New Hooker 4th-gen F-body Headers and Exhaust
#381
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It's really a question that one can only answer for themself since nobody else knows what the most important characteristics/ considerations are to each individual. At the stage I'm at in my life (wife, kids and other interests) I'm not spending $2,000 on an exhaust system for any car I drive...period. Some guys will lay out that kind of cash, but that's not who the Hooker system is targeted towards and it shows in the 50% price differential.
#382
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
No kidding. $1200 for maybe 5-10 more rwhp at 6500rpms on a fully built 346. I'd rather buy a nitrous kit. Heck, take the money it takes it to buy that exhaust and the intake, heads, and cam to take advantage of it and you could have a supercharger kit making 500rwhp through almost any catback. Different strokes for different folks for sure.
#383
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
What are the power gains with hooker's 1 7/8" headers and true dual system? I read through all the pages and couldn't find it. Also looked at hooker's web site and saw that using the 1 7/8" headers requires and additional adapter between the headers and the exhaust but I couldn't find additional info, just hat is is necessary.
#384
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
What are the power gains with hooker's 1 7/8" headers and true dual system? I read through all the pages and couldn't find it. Also looked at hooker's web site and saw that using the 1 7/8" headers requires and additional adapter between the headers and the exhaust but I couldn't find additional info, just hat is is necessary.
#386
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I see what you're talking about on the Holley site:
"Designed for direct bolt-in connection to Hooker 70201301-RHKR 1-3/4” mid-length headers; connection to Hooker 70201302-RHKR 1-7/8” mid-length headers requires use of an available adapter tube kit"
I'm not sure what adapter they are referring to. I was under the impression this kit was designed around the 1 7/8" midlengths. I don't recall any adapters being mentioned for that. Toddoky will have to chime in.
"Designed for direct bolt-in connection to Hooker 70201301-RHKR 1-3/4” mid-length headers; connection to Hooker 70201302-RHKR 1-7/8” mid-length headers requires use of an available adapter tube kit"
I'm not sure what adapter they are referring to. I was under the impression this kit was designed around the 1 7/8" midlengths. I don't recall any adapters being mentioned for that. Toddoky will have to chime in.
#387
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I see what you're talking about on the Holley site:
"Designed for direct bolt-in connection to Hooker 70201301-RHKR 1-3/4” mid-length headers; connection to Hooker 70201302-RHKR 1-7/8” mid-length headers requires use of an available adapter tube kit"
I'm not sure what adapter they are referring to. I was under the impression this kit was designed around the 1 7/8" midlengths. I don't recall any adapters being mentioned for that. Toddoky will have to chime in.
"Designed for direct bolt-in connection to Hooker 70201301-RHKR 1-3/4” mid-length headers; connection to Hooker 70201302-RHKR 1-7/8” mid-length headers requires use of an available adapter tube kit"
I'm not sure what adapter they are referring to. I was under the impression this kit was designed around the 1 7/8" midlengths. I don't recall any adapters being mentioned for that. Toddoky will have to chime in.
#388
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It's a misprint, someone in the marketing department loaded the discription onto the website incorrectly. The Hooker dual exhaust connects directly to either the 1-3/4" or 1-7/8" Hooker Blackheart mid-length headers.
The following users liked this post:
30thT/A1071 (03-08-2020)
#391
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I can truly appreciate your position as I would feel the same if I had made the purchase. Unfortunately, my best guess is all I can provide in terms of shipping dates as I am merely the designer of these products have no connection to the production or order processes here. I apologize for any hold-up in your plans my limited details may have imposed on you.
#392
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Did my install this weekend.
Mated the system to Speed Engineering 1 3/4 Long Tubes.
Modifications to supplied tubes were minimal. I used the supplied reducer cones by cutting the bend off just after the O2 bung. Alignment from header collectors to Hooker true dual exhaust was almost perfect.
All I needed were two 1" pieces of straight 3" SS tube that were welded between VBand clamp flange and reducer cones.
