Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

FBODY: Is anyone using the Shaved Truck intakes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 30, 2013 | 09:10 PM
  #41  
LPE 403's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by slt200mph
Some of us don't mind not having wipers....

What part of "if you like to be different phuchin go for it" did you not underpuchinstand...... I'll be happy to explain the big words to you.
Lmfao....I assume you meant me. You know there's a quote function, right?

And yes, please explain in all of your infinite wisdom and perception what you think I meant and while you're at it use small words.....

Last edited by LPE 403; Dec 30, 2013 at 09:47 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2013 | 12:56 AM
  #42  
joecar's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,080
Likes: 17
From: So.Cal.
Default

Unless you're using a towing cam, then it seems to me that the OEM truck intake won't be matched your cam.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2013 | 08:32 AM
  #43  
thunderstruck507's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,358
Likes: 27
From: Northwest AR
Default

Being different is cute, but making power with a combo is much more satisfying unless you are building a parking lot hood pop queen.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2013 | 10:57 AM
  #44  
jlcustomz's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 609
Likes: 6
From: jacksonville,fl
Default

I followed the lsxrt intake when it came out,it's basically a long crossrunner intake under a big plastic breadbox. Does improve power the whole way up, due to less compromised internal design.
I think the truck intakes could be a good street intake if properly ported, but still subpar to the lsxrt. But even the lsxrt benefits from porting. Nylon casting is far from a perfect process.

Anyone hear anything more about the NRE x-ram yet, which is still in development??https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...-manifold.html

I still have plans to one year, massive time permitted, finish my project of a cross ram dual plenum polished aluminum intake, which will connect to a nylon base. Different can be good.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2014 | 03:35 AM
  #45  
wannaB tuner's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: wis
Default

https://ls1tech.com/forums/forced-in...63-75-mph.html
I know this is a really old post... Just wanted everyone who talked negative about the truck intake to see what it can do. Its not just for trailer pulling trucks... Lmao
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2014 | 08:41 AM
  #46  
thunderstruck507's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,358
Likes: 27
From: Northwest AR
Default

Forced induction and N/A are completely different, but I would still be curious what that car would do with a good intake.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2014 | 10:12 AM
  #47  
01ssreda4's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (96)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 89
From: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Default

I almost forgot about this gem of a thread. Keep on keeping on fellas
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2014 | 11:35 AM
  #48  
Kingc8r's Avatar
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,565
Likes: 59
From: SF Bay Area
Default

The only good thing posted in this thread was the FAST LSXRT lol
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2014 | 11:35 AM
  #49  
The Alchemist's Avatar
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,813
Likes: 15
From: Doylestown PA
Default

So how would the truck intake work with some boost behind it?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2014 | 11:54 AM
  #50  
wannaB tuner's Avatar
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: wis
Default

Read post #45 above
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2014 | 09:17 AM
  #51  
The Alchemist's Avatar
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,813
Likes: 15
From: Doylestown PA
Default

I measured last night, and I have about 8.75" from the valley cover, to the bottom of the cowl, and a friend measured the back of the shaved truck intake and measured 9.25-9.5". So I would need to massage the cowl, and drop the k-member 0.5" to get it to work.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2014 | 05:09 PM
  #52  
jlcustomz's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 609
Likes: 6
From: jacksonville,fl
Default

Just to mention, for anyone willing to chop up their cowl to fit an LSXrt intake, you may be able to retrofit 2 individual wiper motors from a panel truck supply company.
Couldn't say for sure though, since all I have right now is a roomy G-body compartment to play with.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2014 | 08:10 AM
  #53  
LS1nut346's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Default

They're a cheaper option than a FAST but I just think they're fugly.
Reply
Old May 2, 2015 | 02:09 PM
  #54  
Isolde's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 648
Likes: 1
From: Smithfield, UT
Default

