Anybody run this intake?
Anybody run this intake? http://www.ws6project.com/user_stor/...oducts_id=7836
I dont think i have seen this low profile version. Supposedly it clears f body cowls. I have a na set up that revs to 7k. Anyone have any 1st hand experience with this? It sure does look nice!
I dont think i have seen this low profile version. Supposedly it clears f body cowls. I have a na set up that revs to 7k. Anyone have any 1st hand experience with this? It sure does look nice!
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 255
From: Coast of San Mateo County Between Pacifica & HMB
With those short runners NA gains will be above 6000 RPM
trading Massive losses in torque from 2000-5000 RPM.
I would bet 3 lb ft lost between 2-5K for each 1 HP gained
from 6000+ RPM. Best with Solid Cam peak HP 7000+
spinning 7500+ and or forced induction.
Does look cool though!
trading Massive losses in torque from 2000-5000 RPM.
I would bet 3 lb ft lost between 2-5K for each 1 HP gained
from 6000+ RPM. Best with Solid Cam peak HP 7000+
spinning 7500+ and or forced induction.
Does look cool though!
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 255
From: Coast of San Mateo County Between Pacifica & HMB
No!
Just the opposite! The new Fast intake runners the shorter
You go the higher the Peak HP, as long as you have head flow,
Cam design, valvetrain stability, and bottom end to keep
Spinning higher.
Just the opposite! The new Fast intake runners the shorter
You go the higher the Peak HP, as long as you have head flow,
Cam design, valvetrain stability, and bottom end to keep
Spinning higher.
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,845
Likes: 255
From: Coast of San Mateo County Between Pacifica & HMB
Pozesd99'
Your version 2 would perform best with FAST 102 with standard
(long runners) for the street than change to mid length runners
For the track. Either set up would Annihilate the Sniper Intake
For your V2 Application. Ported MSD by Tony Mamo @ MMS
would also work very well. 4" Stroke makes up for RPM by
Increasing piston speed VS stock Stroke at same RPM.
Your version 2 would perform best with FAST 102 with standard
(long runners) for the street than change to mid length runners
For the track. Either set up would Annihilate the Sniper Intake
For your V2 Application. Ported MSD by Tony Mamo @ MMS
would also work very well. 4" Stroke makes up for RPM by
Increasing piston speed VS stock Stroke at same RPM.
Trending Topics
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
Get the Fast....it easily supports revving to 7k and makes good power under the curve. The intake in OP would be best with a solid roller spinning 7500+ rpm or forced induction as Navyblue210 mentioned.