Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LS6 vs FAST 90/90 vs Fast 92/92

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-17-2008, 06:26 PM
  #61  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Hi-Po
Thats almost a quote worthy BS line.

Yea, MS3 power comes on quick and doesnt need huge room up top. You REALLY need to learn more about this cam you are installing. You have it 100% backwards.
+1..
Old 12-17-2008, 06:46 PM
  #62  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
phoenix1987's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I need to find out where this guys lives so I can buy his parts for cheap when the motor goes Boom!
Old 12-17-2008, 06:49 PM
  #63  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
SlowFRC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: DC Suburbs
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by phoenix1987
You should of just searched in stead of wasting OUR time.
Fixed it for you.

BTW wow this thread blew up quick.
Old 12-17-2008, 06:59 PM
  #64  
Launching!
 
JJD49's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by drewwrxrogers
I would like to see what each one is going to add on a bone stock LS1....RWHP NUMBERS!!!!...ALso post price next to each one...this is going to help me with some of my research. I know that the more you spend the better..and that it will depend on mods....but id like to compare them closely. THanks
If the motor is bone stock. Either FAST intake will be a big waist of cash
Old 12-17-2008, 07:11 PM
  #65  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (73)
 
'02 WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Damn, your're going w/ an MS3 and DONT want a FAST 90 or 92? I'm running a much smaller Torquer 2 and have already put the $$ aside for a Vengeance Ported 92.

I see your point w/ the whole budget minded thing. Been there for 2 solid years now. But I'm at the point and you will be too, where there is SOOO much left on the table.

You're still stock LS1 mani so 40+hp IS reasonable estimate +/- few hp. So here, for your budget minded self - LS6 $300 for 15ish hp = 20$/hp and unported/ported FAST $850 for 40ish = 21.25$/hp. Even if you want to downplay the FAST's capabilities say $850 for 30ish hp = 28.33/hp. Still going to be worth it.

There's a reason why it's probably the #1 rated aftermarket manifold in the LSx performance community. GET IN LINE DUDE!!
Old 12-17-2008, 07:26 PM
  #66  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
SweetS10V8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JJD49
If the motor is bone stock. Either FAST intake will be a big waist of cash
I disagree. My truck has an LQ9 shortblock, Stock LS2 heads, Stock LS2 cam, Stock LS2 intake, Stock manifolds, basically an iron block LS2.

I picked up 21rwhp on the dyno on a STOCK engine. Same day, same tune, same dyno, never even unstrapped it. Zero changes except for the intake manifold.
Old 12-17-2008, 07:27 PM
  #67  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SweetS10V8
I disagree. My truck has an LQ9 shortblock, Stock LS2 heads, Stock LS2 cam, Stock LS2 intake, Stock manifolds, basically an iron block LS2.

I picked up 21rwhp on the dyno on a STOCK engine. Same day, same tune, same dyno, never even unstrapped it. Zero changes except for the intake manifold.
what intake did you have on it before? ls6?
Old 12-17-2008, 07:29 PM
  #68  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
SweetS10V8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Oh yeah, Stock LS2 intake....imagine that.

EDIT: I thought I forgot when you asked the question, but I guess I did have it in there originally.

Last edited by SweetS10V8; 12-18-2008 at 07:37 AM.
Old 12-17-2008, 07:34 PM
  #69  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SweetS10V8
Oh yeah, Stock LS2 intake....imagine that.
thats believable..

EDIT: haha, my dumbass looked right over it..
Old 12-17-2008, 07:58 PM
  #70  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (45)
 
wht01ws6ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yeah the whole reason for the LS6 was the budget but he said if he was going to buy an LS6 intake, for something that expensive he was going to have to buy it new. Those intakes don't really wear out much you know. lol Choosing an MS3 because of the LSA it has(don't you have lots of LSA choices here?), bottom end power, and using an LS6 intake with that cam vs the FAST=funny thread
Old 12-17-2008, 08:04 PM
  #71  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by wht01ws6ta
Yeah the whole reason for the LS6 was the budget but he said if he was going to buy an LS6 intake, for something that expensive he was going to have to buy it new. Those intakes don't really wear out much you know. lol
good point.. doesnt really matter if it has 10k miles or new in the box, lol.... one might appear more pleasing to the eye, but some sanding and spray paint can take care of that!

it would be dumb to get a new ls6 intake with the prices of the used FASTs being so cheap now..
Old 12-17-2008, 08:15 PM
  #72  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (73)
 
'02 WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I'm surprised a smart *** on here hasn't told him to buy the Street Warrior off Jegs. LMAO
Old 12-17-2008, 08:28 PM
  #73  
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
theguyulove2hate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lake Worth, FL
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SweetS10V8
I disagree. My truck has an LQ9 shortblock, Stock LS2 heads, Stock LS2 cam, Stock LS2 intake, Stock manifolds, basically an iron block LS2.

