Heads: ported 243's or stage 2.5 5.3 heads
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Savannah, Ga
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Heads: ported 243's or stage 2.5 5.3 heads
I have a 98 Trans am/Stalled3k-A4 and I was wondering about doing heads now. I have a mild cam/lS6 intake and it makes a respectable 345rwhp with bad knock sensors/stock fuel pump "UNTUNED" at the time and since then, i have upgraded the fuel pump and changed the knock sensors and harness. I want heads now and these 806's ain't cutting it. I want 243's/ ported if possible but those Staged 2.5/5.3 liters heads are nice but i don't want a very high compression though. I would like to have some insight on this matter and i would like to know what hp gains I would see. Thank you! Go fast or go home!!!!!!
Last edited by Joes98Blackbird; 01-04-2013 at 12:36 PM. Reason: MORE INFORMATION WAS NEED!!!
#2
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes
on
15 Posts
I am running stage 2.5/5.3 heads and for the money i'm very happy. The compression bump isn't much at all. I believe stock is around 10:1 and i'm around 10:8 with these heads
#3
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Savannah, Ga
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How much power if you don't mind me asking are you making? I know the A4 make less power vs a manual but i wanna get an ideal of how much "that" i could be making. I have a partner with a closer set up towards yours and he made 441rwhp but he did had a fast90/90TB and then got the car retuned and made 462rwhp wow...... I'm trying to make 400 to 415rwhp...
#5
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes
on
15 Posts
OP let me give you my car as an example: My car has been on 2 different dynos (both were Dynojets as well) and it made 405 rwhp on one, and 460 rwhp on the other other. See my point lol Regardless, the car runs strong for what it is, and I have ran with cars making quite a bit more hp than me. Obviously there are better heads out there, but for the money these 5.3 heads are hard to beat IMO
#6
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
Dyno's aren't irrelevant if you get a baseline on the same dyno. Before I made 341 rwhp with bolt-ons...basically a lid, ported TB and full exhaust. After 2.5 ls6 heads, Torquer V3, FAST 92/92, UD pulley I made 461 rwhp on the same dyno at 10.6 compression. So with that combo I gained 120 rwhp and 56 rwtq. I also got a new exhaust by switching to TD's to compliment the new setup.
#7
Banned
iTrader: (3)
Dyno's aren't irrelevant if you get a baseline on the same dyno. Before I made 341 rwhp with bolt-ons...basically a lid, ported TB and full exhaust. After 2.5 ls6 heads, Torquer V3, FAST 92/92, UD pulley I made 461 rwhp on the same dyno at 10.6 compression. So with that combo I gained 120 rwhp and 56 rwtq. I also got a new exhaust by switching to TD's to compliment the new setup.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: dayton ohio
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i have those heads ands in an A4..ran 7.15 or 7.16 in the 8th..car put down 435rwp then replaced 1 3/4 headers with 1 7/8 headers and a 4insh ypipe with a 4inch flowmasters merge..so its around 440 rwhp if dyon numbers is your thing..
honestly im very happy with the heads i have no complaints
honestly im very happy with the heads i have no complaints
#9
Banned
iTrader: (3)
i have those heads ands in an A4..ran 7.15 or 7.16 in the 8th..car put down 435rwp then replaced 1 3/4 headers with 1 7/8 headers and a 4insh ypipe with a 4inch flowmasters merge..so its around 440 rwhp if dyon numbers is your thing..
honestly im very happy with the heads i have no complaints
honestly im very happy with the heads i have no complaints
Do you know the MPH gains? If there were any?
Also when i say dyno numbers are irrelevant, i mean in the sense that it doesn't actually tell you how fast your car is. Its a tuning tool, thats all. Its a great way to tell wether the mods or tuning you did paid off, but doesn't necessarily tell you how fast your car is. Thats what i was attempting to say when i said they are "irrelevant".
#10
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes
on
15 Posts
I remember when I had my Mustang and had a canned tune (had it dynoed) then had a custom dyno tune (had it dynoed on the same dyno) and they were within 2 hp of each other, but guess what??? The car was noticeably faster with the custom tune, and would consistently trap 2 mph better at the track.
Last edited by HCI2000SS; 01-04-2013 at 09:02 PM.
#12
I think you should worry about your MPH gains, not ET. MPH tells the tale. I just actually installed that setup, its loud as **** but i do feel a noticeable difference low end and mid range on the butt dyno
Do you know the MPH gains? If there were any?
Also when i say dyno numbers are irrelevant, i mean in the sense that it doesn't actually tell you how fast your car is. Its a tuning tool, thats all. Its a great way to tell wether the mods or tuning you did paid off, but doesn't necessarily tell you how fast your car is. Thats what i was attempting to say when i said they are "irrelevant".
Do you know the MPH gains? If there were any?
Also when i say dyno numbers are irrelevant, i mean in the sense that it doesn't actually tell you how fast your car is. Its a tuning tool, thats all. Its a great way to tell wether the mods or tuning you did paid off, but doesn't necessarily tell you how fast your car is. Thats what i was attempting to say when i said they are "irrelevant".
