Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Flowmaster Cat-Back...Worthless?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-2011 | 06:50 AM
  #1  
Benjamin Russick's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, VA
Default Flowmaster Cat-Back...Worthless?

So I recently bought another LS1...a 1998 Trans Am. It already has a Flowmaster cat-back installed, so I was looking on performance opinions. I remember reading that they were pretty awful, but to the point where I should replace it? It sounds OK and the tips look decent.

Sell it and buy a Hooker cat-back with quad-tips? Thanks!
Old 01-08-2011 | 07:14 AM
  #2  
davidws6's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 747
Likes: 5
From: Kansas
Default

I had one on my stock ls1. Had it tuned with headers and all the free mods. Made 340 rwhp. After reading that they don't flow good, I took off the L tail pipe and looked inside.
I then made a longer tip for my Oxy/Act torch and cut away at the baffles.

In the end, it is just an open chamber. I did not have it re dynoed but by the seat of the pants, I could feel it come alive above 3500 rpm.

Now it's behind a 402 in my 01, and yes, it's a lil noisy on accell. Though I don't care, the sound is behind me
Old 01-08-2011 | 09:27 AM
  #3  
TXZ28LS1's Avatar
TECH Senior Member

iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,164
Likes: 1
From: Classified
Default

Its really hard to imagine that flowmaster does not perform well being that they have been around for a very long time. Pretty shocking.
Old 01-08-2011 | 10:07 AM
  #4  
BOBS99SS's Avatar
Captain Double Post
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 2
From: Elyria Ohio
Default

Flowmaster is great for mustangs but suck big time for a f body,would you feel any gains by swwaping the flowmaster I doubt it,I didn't feel any change when I put my lm1 on my stock car,but with bigger mods cam,heads,etc I think it would hurt performance,overall they suck sell it and get something else
Old 01-08-2011 | 10:08 AM
  #5  
Titanws6's Avatar
TECH Resident
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
From: Rowlett, TX
Default

They sound pretty decent, I'm sure it sounds and flows better than stock. I would probably put the $$$ into an ls6 intake first and other things that would need replacing....shocks, endlinks, bushings, plugs, wires.....you see where I'm going
Old 01-08-2011 | 10:14 AM
  #6  
Damian's Avatar
LSX Mechanic
iTrader: (89)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,389
Likes: 12
From: Atlanta
Default

They only make +/- 5hp over a stock muffler. The "flow" is not good, but they sound ok with cats.

LOTS better CB options on the market.
Old 01-08-2011 | 10:31 AM
  #7  
Tommyv8's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 646
Likes: 3
From: St. Charles, MO
Default

Flowbastard
Blowmaster
Generally considered to be about the worst-flowing catback that you can get for an F-body, although it does sound good. You could always do what I did and put in a cutout for the track.
Old 01-08-2011 | 10:40 AM
  #8  
SexyTransAm's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 3
From: E-town, KY
Default

its not all flowmasters that blow nuts. just the f body 80 muffler that was not well designed. they sound good on a stock/light modded car and prob not really holding back much power. but start doing intake cam heads then they could hold ya back a good bit and they start to sound worse the more mods ya get into.
Old 01-08-2011 | 10:47 AM
  #9  
antionnelistenbee's Avatar
Teching In

 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Default

I have a 99 camaro and I have longtubes headers with flowmaster and you mean to tell me they are worthless? What's the best sounding mufflers? a nice but not too loud rumble
Old 01-08-2011 | 11:11 AM
  #10  
JRENIGAR's Avatar
10 Second Club

iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 2
From: 72396
Default

magnaflow, hooker, in that order...
Old 01-08-2011 | 11:17 AM
  #11  
*02WS6TURK*'s Avatar
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 1
From: Oregon Grown
Default

Sell it and buy a magnaflow.
Old 01-08-2011 | 11:26 AM
  #12  
thegroup's Avatar
On The Tree

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Archie, MO
Default

Originally Posted by JRENIGAR
magnaflow, hooker, in that order...
magnaflow for sure. Had them on my 2000 z28 before I put true duals on it. They sound even better with long tubes. Not stupid loud in the car and have an awesome sound when u hit throttle. If I get another Camaro that's the exhaust I'm putting back on it
Old 01-08-2011 | 11:26 AM
  #13  
TXZ28LS1's Avatar
TECH Senior Member

iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,164
Likes: 1
From: Classified
Default

Originally Posted by JRENIGAR
magnaflow, hooker, in that order...
I wasnt really happy with my magnaflow man. I know its popular on hear, but for sound wise i didnt really care much for it. My magnaflow didnt get louder as it broke in like some people say.

I would definitely take hooker catback over magnaflow. I would go Duals,Hooker then magnaflow.
Old 01-08-2011 | 11:47 AM
  #14  
vetteboy99's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Memphis, tn
Default

If you want something loud go SLP LM1 no cats.
Old 01-08-2011 | 01:41 PM
  #15  
MikeWS6's Avatar
TECH Addict

 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 2
Default

On a stock/bolt on car you are not going to notice a difference. I would get a set of long tube headers and if you like how the fm sounds keep it. If you want it quiet get a magnaflow, if you want it loud look into a lm1 or lm2.
Old 01-08-2011 | 02:06 PM
  #16  
Benjamin Russick's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Fanatic

iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, VA
Default

Meh. I was driving around today and the Flowmaster seems to have some vbrations and rattles at certain RPMs. I had a DynoMouth on my last LS1 F-body, but that was pretty loud. I think I'll try a Hooker if I replace it...
Old 01-08-2011 | 02:31 PM
  #17  
jsteele90's Avatar
11 Second Club

iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,870
Likes: 2
From: delaware
Default

when my car was bolt-ons only the flowmaster robbed about 12hp and 20 ft/lb of torque on the dyno with the cutout open and closed
Old 01-08-2011 | 04:03 PM
  #18  
SWEET98SS's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,349
Likes: 2
From: Syracuse, NY
Default

Check my sig for numbers thru the cutout and my flowmaster catback.
Old 01-08-2011 | 04:33 PM
  #19  
BruceBufferTA's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
From: Undisclosed fight club underground
Default

If you want good muscle car sound, go w/ Magnaflow. If you want it to sound raspy and like most ricers then go with the LM1 or 2.
Old 01-08-2011 | 05:38 PM
  #20  
MikeWS6's Avatar
TECH Addict

 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,354
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by BruceBufferTA
If you want good muscle car sound, go w/ Magnaflow. If you want it to sound raspy and like most ricers then go with the LM1 or 2.
lm's are not that bad on a stock engine with a catted y. with heads/cam is raspy as hell


Quick Reply: Flowmaster Cat-Back...Worthless?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 AM.