Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

FBODY: Is anyone using the Shaved Truck intakes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-2013, 09:10 PM
  #41  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
LPE 403's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,265
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by slt200mph
Some of us don't mind not having wipers....

What part of "if you like to be different phuchin go for it" did you not underpuchinstand...... I'll be happy to explain the big words to you.
Lmfao....I assume you meant me. You know there's a quote function, right?

And yes, please explain in all of your infinite wisdom and perception what you think I meant and while you're at it use small words.....

Last edited by LPE 403; 12-30-2013 at 09:47 PM.
Old 12-31-2013, 12:56 AM
  #42  
TECH Senior Member
 
joecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: So.Cal.
Posts: 6,077
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Unless you're using a towing cam, then it seems to me that the OEM truck intake won't be matched your cam.
Old 12-31-2013, 08:32 AM
  #43  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,357
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Being different is cute, but making power with a combo is much more satisfying unless you are building a parking lot hood pop queen.
Old 12-31-2013, 10:57 AM
  #44  
TECH Enthusiast
 
jlcustomz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: jacksonville,fl
Posts: 609
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

I followed the lsxrt intake when it came out,it's basically a long crossrunner intake under a big plastic breadbox. Does improve power the whole way up, due to less compromised internal design.
I think the truck intakes could be a good street intake if properly ported, but still subpar to the lsxrt. But even the lsxrt benefits from porting. Nylon casting is far from a perfect process.

Anyone hear anything more about the NRE x-ram yet, which is still in development??https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...-manifold.html

I still have plans to one year, massive time permitted, finish my project of a cross ram dual plenum polished aluminum intake, which will connect to a nylon base. Different can be good.
Old 07-22-2014, 03:35 AM
  #45  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
 
wannaB tuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: wis
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-in...63-75-mph.html
I know this is a really old post... Just wanted everyone who talked negative about the truck intake to see what it can do. Its not just for trailer pulling trucks... Lmao
Old 07-22-2014, 08:41 AM
  #46  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,357
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Forced induction and N/A are completely different, but I would still be curious what that car would do with a good intake.
Old 07-23-2014, 10:12 AM
  #47  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 70 Posts

Default

I almost forgot about this gem of a thread. Keep on keeping on fellas
Old 07-23-2014, 11:35 AM
  #48  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (21)
 
Kingc8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,557
Received 50 Likes on 41 Posts

Default

The only good thing posted in this thread was the FAST LSXRT lol
Old 10-18-2014, 11:35 AM
  #49  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

So how would the truck intake work with some boost behind it?
Old 10-18-2014, 11:54 AM
  #50  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
 
wannaB tuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: wis
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Read post #45 above
Old 10-19-2014, 09:17 AM
  #51  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

I measured last night, and I have about 8.75" from the valley cover, to the bottom of the cowl, and a friend measured the back of the shaved truck intake and measured 9.25-9.5". So I would need to massage the cowl, and drop the k-member 0.5" to get it to work.
Old 10-19-2014, 05:09 PM
  #52  
TECH Enthusiast
 
jlcustomz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: jacksonville,fl
Posts: 609
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Just to mention, for anyone willing to chop up their cowl to fit an LSXrt intake, you may be able to retrofit 2 individual wiper motors from a panel truck supply company.
Couldn't say for sure though, since all I have right now is a roomy G-body compartment to play with.
Old 10-21-2014, 08:10 AM
  #53  
Staging Lane
 
LS1nut346's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They're a cheaper option than a FAST but I just think they're fugly.
Old 05-02-2015, 02:09 PM
  #54  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
Isolde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Smithfield, UT
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Doesn't matter how old the thread is, as long as anyone can benefit from it. New R&D is better added to an old thread than a new one, from the scientific perspective, anyway.
I shaved an '01 truck intake for my '86 Camaro, that worked fine. It doesn't faceplant at 4000, 5000, nor 5800 RPM. It peaks at 6300, same as the LS1 intake. Fine by me.
LS1 intakes are now over $200, without the rails, so if I can save $200 by doing under $20-worth of mods, I will.
Unshaved, it is ugly. But it's free when you buy the engine used. And if you count your time as free, which some folks have a low opinion of, then it has merit.
Plus it is a good way to show off skills.
As I'm starting to swap one of my '01 4.8s into my '94 Camaro, with a custom oilpan ( again, to save $ ) and keeping the 3.4 crossmember, this seems like the perfect place for trying to keep a shaved truck intake.
I didn't make my first shave job pretty, yet, but now I have 2 intakes needing pretty shaves.
I always thought a TPI could fit, using Accel's lower intake, and I missed that window. Lucky, though I didn't think so back then. But this window looks like it will stay open for many more years.
So the guy with the red Camaro in his sig can pipe down and enjoy the thread, or just keep his snide remarks to himself. The rest of us don't own money trees, and we have other expenses for what money we earn. He isn't helping.
The following users liked this post:
Jayco500 (04-11-2021)
Old 05-02-2015, 02:11 PM
  #55  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
Isolde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Smithfield, UT
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
I measured last night, and I have about 8.75" from the valley cover, to the bottom of the cowl, and a friend measured the back of the shaved truck intake and measured 9.25-9.5". So I would need to massage the cowl, and drop the k-member 0.5" to get it to work.
Good info, thank you!
Old 05-02-2015, 03:14 PM
  #56  
Staging Lane
 
