Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

FAST 102 vs. LS6?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-01-2014, 07:36 AM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
dsadsdaiouser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default FAST 102 vs. LS6?

How much more rwhp can you see from a FAST 102 (and supporting TB) over the stock LS6 intake? I'm trying to decide if the swap is worth it. We have a 2004 C5 with bolt-ons and an IHRA Pure Stock cam (factory lift AND duration) that makes 372 to the wheels. In good air it will run 11.50s. Currently we also have a wet kit and on a 100 jet (with the NANO also) it made 502. Once we sort it out and get the progressive controller adjusted our hope is to go 10.50s.

Our next step is to have Phil at AI do a set of 243 heads and add a Tick Stage III SNS cam in hopes of going solidly in the 9s. My question is while everything is apart how much can you expect to see from just the FAST 102 intake and TB? I ask because it's going to be about $1500 to do the intake, TB and new 102 nitrous plate. If we're only going to see minimal gains at the wheels I'll just leave the LS6 intake on. I don't mind spending the money but want to make sure it's worth it before we go that direction. Keep in mind that we only have 100 jets in now and can easily go 150 for free but I want to know if the stock intake at some point is going to become too restrictive.

Any real world experience with this?

Thanks.

Scott
Old 07-01-2014, 07:40 AM
  #2  
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
Mgg4591's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 148
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...take-swap.html

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...e-vs-fast.html
Old 07-01-2014, 08:26 AM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
dsadsdaiouser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks. Even on a H/C car it doesn't seem like 20 rwhp would be worth that much money.

Scott
Old 07-01-2014, 09:25 AM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Only you can determine if the bang is worth the buck
Old 07-01-2014, 09:34 AM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

The price is not worth the power gain in my opinion, but I'm not a wealthy man. If you are, then by all means go for it. Or, since you're already on the bottle, just up the shot.
Old 07-01-2014, 09:38 AM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

I like Phoenix's idea actually lol. That's what I'd do...and have actually
Old 07-01-2014, 10:02 AM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HCI2000SS
I like Phoenix's idea actually lol. That's what I'd do...and have actually
Larger jets are waaay cheaper than anything branded FAST.
Old 07-01-2014, 01:59 PM
  #8  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
dsadsdaiouser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks gentlemen. Those were my thoughts originally but I wanted to hear from others. I'll just stick with the LS6 intake when I do my H/C and jet up the plate if I need to go quicker. 9s were our goal and I think that is realistic with the OEM intake.

Scott
Old 07-01-2014, 03:38 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Rise of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Posts: 9,728
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tar Heel
Thanks gentlemen. Those were my thoughts originally but I wanted to hear from others. I'll just stick with the LS6 intake when I do my H/C and jet up the plate if I need to go quicker. 9s were our goal and I think that is realistic with the OEM intake.

Scott
Yeah, I agree. I think that's the smart thing to do. You can always upgrade the intake after doing the heads/cam swap.
Old 07-01-2014, 03:59 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
 
garygnu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,446
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

consider a bbk intake ,used $300 .it will make a little more power ,and safer with the nos .
Old 07-03-2014, 10:20 PM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
Always2Slow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Fast 92mm is really worth doing if you can afford that. Properly ported you will gain throughout your powerband while racing.
Old 07-04-2014, 05:27 PM
  #12  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
BrntWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Land of the FOID
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Its not much for the money you throw at it....but the gains are from ~4k rpms all the way to
Redline. They are a pain to tune right....mine still runs rough with the A/C on.
Old 07-07-2014, 02:01 PM
  #13  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

We prefer the Fast 92 intakes in this application.
Old 07-08-2014, 06:37 AM
  #14  
The Scammer Hammer
iTrader: (49)
 
dr_whigham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 6,708
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Tar Heel
Thanks. Even on a H/C car it doesn't seem like 20 rwhp would be worth that much money.

Scott
Hmmmm.... That could be the difference between a 440 car and a 460 car. I'd go Fast 92 and not even give it a second thought.
Old 07-08-2014, 06:50 AM
  #15  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Belmont, MA
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Or, since you're already on the bottle, just up the shot.
Larger jets are waaay cheaper than anything branded FAST.
On a nitrous setup yes that may be true. But on a purely N/A car you're going to have a tough time getting more hp/$ ratio at that point.

Even on a H/C car it doesn't seem like 20 rwhp would be worth that much money.
$300 for 20rwhp at this point is as good as you'll get without going with more nitrous or boost.
Old 07-08-2014, 07:51 AM
  #16  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,936
Received 426 Likes on 337 Posts

Default

The fasts are worth it. To be honest if you can fit a lsx rt on your car you would be looking closer to 30hp. When I changed from a ls6 to a fast 90 I pick up 13hp at peak and near 18 at other places under the curve. I noticed better throttle response and it seemed to carry the power better.
Old 07-11-2014, 12:40 PM
  #17  
Teching In
iTrader: (5)
 
35thredz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Port your ls6 intake and don't fall into the Fast nut swinger crowd! A tpis ls6 will do just as good if not better on a street car.... unless your turning 7000rpm between red lights!!
Old 07-11-2014, 02:08 PM
  #18  
The Scammer Hammer
iTrader: (49)
 
dr_whigham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 6,708
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 35thredz
Port your ls6 intake and don't fall into the Fast nut swinger crowd! A tpis ls6 will do just as good if not better on a street car.... unless your turning 7000rpm between red lights!!
Right. Because we're atomizing fuel and the size of the TB, not the design of the manifolds runners matter, right?

Your statement is 100% false and it's been said 300 times on here by anyone with decent knowledge that there's nothing to be had by porting an LS6 or changing the size of the TB.

You gain power EVERYWHERE with a Fast, not just peak.
The following users liked this post:
Satterly2164 (07-14-2021)
Old 07-11-2014, 02:13 PM
  #19  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,936
Received 426 Likes on 337 Posts

Default

Actually there is some to be gained by porting a ls6. Maybe 5-6 hp from my experience. The problem is I gained 13-14 over the ported ls6 with the ported fast.

But then I am turning near 7000rpm. The lsx rt is the way to go if you can make it fit.
Old 07-11-2014, 03:03 PM
  #20  
The Scammer Hammer
iTrader: (49)
 
dr_whigham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 6,708
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
Actually there is some to be gained by porting a ls6. Maybe 5-6 hp from my experience. The problem is I gained 13-14 over the ported ls6 with the ported fast. But then I am turning near 7000rpm. The lsx rt is the way to go if you can make it fit.
I agree with the RT. If I could fit it, it'd be in the car, and I'd be damn proud of it too!

Hio you're the exception to the rule. Your car does things others just don't

That's a compliment, btw


Quick Reply: FAST 102 vs. LS6?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 PM.