![Name: Pipe%20mods_zpshabvw1zt.jpg
Views: 567
Size: 83.1 KB](https://ls1tech.com/forums/attachments/generation-iii-external-engine/604152d1501289145-new-hooker-4th-gen-f-body-headers-exhaust-pipe-20mods_zpshabvw1zt.jpg)
I must say I am impressed with build quality, fitment and resulting ground clearance. Hangers on mufflers are made of large diameter SS rod and brackets supplied zinc coated with heavy rubber isolators.
![Name: Mufflers_zpslvvtnm4j.jpg
Views: 582
Size: 88.4 KB](https://ls1tech.com/forums/attachments/generation-iii-external-engine/604153d1501289145-new-hooker-4th-gen-f-body-headers-exhaust-mufflers_zpslvvtnm4j.jpg)
Brackets
Mated the system to Speed Engineering 1 3/4 Long Tubes.
Modifications to supplied tubes were minimal. I used the supplied reducer cones by cutting the bend off just after the O2 bung. Alignment from header collectors to Hooker true dual exhaust was almost perfect.
All I needed were two 1" pieces of straight 3" SS tube that were welded between VBand clamp flange and reducer cones.
![Name: Pipe%20mods_zpshabvw1zt.jpg
Views: 567
Size: 83.1 KB](https://ls1tech.com/forums/attachments/generation-iii-external-engine/604152d1501289145-new-hooker-4th-gen-f-body-headers-exhaust-pipe-20mods_zpshabvw1zt.jpg)
I must say I am impressed with build quality, fitment and resulting ground clearance. Hangers on mufflers are made of large diameter SS rod and brackets supplied zinc coated with heavy rubber isolators.
![Name: Mufflers_zpslvvtnm4j.jpg
Views: 582
Size: 88.4 KB](https://ls1tech.com/forums/attachments/generation-iii-external-engine/604153d1501289145-new-hooker-4th-gen-f-body-headers-exhaust-mufflers_zpslvvtnm4j.jpg)
Brackets
![Name: hanger_zpsydo0pptr.jpg
Views: 551
Size: 64.8 KB](https://ls1tech.com/forums/attachments/generation-iii-external-engine/604154d1501289145-new-hooker-4th-gen-f-body-headers-exhaust-hanger_zpsydo0pptr.jpg)
#393
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Did my install this weekend.
Mated the system to Speed Engineering 1 3/4 Long Tubes.
Modifications to supplied tubes were minimal. I used the supplied reducer cones by cutting the bend off just after the O2 bung. Alignment from header collectors to Hooker true dual exhaust was almost perfect.
All I needed were two 1" pieces of straight 3" SS tube that were welded between VBand clamp flange and reducer cones.
![](http://i270.photobucket.com/albums/jj90/reguzmans/Johnny%20Go%20Fast/Pipe%20mods_zpshabvw1zt.jpg)
I must say I am impressed with build quality, fitment and resulting ground clearance. Hangers on mufflers are made of large diameter SS rod and brackets supplied zinc coated with heavy rubber isolators.
![](http://i270.photobucket.com/albums/jj90/reguzmans/Johnny%20Go%20Fast/Mufflers_zpslvvtnm4j.jpg)
Brackets
![](http://i270.photobucket.com/albums/jj90/reguzmans/Johnny%20Go%20Fast/hanger_zpsydo0pptr.jpg)
Mated the system to Speed Engineering 1 3/4 Long Tubes.
Modifications to supplied tubes were minimal. I used the supplied reducer cones by cutting the bend off just after the O2 bung. Alignment from header collectors to Hooker true dual exhaust was almost perfect.
All I needed were two 1" pieces of straight 3" SS tube that were welded between VBand clamp flange and reducer cones.
![](http://i270.photobucket.com/albums/jj90/reguzmans/Johnny%20Go%20Fast/Pipe%20mods_zpshabvw1zt.jpg)
I must say I am impressed with build quality, fitment and resulting ground clearance. Hangers on mufflers are made of large diameter SS rod and brackets supplied zinc coated with heavy rubber isolators.
