From The Headers Back??
I have (under construction) a 1998 S-10 with a L33 (5.3)... Ed Curtis Cam, Ported Polished, LS6 Intake, Circle D 3k - built 4L60, 8.8 w/3.73
I am running the Stainless Works 1 7/8" Long Tube Headers.
If I got this right, the best path would be run an X-pipe and tails.
In order for me to run an X pipe I will have to crossover from the drivers side to the passenger side, run the X, then run both pipes down passenger side (Fuel Tank Reasons)
Does the unequal length before the X-Pipe have a negative effect?
Would true-duals or a Y-Pipe be better?
ALSO, Keep everything 3" from the collector to the bumper or should I drop/increase diameter somewhere?
I attached a picture I found where somebody ran a similar setup so you can see the unequal length before the X I'm referring to.
photo from: http://bdurfee.blogspot.com/2016/
Trending Topics
it will sound nice and perform well, so i wouldn't worry about it.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Heres the graph I was talking about you can see even though the graph is starting at 3k there is no real difference between the 2 so why would you want to run the 2.5 and give up all that power threw the curve if you're "hot rodding" around town and end up racing someone dont you want to make more power than that other person? also if you end up racing someone from a dig who isent putting there foot on the break an spinning the rpm up a little bit? no one is racing from a dead idle to 2,500 rpm if that is where the 2.5 is suppose to out perform the 3in
Also somthing to mention OP said he has a 3k converter
Heres the graph I was talking about you can see even though the graph is starting at 3k there is no real difference between the 2 so why would you want to run the 2.5 and give up all that power threw the curve if you're "hot rodding" around town and end up racing someone dont you want to make more power than that other person? also if you end up racing someone from a dig who isent putting there foot on the break an spinning the rpm up a little bit? no one is racing from a dead idle to 2,500 rpm if that is where the 2.5 is suppose to out perform the 3in
Also somthing to mention OP said he has a 3k converter
The dual 2.5 should be better than a a 3 inch Y pipe set up, I think too.
I would like to point out the 2.5 should give a hair more ground clearance if the fitment is good. I went with a 2.5 dual x pipe set up on my 416 TA because giving up 10-15 hp up is acceptable to get another 1/4 of grounds clearance on my lowered car. Wanted to avoid scrapping when pulling in or out of my driveway etc. The dyno test you referenced was why I picked the 2.5 set up - the power loss wasn't 50 hp etc. The dyno showed the loss was small enough I was OK with accepting it. For my car street able ground clearance was more important. That might be true sometimes for other folks too.
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/ccrp-9812-2-quarter-inch-exhaust-3-inch-exhaust/
)For my Jeep YJ my plan was almost identical to the pic above,, same issues, fitment/sound/fuel tank... there just are not that many options one a jeep and remain stealth enough to get through the DEQ testing where I live. I was planning on dual 2.5 to the front of the mufflers, then a 2-1 to a 3" out the back.. Maybe not perfect but I am not racing or doing any bolt ons, just a swap and tune.. I'm still going from 125 to 300+ HP, doubt I'll care..
)For my Jeep YJ my plan was almost identical to the pic above,, same issues, fitment/sound/fuel tank... there just are not that many options one a jeep and remain stealth enough to get through the DEQ testing where I live. I was planning on dual 2.5 to the front of the mufflers, then a 2-1 to a 3" out the back.. Maybe not perfect but I am not racing or doing any bolt ons, just a swap and tune.. I'm still going from 125 to 300+ HP, doubt I'll care..

you start needing 3" duals around that point... the amount of exhaust gas volume and power you are making matter with exhaust size.
at least a H/C LS? I say 3" duals all day long. stock or bolt-on? nah. 2.5" duals, 3" from the header collector up until the x-pipe or h.
i've seen posts of a dyno with a 6.0 LS2, no other mods, 3" exhaust, and it lost a little low end, and made around the same peak power. 3" can be too large, depending.
Not sure what OP has done to the motor, but it's worth considering.
all the same, he'll be fine with 3" all the way back duals. at the very least it will give him room to grow. the most he will lose is a few ft-lbs of torque on the low end. however, I wouldn't go larger unless a nice amount of boost is added.
op says he is getting a custom spec cam which with a 3k converter id imagine being bigger than the cam they used in that dyno pull along with an ls6 intake which flows more than the tiny perfomer intake and he made a comment about port and polish which i would think hes talking heads all out of a GEN 3 or + motor which these things love to breath hes wanting to make the most power with his set up so once again to op keep your 3in set up and dont look back you will never have to mess with the exhaust again
The dual 2.5 should be better than a a 3 inch Y pipe set up, I think too.
I would like to point out the 2.5 should give a hair more ground clearance if the fitment is good. I went with a 2.5 dual x pipe set up on my 416 TA because giving up 10-15 hp up is acceptable to get another 1/4 of grounds clearance on my lowered car. Wanted to avoid scrapping when pulling in or out of my driveway etc. The dyno test you referenced was why I picked the 2.5 set up - the power loss wasn't 50 hp etc. The dyno showed the loss was small enough I was OK with accepting it. For my car street able ground clearance was more important. That might be true sometimes for other folks too.











