Gen III DBW Differences?
I have a DBC 5.3 that I’m going to be swapping in to a K5 Blazer and was thinking about converting it to DBW since I’ll be doing a cam swap along with a set of milled 243 heads and a TBSS intake. The intake I picked up came with the DBW throttle body and I can get a new harness made for either setup for a little more than buying a NW TB by itself. The only issue I’m seeing is adapting the newer Gen IV 6 pin TB to the older Gen III 8 pin TB. I know Speartech sells an adapter harness for only $60 but they only list the 01-02 trucks as being compatible and I’ve also seen the X-Link that goes for $235 but they only list the 03-06 trucks as being compatible. I’ve also talked to BP Automotive who will most likely be making my harness and they said they can build in an adapter but only for the 01-02 setups with the all plastic TAC module which leads to my question, what are the differences between the two? Is one better for some reason or just easier to wire and program? I’ve tried looking up the pinouts and wiring diagrams and it looks like they’re the same for all the 01-06 trucks so I’m guessing there’s something different in the TAC module itself?
I already picked up a pedal, harness, and TAC module from each version since the pull-a-part yard didn’t know what they had and sold them to me for $10/setup. One is from an 01 Suburban with the all plastic TAC module and the other is from an 03 Tahoe with the metal and plastic TAC module. Just wondering which would be the better choice so I can sell the other and put that money back in the build budget. What do you guys think?
Not sure why they changed them. And I don't see any issues with either.
I'm not sure which will work with the TBSS TB. What year is that?. You're ALWAYS better off using a pedal, TAC, TB, harness and ecu from the same vehicle.
One consideration is that the 01-02 work with the 411 ECU which is widely supported.
Not sure why they changed them. And I don't see any issues with either.
I'm not sure which will work with the TBSS TB. What year is that?. You're ALWAYS better off using a pedal, TAC, TB, harness and ecu from the same vehicle.
One consideration is that the 01-02 work with the 411 ECU which is widely supported.
My TBSS intake is from an 06-08 which is a Gen IV with a different connector but lots of guys have done the same intake swap on their trucks over at performancetrucks.com since they flow like an LS6 but have longer runners to keep bottom end torque and mine came with the bigger TB and better flowing injectors as well. Usually all it takes is one of the adapter harnesses I mentored above I just haven't been able to figure out why the different harnesses only work with certain years especially when one costs 4x the other lol.
Good call mentioning the 01-02 version working with the 0411 PCM since I have one from an 02 truck that I plan on using. I though the PCM could control either once tuned for it but if not that'd make a difference when choosing one.
If you can get the TBSS TB to work, you could always use a 3 to 4 bolt TB adapter and a Gen III DBW TB.
I had seen a couple of people claim they lost some low end when swapping to the newer style intake but it looks like all of those guys were running the stock 706/862 heads with the smaller valves and/or the stock cam. Neither of which will compliment the added flow of the newer intake and could explain the loss. On the other hand, everyone who had swapped to the better 799/243 heads or had a 6.0 with 317's all had really good improvements. I'm still a long ways out from being able to try it out for myself (long slow build) but I'm pretty confident it'll be a worthwhile mod.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Far as the potential torque loss it was just mentioned FYI, when modding it pays to have a lot of info to sort through. With 243s a compression bump, cam stall gears etc it might not apply or even if it did stall and gears could mask it and let the HP gain shine......
Far as the potential torque loss it was just mentioned FYI, when modding it pays to have a lot of info to sort through. With 243s a compression bump, cam stall gears etc it might not apply or even if it did stall and gears could mask it and let the HP gain shine......
I've only seen one or two people say they lost power switching to the newer intake but again from what I remember they had the smaller 5.3's and were running the older heads. Remember the Gen IV 5.3's make around 30-40+ hp/tq than the older 5.3's because of the newer intake design, better flowing 799/243 heads, and a half tick of compression. If you put the same intake, 799/243 heads (milled to make up compression), and a newer camshaft that's spec'd to work with them then I really don't see how you would lose any power.
As far as the TB size goes, the TBSS uses the same 87mm TB as the trucks. A few guys on one of the TBSS forums had tried swapping to the 90mm car TB and actually lost some on the dyno and in the ET's.
As far as the TB size goes, the TBSS uses the same 87mm TB as the trucks. A few guys on one of the TBSS forums had tried swapping to the 90mm car TB and actually lost some on the dyno and in the ET's.
Yes they are. So to be clear, the manifold that is on the TBSS is also on the following vehicles:
4.8L
2007–present Chevrolet Silverado 1500
2007–present Chevrolet Tahoe
2007–present GMC Sierra 1500
2007–present GMC Yukon
5.3L
2004–2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer including EXT (through 2006)
2005–2009 GMC Envoy Denali
2005–2006 GMC Envoy XL
2005 GMC Envoy XUV
2005–2007 Buick Rainier
2005–2009 Saab 9-7X
2007 Chevrolet Silverado 1500
2007 GMC Sierra 1500
2007–present Chevrolet Avalanche
2007–present Chevrolet Silverado 1500
2007–present Chevrolet Suburban 1/2 ton
2007–present Chevrolet Tahoe
2007–present GMC Sierra 1500
2007–present GMC Yukon
2007–present GMC Yukon XL 1/2 ton
2008–present Hummer H3 Alpha
2009–present Chevrolet Colorado/GMC Canyon
and of course 2006- 2009 TBSS