![](http://i270.photobucket.com/albums/jj90/reguzmans/Johnny%20Go%20Fast/Mufflers_zpslvvtnm4j.jpg)
Brackets
![](http://i270.photobucket.com/albums/jj90/reguzmans/Johnny%20Go%20Fast/hanger_zpsydo0pptr.jpg)
#397
#398
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This product was just brought to my attention today and I read all 20 pages.
I consider my Camaro more of a cruiser. It's a vert, and I refuse to put a cage in it, so it'll never see a track. I want to mod it, but don't want to really impact the reliability of the vehicle. I am also lowered. I would like to bump up the power a little.,
I know exhaust is the starting point, but I don't want to kill my ground clearance as it's already about as little as I can stand. I also don't want a loud obnoxious exhaust, especially a raspy one.
When I first saw this, I initially thought "yeah, but it's probably aluminized steel". I'm pleasantly surprised to see this is stainless. The price is more than I would like to pay (I'm just cheap), but I totally understand the pricing - comparatively, I think this is a great deal. I am really impressed by how it tucks.
I don't subscribe to the "mo is betta" mentality. I don't need the stiffest coil spring rates, the biggest cam, the largest exhaust...this really looks like it'd suit my needs very well. Tucks as good or better than the stock exhaust. Provides a good 20-25 rwhp gain from the sound of it, and paves the way for other mods. It sounds great.
I'm really interested to see what the dyno results are on the 50-state legal catback option as well!
My only gripe is the tips. I also understand why they are what they are. The question I have on those is - are the mufflers mirror images of one another from a location perspective? What I am wondering is if I were to pick up some single rolled edge tip (like the stock SS tip, just larger diameter), would they be spaced evenly on the rear of the car, or is one side of the exhaust asymmetrical to the other.
All in all, I just wanted to chime in and say that there IS at least one potential customer here who truly appreciates what this is. It looks like a nice upgrade over stock with none of the hassles of the other current offerings. It's exactly what I am looking for from a performance, sound, material, and fitment perspective.
I consider my Camaro more of a cruiser. It's a vert, and I refuse to put a cage in it, so it'll never see a track. I want to mod it, but don't want to really impact the reliability of the vehicle. I am also lowered. I would like to bump up the power a little.,
I know exhaust is the starting point, but I don't want to kill my ground clearance as it's already about as little as I can stand. I also don't want a loud obnoxious exhaust, especially a raspy one.
When I first saw this, I initially thought "yeah, but it's probably aluminized steel". I'm pleasantly surprised to see this is stainless. The price is more than I would like to pay (I'm just cheap), but I totally understand the pricing - comparatively, I think this is a great deal. I am really impressed by how it tucks.
I don't subscribe to the "mo is betta" mentality. I don't need the stiffest coil spring rates, the biggest cam, the largest exhaust...this really looks like it'd suit my needs very well. Tucks as good or better than the stock exhaust. Provides a good 20-25 rwhp gain from the sound of it, and paves the way for other mods. It sounds great.
I'm really interested to see what the dyno results are on the 50-state legal catback option as well!
My only gripe is the tips. I also understand why they are what they are. The question I have on those is - are the mufflers mirror images of one another from a location perspective? What I am wondering is if I were to pick up some single rolled edge tip (like the stock SS tip, just larger diameter), would they be spaced evenly on the rear of the car, or is one side of the exhaust asymmetrical to the other.
All in all, I just wanted to chime in and say that there IS at least one potential customer here who truly appreciates what this is. It looks like a nice upgrade over stock with none of the hassles of the other current offerings. It's exactly what I am looking for from a performance, sound, material, and fitment perspective.
#399
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This product was just brought to my attention today and I read all 20 pages.
I consider my Camaro more of a cruiser. It's a vert, and I refuse to put a cage in it, so it'll never see a track. I want to mod it, but don't want to really impact the reliability of the vehicle. I am also lowered. I would like to bump up the power a little.,
I know exhaust is the starting point, but I don't want to kill my ground clearance as it's already about as little as I can stand. I also don't want a loud obnoxious exhaust, especially a raspy one.
