. staying tuned in...
Old 04-10-2009, 07:29 AM
  #585  
On The Tree
 
LS1 Coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tim @ EAD Performance
I'm assuming you're an engineer from Edelbrock as I was just on the phone yesterday with Dave S. talking about this exact issue, and he talked to engineering and told me the exact same info.

I've gotta say, I'm pretty disappointed that this intake cannot accommodate a stock GM 90mm Throttle body. Almost anyone that will be running this intake will likely already have some sort of 90mm throttle body with the GM 4 bolt pattern on it.
This is certainly a disapointing piece as there are good and bad TB's out there and havent haerd any feadback about edlerbrocks TB's, I will more than likely be using my P&P TB from my setup in the interim till I can possibly afford a 90mm. I am also intersted in what other peices have to moded to work or have to buy to make this work. I have an 04 GTO LS1 in my 48 and the heigth of this intake would be a plus, but the back of the unit looks as though it would have to be shaved in order for it to fit being it looks as though it has a npt fitting (no big deal) and would be extremely close if not hit my firewall, but what about the sensor that plugs into the back of the stock manifold, what is the work around for this? Am I also required to purchase from Edlebrock the throttle cable bracket? Also as a plus I like your idea of making up some brakets for the stock fuel rails to work. One of the nice things about the so called Holey Warrior intake besides the performance advantage was it's ability to be a complete bolton with stock components and not forcing us to add in more expenses to make things work, unforunately it doesn't look like it is going to come to market.

On another note in your testing might it be possible to look at testing this intake with a P&P TB vs the 90mm? Especially true if your actually looking at a cam that is in it's expected opertional range of this manifold.

Last edited by LS1 Coupe; 04-10-2009 at 12:28 PM.
Old 04-10-2009, 07:37 AM
  #586  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

But then if many people using it are boosted...90mm simply isnt needed.
Old 04-10-2009, 10:10 AM
  #587  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
dman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The intake comes with throttle bracket and barb fittings.
Old 04-10-2009, 11:38 AM
  #588  
TECH Resident
 
Johny GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i have a feeling this intake is going to do just what edelbrock says its going to do. They have been around forever, have a good rep, and make quality components. I really look forward to seeing the results come out. I am also curious to see if someone will try their hand at porting this intake manifold. wonder if it can be ported, and if it is what the results are.
Old 04-10-2009, 07:46 PM
  #589  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (10)
 
s/c'd cav's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: phx , az
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS1 Coupe
On another note in your testing might it be possible to look at testing this intake with a P&P TB vs the 90mm? Especially true if your actually looking at a cam that is in it's expected opertional range of this manifold.
this intakes range is 1500 to 7k , whats wrong with that ?

the victor jr is 3500 to 7k
Old 04-11-2009, 06:25 AM
  #590  
On The Tree
 
LS1 Coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My bad about the rpm range, I was thinking the range was more to the 1500-6500 range where most street engines run, Looking at running up above the 6500 range the 90mm would make more sense if this is where you intend to run it. Running the 85MM should give better throttle response & lowerend tourque numbers. I dont believe I will ever run the car at the drag strip at this point, if I do it will only be at a Nostalgia weekend event. I still would like to see what the overall difference would be on a street based machine running a P&P 85 vs 90mm tb.
Old 04-12-2009, 07:21 AM
  #591  
EPP
FormerVendor
iTrader: (22)
 
EPP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by GUNRDY
Without a doubt if it clears on the CTS V I'll be ordering from you guys. staying tuned in...
The V is at our shop, we'll see how if fits in the next several days.
http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com...Car.php?car=29 Bob
Old 04-15-2009, 01:53 AM
  #592  
Teching In
 
GUNRDY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Crestview, Fl
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I got the updates from your V build up. That really blows, what on earth was edelbrock thinking. Great product...way off on the demographic. Let's see doesnt fit any F-body, GTO, Vette, CTS-V. Who the hell do they plan on marketing this thing to?
Old 04-15-2009, 01:57 AM
  #593  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (10)
 
s/c'd cav's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: phx , az
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GUNRDY
I got the updates from your V build up. That really blows, what on earth was edelbrock thinking. Great product...way off on the demographic. Let's see doesnt fit any F-body, GTO, Vette, CTS-V. Who the hell do they plan on marketing this thing to?
motor swap , and truck crowd

i know itll clear my elco , i bet it will fit my goat easy enough , but im gonna play with a vic jr and 4 barrel tb on the goat for now
Old 04-15-2009, 05:55 AM
  #594  
EPP
FormerVendor
iTrader: (22)
 
EPP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by GUNRDY
I got the updates from your V build up. That really blows, what on earth was edelbrock thinking. Great product...way off on the demographic. Let's see doesnt fit any F-body, GTO, Vette, CTS-V. Who the hell do they plan on marketing this thing to?


We tried installing the new sweet looking Edelbrock Pro-Flo XT manifold on Bob's V. It looked like it might fit with his cowl hood, but the manifold is just a little too tall.



This was a far as the hood would shut. The intake looks too cool not to use it. I know it will fit on a C5 or C6 with a little work and a cowl hood, as we have used Sheet metal intakes that are about the same dimensions. Bob



Old 04-15-2009, 06:06 AM
  #595  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
AINT SKEERED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Albany La
Posts: 3,985
Received 350 Likes on 239 Posts

Default

any testing yet to see what the power curve looks like? Will it like a simular cam to a fast or a whole different profile to make it work right?
Old 04-15-2009, 06:09 AM
  #596  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

get that damn thing tested on a blown motor !!!!
Old 04-15-2009, 08:49 AM
  #597  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
dman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

it almost fits under the hood of my fox body stang... i need a 3" cowl hood and i'm good to go.
Attached Thumbnails New Edelbrock LSx Intake Manifold at SEMA, claiming much more power than FAST-lsxintake_oncar-002.jpg  
Old 04-15-2009, 08:50 AM
  #598  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
GIGAPUNK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Trabuco Canyon, CA
Posts: 624
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Where was the cowl on the CTS-v hitting the intake?
If it was that stupid lip above the throttle body mounting surface, you could probably just trim it down?
Old 04-15-2009, 11:54 AM
  #599  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
MelScrilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

this intake is almost pointless since it doesnt fit in an F body or vette. Seeing that those two are by far the biggest application of ls engines.
Old 04-15-2009, 12:00 PM
  #600  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (10)
 
s/c'd cav's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: phx , az
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MelScrilla
this intake is almost pointless since it doesnt fit in an F body or vette. Seeing that those two are by far the biggest application of ls engines.
geee you live in a small world



Quick Reply: New Edelbrock LSx Intake Manifold at SEMA, claiming much more power than FAST



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:31 AM.