Fast lsxrt 102 idle issues
https://ls1tech.com/forums/pcm-diagn...g-issue-2.html
I had an LSXRT & 102 TB Nick Williams on my 91 RS 383 LS1 with a 229/229 cam. The LSXRT sucked it was horrible to drive and still sucked after over half a dozen tuning sessions with two expert tuners.
We dyno tested the 102 Fast LSXRT , LSX92 and a customer Peak ported LS6 with the 90MM TPIS snout. Same day, same water and air temperature. The Peak ported LS6 with TPiS snout ball stomped both fast intakes. In area under the curve for horsepower and torque, in peak hp and in peak torque. Driveability was stock with the mod'd LS6 intake. In fact two other people that drove my RS said they'd give up 30 hp to get rid of the LSXRT and it's horrible driveability. Amazingly the RS gained hp and torque and driveability.
The PP LS6 TPIS made 2 hp peak more than the LSXRT in my dyno testing on my small cam stroker.
I don't think my findings would be true with big cam high rpm set ups but with a smaller cam and 383 or less cubes, I wouldn't be surprised if a mod'd LS6 intake was superior in performance and driveability in many cases.
For your car the Fast LSX 92 might work well.
It might be worth trying the LSXRT with a 92mm TB...I didn't do that.
Also the 102 stuff is harder to tune with a 24x crank and the older slower PCM that uses cable TB.
Best wishes
Last edited by 64post; May 25, 2017 at 11:10 PM.
We were all shocked. Actually flabbergasted is a better description.
The Peak Ported LS6 intake with the TPiS 90mm snout out preformed both Fast intakes in every measurable category on my small cam 383LS1. The harmonics and combination of parts in my 383 LS1 engine simply made more power everywhere with the tricked out LS6 intake.
I've discussed at this result with several experts, one of which did cylinder head development for Katech - and all of them said it's quite possible, engines aren't steady state like a flow bench, harmonics and other factors come into play. They all also suggested that with more cam and more rpm my trick LS6 wouldn't keep up with the Fast intakes.
With a big 236/242 cam I think the Fast intakes would have excelled.
Speaking of Fast, they were no help when I tried to contact them severally times. I gave up.
With drive by wire TB, 58x crank and the newer more powerful PCM's the LSXRT might work OK. With the older cable TB's, 24x crank and slower 2002 LS1 PCM the LSXRT is far more difficult to get dialed in with great driveability. I also suspect more cubes is 400+ make it easier to dial in.
There may be some who get the LSXRT to work with the old PCM's. After I switched to the PP LS6 TPIS intake, I met one of the honchos (owner?) at HP Tuners at the PRI show last year's. He introduced me to a tuner that has been able to take most of the Fast 102 LSXRT issues. I will see if I can find the contact info.
Getting power is pretty easy compared to dialing in driveability - unless my RS gets a bigger cam there's no reason to try the LSXRT on my car again - it under performed with my current set up.
Have you confirmed the TB blade is perfectly centered in the TB with a feeler gauge?
When chasing after my LSXRT's issues, the engineer at Vararam said that is one of the most often over looked issues in tuning 102 TB set ups. Off center TB blade can effect airflow and the Idle control counts.
He also said make sure the TB seals correctly and check for vacuum leaks.
As a band aid - a slow idle decay so the rpm drops gradually can help with idle issues.
Unhooking the IAC and manually crack the TB open so the car idles with out IAC, can help some then tune for driveability . This way the car should not die due to slow IAC response. Then plug the IAC in and let it help.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
With that said, I've tuned quite a few of them after I went through a few cam combos and TB combos on my car. It's not that hard to do it. But you have to basically throw away all the idle air routines for the stock car. It's the one place where you can't really use the stock tables as a baseline. You have to start over.
IAC effective area table will end up looking very different depending on how far you end up having to crack the blade or if you have to drill (I had to drill mine). And with the FAST, you may have to ream out the IAC passage.
So it's not really a bolt on and go solution. Not at all.
If you have HPT I can help. Otherwise, you'll need to take to a place that has specifically tuned that TB.
And to say the LS6 can outgun a FAST... well, consider the LSXRT is the best FAST has ever put out. It has a huge plenum and straight, short runners. You have to cam it differently than you do an LS6. But it will walk it.
It puts a hurting on the MSD AirForce for Cathedral ports. That giant plenum is why.
With that said, I've tuned quite a few of them after I went through a few cam combos and TB combos on my car. It's not that hard to do it. But you have to basically throw away all the idle air routines for the stock car. It's the one place where you can't really use the stock tables as a baseline. You have to start over.