When I first saw this, I initially thought "yeah, but it's probably aluminized steel". I'm pleasantly surprised to see this is stainless. The price is more than I would like to pay (I'm just cheap), but I totally understand the pricing - comparatively, I think this is a great deal. I am really impressed by how it tucks.
I don't subscribe to the "mo is betta" mentality. I don't need the stiffest coil spring rates, the biggest cam, the largest exhaust...this really looks like it'd suit my needs very well. Tucks as good or better than the stock exhaust. Provides a good 20-25 rwhp gain from the sound of it, and paves the way for other mods. It sounds great.
I'm really interested to see what the dyno results are on the 50-state legal catback option as well!
My only gripe is the tips. I also understand why they are what they are. The question I have on those is - are the mufflers mirror images of one another from a location perspective? What I am wondering is if I were to pick up some single rolled edge tip (like the stock SS tip, just larger diameter), would they be spaced evenly on the rear of the car, or is one side of the exhaust asymmetrical to the other.
All in all, I just wanted to chime in and say that there IS at least one potential customer here who truly appreciates what this is. It looks like a nice upgrade over stock with none of the hassles of the other current offerings. It's exactly what I am looking for from a performance, sound, material, and fitment perspective.
I consider my Camaro more of a cruiser. It's a vert, and I refuse to put a cage in it, so it'll never see a track. I want to mod it, but don't want to really impact the reliability of the vehicle. I am also lowered. I would like to bump up the power a little.,
I know exhaust is the starting point, but I don't want to kill my ground clearance as it's already about as little as I can stand. I also don't want a loud obnoxious exhaust, especially a raspy one.
When I first saw this, I initially thought "yeah, but it's probably aluminized steel". I'm pleasantly surprised to see this is stainless. The price is more than I would like to pay (I'm just cheap), but I totally understand the pricing - comparatively, I think this is a great deal. I am really impressed by how it tucks.
I don't subscribe to the "mo is betta" mentality. I don't need the stiffest coil spring rates, the biggest cam, the largest exhaust...this really looks like it'd suit my needs very well. Tucks as good or better than the stock exhaust. Provides a good 20-25 rwhp gain from the sound of it, and paves the way for other mods. It sounds great.
I'm really interested to see what the dyno results are on the 50-state legal catback option as well!
My only gripe is the tips. I also understand why they are what they are. The question I have on those is - are the mufflers mirror images of one another from a location perspective? What I am wondering is if I were to pick up some single rolled edge tip (like the stock SS tip, just larger diameter), would they be spaced evenly on the rear of the car, or is one side of the exhaust asymmetrical to the other.
All in all, I just wanted to chime in and say that there IS at least one potential customer here who truly appreciates what this is. It looks like a nice upgrade over stock with none of the hassles of the other current offerings. It's exactly what I am looking for from a performance, sound, material, and fitment perspective.
Last edited by Toddoky; 11-04-2015 at 06:52 PM.
#400
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thanks for the quick reply Toddoky.
Makes sense about the tips - and, honestly, the asymmetry of them isn't what bothers me...I prefer the "dual single" look (but dual duals are acceptable to me too), but I'd really like either a rolled edge or double walled tip. I did see you mention that it's a possibility others will be offered down the road.
Any ideas on when you'll have the catback on a vehicle and get it on the dyno?
Thanks for all the information you're providing in this thread. It's extraordinarily helpful. I can only begin to imagine the amount of time you have spent on this thread alone!
Makes sense about the tips - and, honestly, the asymmetry of them isn't what bothers me...I prefer the "dual single" look (but dual duals are acceptable to me too), but I'd really like either a rolled edge or double walled tip. I did see you mention that it's a possibility others will be offered down the road.
Any ideas on when you'll have the catback on a vehicle and get it on the dyno?
Thanks for all the information you're providing in this thread. It's extraordinarily helpful. I can only begin to imagine the amount of time you have spent on this thread alone!