That's basically what I did. I ran the track for MPH. Driver's can make ETs all over the place. I ran at the track and was as high as 15 sec and as low as 12 seconds, but MPH was consistent.
Dyno runs are great for tuning, but I never take the numbers posted on this site as gospel. People inflate, dynos inflate and some dynos are conservative.
#13
I have a 98 Trans am/Stalled3k-A4 and I was wondering about doing heads now. I have a mild cam/lS6 intake and it makes a respectable 345rwhp with bad knock sensors/stock fuel pump "UNTUNED" at the time and since then, i have upgraded the fuel pump and changed the knock sensors and harness. I want heads now and these 806's ain't cutting it. I want 243's/ ported if possible but those Staged 2.5/5.3 liters heads are nice but i don't want a very high compression though. I would like to have some insight on this matter and i would like to know what hp gains I would see. Thank you! Go fast or go home!!!!!!
#14
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Amarillo Tx
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do this for me use the search on this forum and search in the dyno section prc 2.5 243' s and then search prc stage 2.5 5.3 heads. I have personally seen an overall average better number from the prc 5.3 heads with many different cams. n/a that is.
Last edited by reeperz28; 01-04-2013 at 10:13 PM.
#15
Like I mentioned before, I don't trust the dyno section. Too many variables with set-ups, conditions, dynos etc..I have seen cam only cars post higher #s with 241s. That doesn't mean we should forgo the heads and just do a cam.
#16
PRC LS6 450RWHP...https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...-450-rwhp.html
Basically the same combo, only 428RWHP https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...ls6-heads.html
5.3 heads with same 228R cam 416RWHP https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...o-results.html
5.3 with 224R 404RWHP https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...-2-5-5-3s.html
I also saw a 5.3 head combo with a little bigger cam that made 450 RWHP
Too many variables in the Dyno section. I will trust Texas Speed on that the LS6 heads make more power.
Basically the same combo, only 428RWHP https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...ls6-heads.html
5.3 heads with same 228R cam 416RWHP https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...o-results.html
5.3 with 224R 404RWHP https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...-2-5-5-3s.html
I also saw a 5.3 head combo with a little bigger cam that made 450 RWHP
Too many variables in the Dyno section. I will trust Texas Speed on that the LS6 heads make more power.
Last edited by badazz81z28; 01-04-2013 at 11:32 PM.
#18
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Savannah, Ga
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks guys for all of your opinions and statements. I really appreciate that very much. I want 243's but then i want them ported and and new everything. I have a buddy of mines that have a set of used 243's but then they are NOT PORTED!!!. I have seen what both 243's and what the stage 2.5/5.3 can do so i might just buy the Texas speed heads and call it a day, at least they comes with everything and all i got to do is bolt them on and go. I wanna do this 'heads thing' one time and this going to be my daily driver. I can't wait to get these heads!!!
Last edited by Joes98Blackbird; 01-05-2013 at 12:36 PM.
#19
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: dayton ohio
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think you should worry about your MPH gains, not ET. MPH tells the tale. I just actually installed that setup, its loud as **** but i do feel a noticeable difference low end and mid range on the butt dyno
Do you know the MPH gains? If there were any?
Also when i say dyno numbers are irrelevant, i mean in the sense that it doesn't actually tell you how fast your car is. Its a tuning tool, thats all. Its a great way to tell wether the mods or tuning you did paid off, but doesn't necessarily tell you how fast your car is. Thats what i was attempting to say when i said they are "irrelevant".
Do you know the MPH gains? If there were any?
Also when i say dyno numbers are irrelevant, i mean in the sense that it doesn't actually tell you how fast your car is. Its a tuning tool, thats all. Its a great way to tell wether the mods or tuning you did paid off, but doesn't necessarily tell you how fast your car is. Thats what i was attempting to say when i said they are "irrelevant".
#20
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Amarillo Tx
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PRC LS6 450RWHP...https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...-450-rwhp.html
Basically the same combo, only 428RWHP https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...ls6-heads.html
5.3 heads with same 228R cam 416RWHP https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...o-results.html
5.3 with 224R 404RWHP https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...-2-5-5-3s.html
I also saw a 5.3 head combo with a little bigger cam that made 450 RWHP
Too many variables in the Dyno section. I will trust Texas Speed on that the LS6 heads make more power.
Basically the same combo, only 428RWHP https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...ls6-heads.html
5.3 heads with same 228R cam 416RWHP https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...o-results.html
5.3 with 224R 404RWHP https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...-2-5-5-3s.html
I also saw a 5.3 head combo with a little bigger cam that made 450 RWHP
Too many variables in the Dyno section. I will trust Texas Speed on that the LS6 heads make more power.
Good point with the 228 cam no doubt the 5.3 heads love a bigger cam.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...0-results.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...ph-inside.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...0-results.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/dynamomet...-pump-gas.html
But my opinion on the op's original question cant go wrong with ported 243's from t.e.a or AI or livernois.
Last edited by reeperz28; 01-06-2013 at 10:25 AM.