IAC effective area table will end up looking very different depending on how far you end up having to crack the blade or if you have to drill (I had to drill mine). And with the FAST, you may have to ream out the IAC passage.
So it's not really a bolt on and go solution. Not at all.
If you have HPT I can help. Otherwise, you'll need to take to a place that has specifically tuned that TB.
And to say the LS6 can outgun a FAST... well, consider the LSXRT is the best FAST has ever put out. It has a huge plenum and straight, short runners. You have to cam it differently than you do an LS6. But it will walk it.
It puts a hurting on the MSD AirForce for Cathedral ports. That giant plenum is why.
But in my case, the MSD walked the LSXR. It could have something to do with the cam. I still think there comes a point when the cam IVC gets late enough that the shorter runners are better match for the cam and vice versa.
With that said, I've tuned quite a few of them after I went through a few cam combos and TB combos on my car. It's not that hard to do it. But you have to basically throw away all the idle air routines for the stock car. It's the one place where you can't really use the stock tables as a baseline. You have to start over.
IAC effective area table will end up looking very different depending on how far you end up having to crack the blade or if you have to drill (I had to drill mine). And with the FAST, you may have to ream out the IAC passage.
So it's not really a bolt on and go solution. Not at all.
If you have HPT I can help. Otherwise, you'll need to take to a place that has specifically tuned that TB.
And to say the LS6 can outgun a FAST... well, consider the LSXRT is the best FAST has ever put out. It has a huge plenum and straight, short runners. You have to cam it differently than you do an LS6. But it will walk it.
It puts a hurting on the MSD AirForce for Cathedral ports. That giant plenum is why.[/QUwhy.
I had it dyno tested. Did you two do that? My statements are based on data collected from testing on my set up. It's not an opinion.
In at least one specific case, like my small cam 383LS1 the Fast LSXRT wasn't as good as a tweaked LS6 intake.
That's why my fast LSXRT is collecting dust on the self in the garage, replaced by a Ported LS6 TPiS.
Last edited by 99 Black Bird T/A; May 26, 2017 at 11:40 AM.
We were all shocked. Actually flabbergasted is a better description.
The Peak Ported LS6 intake with the TPiS 90mm snout out preformed both Fast intakes in every measurable category on my small cam 383LS1. The harmonics and combination of parts in my 383 LS1 engine simply made more power everywhere with the tricked out LS6 intake.
I've discussed at this result with several experts, one of which did cylinder head development for Katech - and all of them said it's quite possible, engines aren't steady state like a flow bench, harmonics and other factors come into play. They all also suggested that with more cam and more rpm my trick LS6 wouldn't keep up with the Fast intakes.
With a big 236/242 cam I think the Fast intakes would have excelled.
Speaking of Fast, they were no help when I tried to contact them severally times. I gave up.
With drive by wire TB, 58x crank and the newer more powerful PCM's the LSXRT might work OK. With the older cable TB's, 24x crank and slower 2002 LS1 PCM the LSXRT is far more difficult to get dialed in with great driveability. I also suspect more cubes is 400+ make it easier to dial in.
There may be some who get the LSXRT to work with the old PCM's. After I switched to the PP LS6 TPIS intake, I met one of the honchos (owner?) at HP Tuners at the PRI show last year's. He introduced me to a tuner that has been able to take most of the Fast 102 LSXRT issues. I will see if I can find the contact info.
Getting power is pretty easy compared to dialing in driveability - unless my RS gets a bigger cam there's no reason to try the LSXRT on my car again - it under performed with my current set up.
Last edited by 64post; May 27, 2017 at 09:52 AM.
Hammer really is stuck on the FAST being better on every combination. I will never be of that mind set. I could very mulch see better air speed in the LS6 making more power on a smaller motor/cam vs the FAST's greater volume. Some will argue the only place air speed matters is in the head runner but I believe high air speed in the intake is going to make for higher speed heading into the combustion chamber.

I'm sure the MSD wouldn't have worked well for my set up either. Properly marching parts is key.
I'm happy with 442rwtq & 465 rwhp and the area under the curve the small cam 383 LS1 made. Drives like stock

I've provided my input based actual direct experience using an LSXRT intake and the tuning issues that occurred to try to help the OP. I have a good idea what the OP has been dealing with - it sucks. One day do another build with a 400+ Cid motor to see if I can get some use out of my old LSXRT.
I will stay out of the thread from here on to help get it back on track so the OP can get some help with the LSXRT issues.
Last edited by 99 Black Bird T/A; May 26, 2017 at 11:58 AM.