I picked up 21rwhp on the dyno on a STOCK engine. Same day, same tune, same dyno, never even unstrapped it. Zero changes except for the intake manifold.
bigger cubes
Old 12-17-2008, 08:28 PM
  #74  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by theguyulove2hate
bigger cubes
that is true..
Old 12-17-2008, 11:10 PM
  #75  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
69_YENKO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Angelo, TX
Posts: 1,645
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I just looked over the last 4 pages and damn what a stupid *** read that was. lol

To the Op, I myself will be going H/C soon. Depending on my tax return I would like to go TFS 215's and a custom spec'd cam to match. (please dont flame me because i'll have $1,000 more in my swap for 30-40hp and a way better curve) for me im always thinking about whats being left on the table. I mod my car to race it, and if im racing I like to be winning. I also know the original motor wont last forever so when it goes i'll already have a good top end to complement the extra cubes. im a firm believer in doing it right, doing it once. Im not made of money so when I can afford it im also going to WASTE my $$ on a ported FAST(its a shame to spend all the money on a H/C setup then not let it breath, I think this is the point everyone is trying to get thru to you). BTW, My LS6 is for sell if you want it??? lol
Old 12-18-2008, 01:11 PM
  #76  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
2c5s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Murrieta Ca.
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by drewwrxrogers
Thanks man. Il hit solid 11's wich is my overall goal with this setup no problem. And if I get a lot of **** for losing to a guy with a fast who runs a tenth faster......I'll take the money I saved on the heads and Intake to buy a very nice Spray kit and look back and shake my head.
If you know so much, why are you here?
Old 12-18-2008, 03:54 PM
  #77  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Avaric3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Manalapan, NJ
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by drewwrxrogers
AGAIN!!!!!! I will say for every single person on here that for some reason thinks my choice of saving $800 bucks is a bad one....I know the FAST is better....I realize It will make more power...but not enough to make up for the cost diffrence.
lets compare apples to apples here. if youre gonna give the price of a used ls6 intake, than also give the price of a used fast intake and tb. so the real difference is ~$500 new or used. but than you gotta include the tb that youll most likely want ported for the ls6 intake so figure youre paying ~$450 for 15rwhp more and a better power curve. thats DEF worth it in most peoples books
Old 12-18-2008, 04:44 PM
  #78  
TECH Resident
 
slow ride 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Anaheim Ca.
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TXMaro
If you're going H/C, FAST is going to give a lot more than it would on a stock car, so comparing on a stock car isn't accurate. What you need is comparison between the same modded car with the two intakes. So here it is, compliments of Mr. Pat G. Top line is Mamo ported FAST 90, NW TB and bottom is LS6 w/ P&P stock TB.
Hey do you what cam was being used in this test?
Old 12-18-2008, 05:57 PM
  #79  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (71)
 
lemons12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Winchester, TN
Posts: 11,088
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Avaric3
lets compare apples to apples here. if youre gonna give the price of a used ls6 intake, than also give the price of a used fast intake and tb. so the real difference is ~$500 new or used. but than you gotta include the tb that youll most likely want ported for the ls6 intake so figure youre paying ~$450 for 15rwhp more and a better power curve. thats DEF worth it in most peoples books
hahahaha, i didnt even catch the fact he was comparing new prices to used prices...

that makes his argument even less strong then.. hahahaha
Old 01-01-2009, 02:40 PM
  #80  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
D. STUNTER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by drewwrxrogers
Yes you are correct...the reason is $800 + the cost of the TB to get the full benefit is in no way close to worth the extra 15-18 TYPICAL RWHP...To some it may very well be.
if your going to spend the time and money for an intake swap, why not just put the best of the best in and not have to worry about it later, if you plan on updating the heads, cam etc.

Your going to see better results with the fast hands down. Your gonna get to the point where theres not to much more you can do with your motor without spending lots of $$$.

Im h/c right now with a ls6 intake and stock tb and am at 385 to the wheels. I ordered my ported fast 92/92 from vengeance cause i feel this will be my last "bolt-on" venture for my car so i wanted to make sure i did it the right way and all out.

Anyways point is if any of that made any sense just put in a FAST its guna be a way better choice down the road and give much bigger gains



Quick Reply: LS6 vs FAST 90/90 vs Fast 92/92



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07 PM.