Doesn't matter how old the thread is, as long as anyone can benefit from it. New R&D is better added to an old thread than a new one, from the scientific perspective, anyway.
I shaved an '01 truck intake for my '86 Camaro, that worked fine. It doesn't faceplant at 4000, 5000, nor 5800 RPM. It peaks at 6300, same as the LS1 intake. Fine by me.
LS1 intakes are now over $200, without the rails, so if I can save $200 by doing under $20-worth of mods, I will.
Unshaved, it is ugly. But it's free when you buy the engine used. And if you count your time as free, which some folks have a low opinion of, then it has merit.
Plus it is a good way to show off skills.
As I'm starting to swap one of my '01 4.8s into my '94 Camaro, with a custom oilpan ( again, to save $ ) and keeping the 3.4 crossmember, this seems like the perfect place for trying to keep a shaved truck intake.
I didn't make my first shave job pretty, yet, but now I have 2 intakes needing pretty shaves.
I always thought a TPI could fit, using Accel's lower intake, and I missed that window. Lucky, though I didn't think so back then. But this window looks like it will stay open for many more years.
So the guy with the red Camaro in his sig can pipe down and enjoy the thread, or just keep his snide remarks to himself. The rest of us don't own money trees, and we have other expenses for what money we earn. He isn't helping.
Reply
Old May 2, 2015 | 02:11 PM
  #55  
Isolde's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 648
Likes: 1
From: Smithfield, UT
Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
I measured last night, and I have about 8.75" from the valley cover, to the bottom of the cowl, and a friend measured the back of the shaved truck intake and measured 9.25-9.5". So I would need to massage the cowl, and drop the k-member 0.5" to get it to work.
Good info, thank you!
Reply
Old May 2, 2015 | 03:14 PM
  #56  
scout2000's Avatar
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 85
Likes: 1
Default

+1

I have shaved mine, and it looks great. It isn't isn't painted yet, so I'm not going to post a picture yet.

It may be off topic for this thread though, its not in an F-body, not even a GM car.

Good thread.


Originally Posted by Isolde
Doesn't matter how old the thread is, as long as anyone can benefit from it. New R&D is better added to an old thread than a new one, from the scientific perspective, anyway.
I shaved an '01 truck intake for my '86 Camaro, that worked fine. It doesn't faceplant at 4000, 5000, nor 5800 RPM. It peaks at 6300, same as the LS1 intake. Fine by me.
LS1 intakes are now over $200, without the rails, so if I can save $200 by doing under $20-worth of mods, I will.
Unshaved, it is ugly. But it's free when you buy the engine used. And if you count your time as free, which some folks have a low opinion of, then it has merit.
Plus it is a good way to show off skills.
As I'm starting to swap one of my '01 4.8s into my '94 Camaro, with a custom oilpan ( again, to save $ ) and keeping the 3.4 crossmember, this seems like the perfect place for trying to keep a shaved truck intake.
I didn't make my first shave job pretty, yet, but now I have 2 intakes needing pretty shaves.
I always thought a TPI could fit, using Accel's lower intake, and I missed that window. Lucky, though I didn't think so back then. But this window looks like it will stay open for many more years.
So the guy with the red Camaro in his sig can pipe down and enjoy the thread, or just keep his snide remarks to himself. The rest of us don't own money trees, and we have other expenses for what money we earn. He isn't helping.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2015 | 07:47 AM
  #57  
mikesimpalass's Avatar
TECH Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 403
Likes: 17
Default

I should have some dyno numbers soon on a h/c 6.0 with the truck intake. Ill try and get a graph to post as well.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2015 | 08:22 PM
  #58  
G_rog's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Pearland, TX
Default

Well opinions aside, this was an interesting read (especially since I'm building a near identical 6.0): http://www.hotrod.com/features/1507-20-ls1-intake-manifolds-tested/

They tested 20 different LS intakes on a built 6.0. Long story short, the TBSS intake put up impressive numbers. REALLY impressive numbers (better than all the aftermarket besides fast 102). The stock truck manifold was also called ugly (all of you haters may now laugh).

Just food for thought. Thought I'd try to bring actual informative matter into this "gem of a thread" haha.

Last edited by G_rog; Aug 10, 2015 at 08:30 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2015 | 08:26 AM
  #59  
The Alchemist's Avatar
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 10,813
Likes: 15
From: Doylestown PA
Default

Very interested to see how you make out.
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2015 | 10:37 PM
  #60  
G_rog's Avatar
Teching In
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Pearland, TX
Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
I measured last night, and I have about 8.75" from the valley cover, to the bottom of the cowl, and a friend measured the back of the shaved truck intake and measured 9.25-9.5". So I would need to massage the cowl, and drop the k-member 0.5" to get it to work.

What k member, motor mounts (worn down stock, poly, solid, etc.), and engine are you running. I have both the TBSS and truck intake manifold laying around. I measured the TBSS intake laying on the ground (with no gasket). From the ground up to the structural rib (bracing for plenum) it was 9.25". If you shaved it flat, it looks to be 8.94". I will be creating a build thread in the near future documenting what it takes to make the TBSS intake fit AND retain windshield wipers. We'll see what happens.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 PM.