scout2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 85
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

+1

I have shaved mine, and it looks great. It isn't isn't painted yet, so I'm not going to post a picture yet.

It may be off topic for this thread though, its not in an F-body, not even a GM car.

Good thread.


Originally Posted by Isolde
Doesn't matter how old the thread is, as long as anyone can benefit from it. New R&D is better added to an old thread than a new one, from the scientific perspective, anyway.
I shaved an '01 truck intake for my '86 Camaro, that worked fine. It doesn't faceplant at 4000, 5000, nor 5800 RPM. It peaks at 6300, same as the LS1 intake. Fine by me.
LS1 intakes are now over $200, without the rails, so if I can save $200 by doing under $20-worth of mods, I will.
Unshaved, it is ugly. But it's free when you buy the engine used. And if you count your time as free, which some folks have a low opinion of, then it has merit.
Plus it is a good way to show off skills.
As I'm starting to swap one of my '01 4.8s into my '94 Camaro, with a custom oilpan ( again, to save $ ) and keeping the 3.4 crossmember, this seems like the perfect place for trying to keep a shaved truck intake.
I didn't make my first shave job pretty, yet, but now I have 2 intakes needing pretty shaves.
I always thought a TPI could fit, using Accel's lower intake, and I missed that window. Lucky, though I didn't think so back then. But this window looks like it will stay open for many more years.
So the guy with the red Camaro in his sig can pipe down and enjoy the thread, or just keep his snide remarks to himself. The rest of us don't own money trees, and we have other expenses for what money we earn. He isn't helping.
Old 06-03-2015, 07:47 AM
  #57  
TECH Regular
 
mikesimpalass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 403
Received 17 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

I should have some dyno numbers soon on a h/c 6.0 with the truck intake. Ill try and get a graph to post as well.
Old 08-10-2015, 08:22 PM
  #58  
Teching In
 
G_rog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Pearland, TX
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well opinions aside, this was an interesting read (especially since I'm building a near identical 6.0): http://www.hotrod.com/features/1507-20-ls1-intake-manifolds-tested/

They tested 20 different LS intakes on a built 6.0. Long story short, the TBSS intake put up impressive numbers. REALLY impressive numbers (better than all the aftermarket besides fast 102). The stock truck manifold was also called ugly (all of you haters may now laugh).

Just food for thought. Thought I'd try to bring actual informative matter into this "gem of a thread" haha.

Last edited by G_rog; 08-10-2015 at 08:30 PM.
Old 08-11-2015, 08:26 AM
  #59  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Very interested to see how you make out.
Old 08-11-2015, 10:37 PM
  #60  
Teching In
 
G_rog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Pearland, TX
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
I measured last night, and I have about 8.75" from the valley cover, to the bottom of the cowl, and a friend measured the back of the shaved truck intake and measured 9.25-9.5". So I would need to massage the cowl, and drop the k-member 0.5" to get it to work.

What k member, motor mounts (worn down stock, poly, solid, etc.), and engine are you running. I have both the TBSS and truck intake manifold laying around. I measured the TBSS intake laying on the ground (with no gasket). From the ground up to the structural rib (bracing for plenum) it was 9.25". If you shaved it flat, it looks to be 8.94". I will be creating a build thread in the near future documenting what it takes to make the TBSS intake fit AND retain windshield wipers. We'll see what happens.


Quick Reply: FBODY: Is anyone using the Shaved Truck intakes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28 PM.